Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing and conveying risks and benefits of imaging in neonates using ionizing radiation and sedation/anesthesia

  • Neonatal imaging
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neonates represent a unique subset of the pediatric population that requires special attention and careful thought when implementing advanced cross-sectional imaging with CT or MRI. The ionizing radiation associated with CT and the sedation/anesthesia occasionally required for MRI present risks that must be balanced against the perceived benefit of the imaging examination in the unique and particularly susceptible neonatal population. We review the perceived risks of ionizing radiation and the more concrete risks of sedation/anesthesia in term and preterm neonates in the context of an imaging paradigm. When the expected diagnostic yield from CT and MRI is similar, and sedation is required for MRI but not for CT, CT likely has the higher benefit-to-risk ratio in the neonate. However, despite the risks, the most appropriate imaging modality should always be chosen after thoughtful consideration is given to each unique patient and informed discussions including radiology, anesthesia, neonatology and the parents/caregivers are pursued.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Callahan MJ, MacDougall RD, Bixby SD et al (2018) Ionizing radiation from computed tomography versus anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging in infants and children: patient safety considerations. Pediatr Radiol 48:21–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartley K, Metayer C, Selvin S et al (2010) Diagnostic X-rays and risk of childhood leukaemia. Int J Epidemiol 39:1628–1637

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 32:228–231

  5. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT et al (2003) Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:13761–13766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chodick G, Ronckers CM, Shalev V, Ron E (2007) Excess lifetime cancer mortality risk attributable to radiation exposure from computed tomography examinations in children. Isr Med Assoc J 9:584–587

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Preston DL, Cullings H, Suyama A et al (2008) Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:428–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S et al (2007) Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat Res 168:1–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37:2–4

  12. Frush DP (2011) CT dose and risk estimates in children. Pediatr Radiol 41:483–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Strauss KJ, Goske MJ (2011) Estimated pediatric radiation dose during CT. Pediatr Radiol 41:472–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Strauss KJ, Goske MJ, Frush DP et al (2009) Image Gently vendor summit: working together for better estimates of pediatric radiation dose from CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1169–1175

  15. Strauss KJ, McKenney SE, Brady SL (2020) Improved estimates of trunk and head CT radiation dose: development of size-specific dose estimate. J Am Coll Radiol 17:560–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Little MP, Wakeford R, Tawn EJ et al (2009) Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology 251:6–12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) Position statement on radiation risks from medical imaging procedures. https://www.aapm.org/org/policies/details.asp?id=318&type=PP&current=true. Accessed 19 Feb 2021

  18. Hendee WR, O'Connor MK (2012) Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy. Radiology 264:312–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ et al (2011) Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology 258:889–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization (2016) Communicating radiation risks in paediatric imaging: information to support health care discussions about benefit and risk. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 1–86

  21. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

  22. Johnson JN, Hornik CP, Li JS et al (2014) Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimation in children with heart disease. Circulation 130:161–167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. American Assocation of Physicists in Medicine (2021) The alliance for quality computed tomography. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/CTProtocols/. Accessed 19 Feb 2021

  24. Gottumukkala RV, Kalra MK, Tabari A et al (2019) Advanced CT techniques for decreasing radiation dose, reducing sedation requirements, and optimizing image quality in children. Radiographics 39:709–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huda W, Lieberman KA, Chang J, Roskopf ML (2004) Patient size and X-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. I. Radiation doses. Med Phys 31:588–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. MacDougall RD, Kleinman PL, Yu L, Lee EY (2016) Pediatric thoracic CT angiography at 70 kV: a phantom study to investigate the effects on image quality and radiation dose. Pediatr Radiol 46:1114–1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Siegel MJ, Hildebolt C, Bradley D (2013) Effects of automated kilovoltage selection technology on contrast-enhanced pediatric CT and CT angiography. Radiology 268:538–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kalender WA, Deak P, Kellermeier M et al (2009) Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of X-ray spectra for CT. Med Phys 36:993–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kino A, Zucker EJ, Honkanen A et al (2019) Ultrafast pediatric chest computed tomography: comparison of free-breathing vs. breath-hold imaging with and without anesthesia in young children. Pediatr Radiol 49:301–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bodelle B, Fischbach C, Booz C et al (2017) Free-breathing high-pitch 80 kVp dual-source computed tomography of the pediatric chest: image quality, presence of motion artifacts and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 89:208–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Paterson N, Waterhouse P (2011) Risk in pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth 21:848–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cravero JP (2009) Risk and safety of pediatric sedation/anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 22:509–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cravero JP, Beach ML, Blike GT et al (2009) The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the pediatric sedation research consortium. Anesth Analg 108:795–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Greenberg SB (2011) Rebalancing the risks of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol 41:951–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Masaracchia MM, Tsapakos MJ, McNulty NJ, Beach ML (2017) Changing the paradigm for diagnostic MRI in pediatrics: don't hold your breath. Paediatr Anaesth 27:880–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cote CJ, Zaslavsky A, Downes JJ et al (1995) Postoperative apnea in former preterm infants after inguinal herniorrhaphy. A combined analysis. Anesthesiology 82:809–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Parad RB (2018) Non-sedation of the neonate for radiologic procedures. Pediatr Radiol 48:524–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Havidich JE, Beach M, Dierdorf SF et al (2016) Preterm versus term children: analysis of sedation/anesthesia adverse events and longitudinal risk. Pediatrics 137:e20150463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Brown ML, DiNardo JA, Nasr VG (2020) Anesthesia in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease undergoing noncardiac surgery: defining the risk. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 34:470–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Murat I, Constant I, Maud'huy H (2004) Perioperative anaesthetic morbidity in children: a database of 24,165 anaesthetics over a 30-month period. Paediatr Anaesth 14:158–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tay CL, Tan GM, Ng SB (2001) Critical incidents in paediatric anaesthesia: an audit of 10,000 anaesthetics in Singapore. Paediatr Anaesth 11:711–718

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hoffman GM (2008) Outcomes of pediatric anesthesia. Semin Pediatr Surg 17:141–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Williams GD, Maan H, Ramamoorthy C et al (2010) Perioperative complications in children with pulmonary hypertension undergoing general anesthesia with ketamine. Paediatr Anaesth 20:28–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Hartman RE, Izumi Y et al (2003) Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits. J Neurosci 23:876–882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Rappaport B, Mellon RD, Simone A, Woodcock J (2011) Defining safe use of anesthesia in children. N Engl J Med 364:1387–1390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Young C, Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Qin YQ et al (2005) Potential of ketamine and midazolam, individually or in combination, to induce apoptotic neurodegeneration in the infant mouse brain. Br J Pharmacol 146:189–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Flick RP, Katusic SK, Colligan RC et al (2011) Cognitive and behavioral outcomes after early exposure to anesthesia and surgery. Pediatrics 128:e1053–e1061

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wilder RT, Flick RP, Sprung J et al (2009) Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort. Anesthesiology 110:796–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. McCann ME, de Graaff JC, Dorris L et al (2019) Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age after general anaesthesia or awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy (GAS): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled equivalence trial. Lancet 393:664–677

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Koo E, Oshodi T, Meschter C et al (2014) Neurotoxic effects of dexmedetomidine in fetal cynomolgus monkey brains. J Toxicol Sci 39:251–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Liao Z, Cao D, Han X et al (2014) Both JNK and P38 MAPK pathways participate in the protection by dexmedetomidine against isoflurane-induced neuroapoptosis in the hippocampus of neonatal rats. Brain Res Bull 107:69–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nasr VG, Davis JM (2015) Anesthetic use in newborn infants: the urgent need for rigorous evaluation. Pediatr Res 78:2–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Antonov NK, Ruzal-Shapiro CB, Morel KD et al (2017) Feed and wrap MRI technique in infants. Clin Pediatr 56:1095–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Heller BJ, Yudkowitz FS, Lipson S (2017) Can we reduce anesthesia exposure? Neonatal brain MRI: swaddling vs. sedation, a national survey. J Clin Anesth 38:119–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Templeton LB, Norton MJ, Goenaga-Diaz EJ et al (2020) Experience with a "feed and swaddle" program in infants up to six months of age. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 64:63–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Jaimes C, Kirsch JE, Gee MS (2018) Fast, free-breathing and motion-minimized techniques for pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol 48:1197–1208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Janos S, Schooler GR, Ngo JS, Davis JT (2019) Free-breathing unsedated MRI in children: justification and techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 50:365–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kozak BM, Jaimes C, Kirsch J, Gee MS (2020) MRI techniques to decrease imaging times in children. Radiographics 40:485–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ahmad R, Hu HH, Krishnamurthy R, Krishnamurthy R (2018) Reducing sedation for pediatric body MRI using accelerated and abbreviated imaging protocols. Pediatr Radiol 48:37–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lee JH, Choi YH, Cheon JE et al (2015) Improved abdominal MRI in non-breath-holding children using a radial k-space sampling technique. Pediatr Radiol 45:840–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, USA

    Gary R. Schooler

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Joseph P. Cravero

  3. Department of Radiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Michael J. Callahan

Authors
  1. Gary R. Schooler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph P. Cravero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael J. Callahan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary R. Schooler.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schooler, G.R., Cravero, J.P. & Callahan, M.J. Assessing and conveying risks and benefits of imaging in neonates using ionizing radiation and sedation/anesthesia. Pediatr Radiol 52, 616–621 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05138-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05138-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation