Skip to main content
Log in

Surveillance imaging in pediatric lymphoma

  • Pediatric oncologic imaging
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current therapies used in treating children with Hodgkin lymphoma and many histological subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma have resulted in overall survival rates exceeding 90% in many instances. With increasing concerns related to the cost of radiologic imaging, exposure to ionizing radiation, and potential false-positive results, the role of routine off-therapy surveillance imaging has been called into question. Although radiologic imaging plays an important role in diagnosing and assessing treatment response, in these children — the majority of whom have an excellent outcome following completion of therapy — there is an opportunity to dramatically reduce the number of off-therapy imaging evaluations. This review summarizes several recent studies in both Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma providing evidence to support these efforts. In addition, we propose a surveillance imaging strategy that uses a novel risk-adapted and response-based approach to determine which children would most benefit from off-therapy imaging surveillance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cairo MS, Beishuizen A (2019) Childhood, adolescent and young adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma: current perspectives. Br J Haematol 185:1021–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Patte C, Auperin A, Gerrard M et al (2007) Results of the randomized international FAB/LMB96 trial for intermediate risk B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adolescents: it is possible to reduce treatment for the early responding patients. Blood 109:2773–2780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cairo MS, Pinkerton R (2016) Childhood, adolescent and young adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma: state of the science. Br J Haematol 173:507–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cairo MS, Sposto R, Gerrard M et al (2012) Advanced stage, increased lactate dehydrogenase, and primary site, but not adolescent age (>/= 15 years), are associated with an increased risk of treatment failure in children and adolescents with mature B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of the FAB LMB 96 study. J Clin Oncol 30:387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giulino-Roth L, Keller FG, Hodgson DC et al (2015) Current approaches in the management of low risk Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adolescents. Br J Haematol 169:647–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldman S, Smith L, Anderson JR et al (2013) Rituximab and FAB/LMB 96 chemotherapy in children with stage III/IV B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a Children's Oncology Group report. Leukemia 27:1174–1177

  7. Goldman S, Smith L, Galardy P et al (2014) Rituximab with chemotherapy in children and adolescents with central nervous system and/or bone marrow-positive Burkitt lymphoma/leukaemia: a Children's Oncology Group report. Br J Haematol 167:394–401

  8. Hochberg J, Cairo MS (2018) Lymphoma in adolescents and young adults: current perspectives. Cancer J 24:285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelly KM, Hodgson D, Appel B et al (2013) Children's oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: Hodgkin lymphoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60:972–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith MA, Altekruse SF, Adamson PC et al (2014) Declining childhood and adolescent cancer mortality. Cancer 120:2497–2506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaste SC (2011) Oncological imaging: tumor surveillance in children. Pediatr Radiol 41:505–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Voss SD, Reaman GH, Kaste SC et al (2009) The ALARA concept in pediatric oncology. Pediatr Radiol 39:1142–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McHugh K, Roebuck DJ (2014) Pediatric oncology surveillance imaging: two recommendations. Abandon CT scanning, and randomize to imaging or solely clinical follow-up. Pediatr Blood Cancer 61:3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keller FG, Castellino SM, Chen L et al (2018) Results of the AHOD0431 trial of response adapted therapy and a salvage strategy for limited stage, classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Cancer 124:3210–3219

  15. Rathore N, Eissa HM, Margolin JF et al (2012) Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: are we over-scanning our patients? Pediatr Hematol Oncol 29:415–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Voss SD (2013) Surveillance imaging in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 8:218–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Banerjee P, Rossi MG, Anghelescu DL et al (2019) Association between anesthesia exposure and neurocognitive and neuroimaging outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JAMA Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1094

  18. Howell L, Mensah A, Brennan B et al (2005) Detection of recurrence in childhood solid tumors. Cancer 103:1274–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Voss SD, Chen L, Constine LS et al (2012) Surveillance computed tomography imaging and detection of relapse in intermediate- and advanced-stage pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 30:2635–2640

  20. Friedmann AM, Wolfson JA, Hudson MM et al (2013) Relapse after treatment of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: outcome and role of surveillance after end of therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60:1458–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Satwani P, Jin Z, Martin PL et al (2015) Sequential myeloablative autologous stem cell transplantation and reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is safe and feasible in children, adolescents and young adults with poor-risk refractory or recurrent Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Leukemia 29:448–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kapke JT, Epperla N, Shah N et al (2017) Effect of routine surveillance imaging on the outcomes of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 17:408–414

  23. Sandlund JT (2015) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in children. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 10:237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cairo M, Auperin A, Perkins SL et al (2018) Overall survival of children and adolescents with mature B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma who had refractory or relapsed disease during or after treatment with FAB/LMB 96: a report from the FAB/LMB 96 study group. Br J Haematol 182:859–869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosolen A, Perkins SL, Pinkerton CR et al (2015) Revised international pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma staging system. J Clin Oncol 33:2112–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sandlund JT, Guillerman RP, Perkins SL et al (2015) International pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma response criteria. J Clin Oncol 33:2106–2111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Eissa HM, Allen CE, Kamdar K et al (2014) Pediatric Burkitt's lymphoma and diffuse B-cell lymphoma: are surveillance scans required? Pediatr Hematol Oncol 31:253–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. El-Galaly TC, Jakobsen LH, Hutchings M et al (2015) Routine imaging for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in first complete remission does not improve post-treatment survival: a Danish-Swedish population-based study. J Clin Oncol 33:3993–3998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahmed BA, Connolly BL, Shroff P et al (2010) Cumulative effective doses from radiologic procedures for pediatric oncology patients. Pediatrics 126:e851–e858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Robbins E (2008) Radiation risks from imaging studies in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:453–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chong AL, Grant RM, Ahmed BA et al (2010) Imaging in pediatric patients: time to think again about surveillance. Pediatr Blood Cancer 55:407–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Goldman S, Barth M, Hochberg J et al (2018) Reduced burden of oncologic therapy in children, adolescents and young adults with good risk (GR) CD20+ mature B-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 182:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hochberg JC, Klejmont L, Harrison L et al (2018) Brentuximab vedotin and rituximab with reduced toxicity chemotherapy in children, adolescents and young adults with newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 182:91

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bhakta N, Liu Q, Ness KK et al (2017) The cumulative burden of surviving childhood cancer: an initial report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study (SJLIFE). Lancet 390:2569–2582

  35. Bhatia S, Robison LL, Oberlin O et al (1996) Breast cancer and other second neoplasms after childhood Hodgkin's disease. N Engl J Med 334:745–751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bhatia S, Yasui Y, Robison LL et al (2003) High risk of subsequent neoplasms continues with extended follow-up of childhood Hodgkin's disease: report from the Late Effects Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:4386–4394

  37. Bluhm EC, Ronckers C, Hayashi RJ et al (2008) Cause-specific mortality and second cancer incidence after non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Blood 111:4014–4021

  38. Ehrhardt MJ, Sandlund JT, Zhang N et al (2017) Late outcomes of adult survivors of childhood non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 64

  39. Holmqvist AS, Chen Y, Berano Teh J et al (2019) Risk of solid subsequent malignant neoplasms after childhood Hodgkin lymphoma — identification of high-risk populations to guide surveillance: a report from the Late Effects Study Group. Cancer 125:1373–1383

  40. Ehrhardt MJ, Chen Y, Sandlund JT et al (2019) Late health outcomes following contemporary Lymphome Malin de Burkitt therapy for mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 8:JCO1900525

  41. Dorffel W, Riepenhausen M, Luders H et al (2016) Late effects following treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma during childhood and adolescence. Results of the Hodgkin lymphoma late effects research project. Klin Padiatr 228:286–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF et al (2014) Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol 32:3059–3068

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Erin Morris, RN, for her expert assistance in the preparation of the manuscript. Dr. Cairo was supported by the Pediatric Cancer Research Foundation and the Marisa Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan D. Voss.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Voss, S.D., Cairo, M.S. Surveillance imaging in pediatric lymphoma. Pediatr Radiol 49, 1565–1573 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04511-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04511-4

Keywords

Navigation