Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

If Disney ran your pediatric radiology department: a different approach to improving the patient and family experience

  • Minisymposium: Quality and safety
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concepts behind the patient experience and patient- and family-centered care have their roots in the 1980s. Prioritization and implementation of programs to improve the patient experience have received increased attention since the passage of legislation tying health insurance reimbursement to patient satisfaction surveys. Radiology has joined these efforts with the Radiology 3.0 initiative, and departments are applying established patient- and family-centered care models and quality-improvement methods to improve patient experience and satisfaction. While these approaches are valuable, they should be supplemented with more qualitative, humanistic and empathetic approaches. We present a “Disney model” for improving the patient and family experience in pediatric radiology and examples of practical implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rawson JV, Moretz J (2016) Patient- and family-centered care: a primer. J Am Coll Radiol 13:1544–1549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis K, Stremikis K, Squires D, Schoen C (2014) Mirror, mirror on the wall: how the performance of the U.S. health care system compares internationally. Commonw Fund 1–32

  3. Silva E, McGinty GB, Hughes DR, Duszak R (2016) Alternative payment models in radiology: the legislative and regulatory roadmap for reform. J Am Coll Radiol 13:1176–1181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jensen JD, Allen L, Blasko R, Nagy P (2016) Using quality improvement methods to improve patient experience. J Am Coll Radiol 13:1550–1554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Engel GL (1977) The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 196:129–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frampton S, Guastello S, Hale M et al (2008) Patient-centered care improvement guide. Picker Institute, Planetree, Derby

    Google Scholar 

  7. Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Itri JN (2015) Patient-centered radiology. Radiographics 35:1835–1846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee F (2004) If Disney ran your hospital: 9 1/2 things you would do differently. Second River Healthcare, Bozeman

  10. Arenson RL, Lu Y, Elliott SC et al (2001) Measuring the academic radiologist’s clinical productivity. applying RVU adjustment factors Acad Radiol 8:533–540

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly AM, Cronin P (2015) Practical approaches to quality improvement for radiologists. Radiographics 35:1630–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown T, Rowe PG (2008) Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev 86:252

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reichheld F (2006) Ultimate question: for driving good profits and true growth. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pine BJ, Gilmore JH (1998) Welcome to the experience economy. Harv Bus Rev https://hbr.org/1998/07/welcome-to-the-experience-economy. Accessed 14 Sept 2018

  15. Ellenbogen PH (2013) Imaging 3.0: what is it? J Am Coll Radiol 10:229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Allen TI, Rieck T, Salsbury S (2016) Patient perceptions of an AIDET and hourly rounding program in a community hospital: results of a qualitative study. Patient Exp J 3:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Studer Q (2003) Hardwiring excellence: purpose worthwhile work, making a difference. Fire Starter Publishing, Gulf Breeze

    Google Scholar 

  18. Winkel GH, Holahan CJ (1985) The environmental psychology of the hospital: is the cure worse than the illness? Prev Hum Serv 4:11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sze RW, Teshima S, Hogan L, Davidson S (2017) Radiology design project primer. J Am Coll Radiol S1546–1440:31443–31446

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sze RW, Hogan LJ, Jones YM (2017) A theater model for improving family experience in radiology. Radiol Manag 39:25–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Arianna Sze for creating the figures for this manuscript and Second River Healthcare for permission to modify and use the images for Figs. 1 and 2 from If Disney Ran Your Hospital: 9 ½ Things You Would Do Differently.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond W. Sze.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sze, R.W., Vera, C.D., Hogan, L. et al. If Disney ran your pediatric radiology department: a different approach to improving the patient and family experience. Pediatr Radiol 49, 493–499 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4308-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4308-4

Keywords

Navigation