Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Single-energy pediatric chest computed tomography with spectral filtration at 100 kVp: effects on radiation parameters and image quality

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Most of the applied radiation dose at CT is in the lower photon energy range, which is of limited diagnostic importance.

Objective

To investigate image quality and effects on radiation parameters of 100-kVp spectral filtration single-energy chest CT using a tin-filter at third-generation dual-source CT in comparison to standard 100-kVp chest CT.

Materials and methods

Thirty-three children referred for a non-contrast chest CT performed on a third-generation dual-source CT scanner were examined at 100 kVp with a dedicated tin filter with a tube current–time product resulting in standard protocol dose. We compared resulting images with images from children examined using standard single-source chest CT at 100 kVp. We assessed objective and subjective image quality and compared radiation dose parameters.

Results

Radiation dose was comparable for children 5 years old and younger, and it was moderately decreased for older children when using spectral filtration (P=0.006). Effective tube current increased significantly (P=0.0001) with spectral filtration, up to a factor of 10. Signal-to-noise ratio and image noise were similar for both examination techniques (P≥0.06). Subjective image quality showed no significant differences (P≥0.2).

Conclusion

Using 100-kVp spectral filtration chest CT in children by means of a tube-based tin-filter on a third-generation dual-source CT scanner increases effective tube current up to a factor of 10 to provide similar image quality at equivalent dose compared to standard single-source CT without spectral filtration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Yankelevitz DF et al (2001) Early lung cancer action project: initial findings on repeat screenings. Cancer 92:153–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Linton OW, Mettler FA Jr (2003) National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:321–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yates SJ, Pike LC, Goldstone KE (2004) Effect of multislice scanners on patient dose from routine CT examinations in East Anglia. Br J Radiol 77:472–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography — an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Lond Engl 380:499–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleischmann D, Boas FE (2011) Computed tomography — old ideas and new technology. Eur Radiol 21:510–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Greess H, Nömayr A, Wolf H et al (2002) Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose). Eur Radiol 12:1571–1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233:649–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stumpp P, Gosch D, Kühn A et al (2012) Performance of an automatic dose control system for CT: patient studies. RöFo 185:144–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Molinari F, Tack D, Boiselle P et al (2012) Radiation dose management in thoracic CT: an international survey. Diagn Interv Radiol 19:201–209

  13. Pourjabbar S, Singh S, Kulkarni N et al (2014) Dose reduction for chest CT: comparison of two iterative reconstruction techniques. Acta Radiol 56:688–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee SW, Kim Y, Shim SS et al (2014) Image quality assessment of ultra low-dose chest CT using sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol 24:817–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang H, Tan B, Zhao B et al (2013) Raw-data-based iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection: image quality of low-dose chest computed tomography examinations in 87 patients. Clin Imaging 37:1024–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C (1999) Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys 26:2248–2253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh S, Kalra MK, Moore MA et al (2009) Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 252:200–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haubenreisser H, Meyer M, Sudarski S et al (2015) Unenhanced third-generation dual-source chest CT using a tin filter for spectral shaping at 100 kVp. Eur J Radiol 84:1608–1613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Primak AN, Ramirez Giraldo JC, Liu X et al (2009) Improved dual-energy material discrimination for dual-source CT by means of additional spectral filtration. Med Phys 36:1359–1369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Gordic S, Morsbach F, Schmidt B et al (2014) Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping. Invest Radiol 49:465–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Braun FM, Johnson TRC, Sommer WH et al (2015) Chest CT using spectral filtration: radiation dose, image quality, and spectrum of clinical utility. Eur Radiol 25:1598–1606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 140:1–55

  23. Allen I, Seaman C (2007) Likert scales and data analyses. Health Manag Database 40:64

    Google Scholar 

  24. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) AAPM report 204: size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_204.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2017

  25. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saltybaeva N, Martini K, Frauenfelder T et al (2016) Organ dose and attributable cancer risk in lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. PLoS One 11, e0155722

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Martini K, Barth BK, Nguyen-Kim TDL et al (2016) Evaluation of pulmonary nodules and infection on chest CT with radiation dose equivalent to chest radiography: prospective intra-individual comparison study to standard dose CT. Eur J Radiol 85:360–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A et al (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jensen K, Aaløkken TM, Tingberg A et al (2016) Image quality in oncologic chest computerized tomography with iterative reconstruction: a phantom study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 40:351–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim Y, Kim YK, Lee BE et al (2015) Ultra-low-dose CT of the thorax using iterative reconstruction: evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:1197–1202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rompel O, Glöckler M, Janka R et al (2016) Third-generation dual-source 70-kVp chest CT angiography with advanced iterative reconstruction in young children: image quality and radiation dose reduction. Pediatr Radiol 46:462–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University of Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany

    Boris Bodelle, Constanze Fischbach, Christian Booz, Ibrahim Yel, Claudia Frellesen, Moritz Kaup, Martin Beeres, Thomas J. Vogl & Jan-Erik Scholtz

Authors
  1. Boris Bodelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Constanze Fischbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian Booz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ibrahim Yel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Claudia Frellesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Moritz Kaup
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Martin Beeres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Thomas J. Vogl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jan-Erik Scholtz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Bodelle.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bodelle, B., Fischbach, C., Booz, C. et al. Single-energy pediatric chest computed tomography with spectral filtration at 100 kVp: effects on radiation parameters and image quality. Pediatr Radiol 47, 831–837 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3813-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3813-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation