Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

If it is published in the peer-reviewed literature, it must be true?

  • Image Gently ALARA CT summit: how to use new CT technologies for children
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Epidemiological research correlating cancer rates in a population of patients with radiation doses from medical X-rays is fraught with confounding factors that obfuscate the likelihood that any positive relationship is causal. This is a review of four studies involving some of those confounding factors. Comparisons of findings with other studies not encumbered by similar confounding factors can enhance assertions of causation between medical X-rays and cancer rates. Even so, such assertions rest significantly on opinions of researchers regarding the degree of consistency between findings among various studies. The question as to what degree any findings truly represent cause and effect will likely still meet with controversy. The importance of these findings to medicine should therefore not lie in any controversy regarding causation, but in what the findings potentially mean with regard to benefit and risk for patients and the professional practice of medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gould SJ (1986) A short way to big ends. Nat Hist 95:18–28

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shah D (2009) Healthy worker effect phenomenon. India J Occup Environ Med 13:77–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Muirhead CR, O’Hagan JA, Haylock RGE et al (2009) Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. Br J Cancer 100:206–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Eisenberg MJ, Afilalo J, Lawler PR et al (2011) Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction. CMAJ 183:430–436

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. (2011) Letters to Editor. CMAJ. http://www.cmaj.ca/content/183/4/430/reply. Accessed 18 April 2014

  6. National Research Council of the National Academies (2006) Biological effects of ionizing radiations (BEIR VII Phase 2). National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer facts and figures 2012. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hujoel PP, Bollen AM, Noonan CJ et al (2004) Antepartum dental radiography and infant low birth weight. JAMA 291:1987–1993

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boice JD, Mulvihill JJ, Stovall M et al (2004) Dental X-rays and low birth weight (letter). J Radiol Prot 24:321–325

  10. Brent RL (2005) Commentary on low birth weight and dental X rays. Health Phys 88:379–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Offenbacher S, Katz V, Fertik G et al (1996) Periodontal infection as a possible risk factor for preterm low birth weight. J Periodontol 67:1103–1113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeffcoat MK, Geurs NC, Reddy MS et al (2001) Current evidence regarding periodontal disease as a risk factor in preterm birth. Ann Periodontol 6:183–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeffcoat MK, Geurs NC, Reddy MS et al (2001) Periodontal infection and preterm birth: results of a prospective study. J Am Dent Assoc 132:875–880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. Br Med J 346:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. (2013) Radiation Effects Research Foundation. Report series (1993–2013). http://www.rerf.jp/library/archives_e/rrtoc.html. Accessed 18 April 2014

  17. Kendall GM, Little MP, Wakeford R et al (2013) A record-based case–control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980–2006. Leukemia 27:3–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. MacMahon B (1985) Prenatal X-ray exposure and twins. N Engl J Med 312:576–577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Inskip PD, Mellemkjaer L, Gridley G et al (1998) Incidence of intracranial tumors following hospitalization for head injuries (Denmark). Cancer Causes Control 9:109–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Preston-Martin S, Pogoda JM, Schlehofer B et al (1998) An international case–control study of adult glioma and meningioma: the role of head trauma. Int J Epidemiol 27:579–586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nygren C, Adami J, Ye W et al (2001) Primary brain tumors following traumatic brain injury — a population-based cohort study in Sweden. Cancer Causes Control 12:733–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Council on Foreign Relations (2014) Vaccine-preventable outbreaks, 2008–2014. http://www.cfr.org/interactives/GH_Vaccine_Map/#/intro. Accessed 18 April 2014

Download references

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Wagner declares a financial interest as a partner in RM Partnership and has no investigational or off-label uses to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis K. Wagner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, L.K. If it is published in the peer-reviewed literature, it must be true?. Pediatr Radiol 44 (Suppl 3), 468–474 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3019-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3019-8

Keywords

Navigation