Skip to main content
Log in

Intestinal lesions in pediatric Crohn disease: comparative detectability among pulse sequences at MR enterography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Variable sequences can be used in MR enterography, and no consensus exists for the best protocol in children with Crohn disease.

Objective

To compare the lesion detectability of various MR enterography sequences and to correlate the findings of these sequences with the Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) in children with Crohn disease.

Materials and methods

Children with clinically or pathologically confirmed Crohn disease underwent MR enterography, including a single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) sequence, motility imaging (coronal 2-D balanced fast field echo), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast enhancement imaging (including arterial, portal and delayed phases). The lesion detectability of each sequence was graded 0–2 for each involved bowel segment. The lesion detectability and PCDAI result on different sequences were compared using the weighted least squares method and Student’s t-test, respectively.

Results

Fifteen children (11 boys, 4 girls, mean age 13.7 ± 1.4 years) with a total of 41 lesions were included in this study. All lesions detected in more than two sequences were visible on the single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) sequence. The relative lesion detection rate was 78.1% on motility imaging, 90.2% on DWI, and 92.7% on arterial, 95.1% on portal and 95.1% on delayed phase imaging. Compared to the SSFSE sequence, motility imaging (P < 0.001) and DWI (P = 0.039) demonstrated lower detectability. The mean PCDAI result in the detected lesions was statistically higher only on dynamic enhancement imaging (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

All MR enterography sequences were found to have relatively high lesion detectability in children with Crohn disease, while motility imaging showed the lowest lesion detectability. Lesions detected on dynamic enhancement imaging showed a higher PCDAI result, which suggests that this sequence is specific for active inflammation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diefenbach KA, Breuer CK (2006) Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 12:3204–3212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hyams JS (2005) Inflammatory bowel disease. Pediatr Rev 26:314–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sawczenko A, Sandhu BK, Logan RF et al (2001) Prospective survey of childhood inflammatory bowel disease in the British Isles. Lancet 357:1093–1094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaca AM, Jaffe TA, Delaney S et al (2008) Radiation doses from small-bowel follow-through and abdomen/pelvis MDCT in pediatric Crohn disease. Pediatr Radiol 38:285–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Castiglione F, Mainenti PP, De Palma GD et al (2013) Noninvasive diagnosis of small bowel Crohn’s disease: direct comparison of bowel sonography and magnetic resonance enterography. Inflamm Bowel Dis 19:991–998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Calabrese E, Zorzi F, Onali S et al (2013) Accuracy of small-intestine contrast ultrasonography, compared with computed tomography enteroclysis, in characterizing lesions in patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:950–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paredes JM, Ripolles T, Cortes X et al (2013) Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: usefulness in the assessment of postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis 7:192–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ripolles T, Rausell N, Paredes JM et al (2013) Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for characterisation of intestinal inflammation in Crohn’s disease: a comparison with surgical histopathology analysis. J Crohns Colitis 7:120–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pallotta N, Civitelli F, Di Nardo G et al (2013) Small intestine contrast ultrasonography in pediatric Crohn’s disease. J Pediatr 163:778–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmermann EM, Al-Hawary MM (2011) MRI of the small bowel in patients with Crohn’s disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 27:132–138

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gee MS, Nimkin K, Hsu M et al (2011) Prospective evaluation of MR enterography as the primary imaging modality for pediatric Crohn disease assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:224–231

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hyams JS, Ferry GD, Mandel FS et al (1991) Development and validation of a pediatric Crohn’s disease activity index. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 12:439–447

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baumgart DC, Sandborn WJ (2012) Crohn’s disease. Lancet 380:1590–1605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Magnano G, Granata C, Barabino A et al (2003) Polyethylene glycol and contrast-enhanced MRI of Crohn’s disease in children: preliminary experience. Pediatr Radiol 33:385–391

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SS, Kim AY, Yang SK et al (2009) Crohn disease of the small bowel: comparison of CT enterography, MR enterography, and small-bowel follow-through as diagnostic techniques. Radiology 251:751–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ (2007) European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease. Gut 56:161–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Otley A, Loonen H, Parekh N et al (1999) Assessing activity of pediatric Crohn’s disease: which index to use? Gastroenterology 116:527–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Toma P, Granata C, Magnano G et al (2007) CT and MRI of paediatric Crohn disease. Pediatr Radiol 37:1083–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fidler JL, Guimaraes L, Einstein DM (2009) MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiographics 29:1811–1825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:2078–2086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Nardo G, Aloi M, Oliva S et al (2012) Investigation of small bowel in pediatric Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 18:1760–1776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dillman JR, Stidham RW, Higgins PD et al (2013) US elastography-derived shear wave velocity helps distinguish acutely inflamed from fibrotic bowel in a Crohn disease animal model. Radiology 267:757–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sinha R, Verma R, Verma S et al (2011) MR enterography of Crohn disease: part 1, rationale, technique, and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:76–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Casciani E, Masselli G, Di Nardo G et al (2011) MR enterography versus capsule endoscopy in paediatric patients with suspected Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol 21:823–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ippolito D, Invernizzi F, Galimberti S et al (2010) MR enterography with polyethylene glycol as oral contrast medium in the follow-up of patients with Crohn disease: comparison with CT enterography. Abdom Imaging 35:563–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J et al (2002) MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 12:2651–2658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J et al (2001) MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. Radiographics 21 Spec No:S161–172

    Google Scholar 

  29. Froehlich JM, Waldherr C, Stoupis C et al (2010) MR motility imaging in Crohn’s disease improves lesion detection compared with standard MR imaging. Eur Radiol 20:1945–1951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Oto A, Zhu F, Kulkarni K et al (2009) Evaluation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection of bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease. Acad Radiol 16:597–603

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kiryu S, Dodanuki K, Takao H et al (2009) Free-breathing diffusion-weighted imaging for the assessment of inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:880–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oussalah A, Laurent V, Bruot O et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance without bowel preparation for detecting colonic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 59:1056–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oto A, Kayhan A, Williams JT et al (2011) Active Crohn’s disease in the small bowel: evaluation by diffusion weighted imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:615–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Goo HW (2010) Whole-body MRI of neuroblastoma. Eur J Radiol 75:306–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gu J, Chan T, Zhang J et al (2011) Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging: the added value to whole-body MRI at initial diagnosis of lymphoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W384–W391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA et al (2002) Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 222:652–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pauls S, Gabelmann A, Schmidt SA et al (2006) Evaluating bowel wall vascularity in Crohn’s disease: a comparison of dynamic MRI and wideband harmonic imaging contrast-enhanced low MI ultrasound. Eur Radiol 16:2410–2417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E et al (2006) Assessment of Crohn’s disease in the small bowel: prospective comparison of magnetic resonance enteroclysis with conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 16:2817–2827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Horsthuis K, Lavini C, Bipat S et al (2009) Perianal Crohn disease: evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging as an indicator of disease activity. Radiology 251:380–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Alexopoulou E, Roma E, Loggitsi D et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel in children with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease: evaluation of disease activity. Pediatr Radiol 39:791–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Knuesel PR, Kubik RA, Crook DW et al (2010) Assessment of dynamic contrast enhancement of the small bowel in active Crohn’s disease using 3D MR enterography. Eur J Radiol 73:607–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Taylor SA, Punwani S, Rodriguez-Justo M et al (2009) Mural Crohn disease: correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging findings with angiogenesis and inflammation at histologic examination – pilot study. Radiology 251:369–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi-Jung Lee.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(AVI 82211 kb)

ESM 2

(AVI 98653 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sohn, B., Kim, MJ., Koh, H. et al. Intestinal lesions in pediatric Crohn disease: comparative detectability among pulse sequences at MR enterography. Pediatr Radiol 44, 821–830 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2902-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2902-7

Keywords

Navigation