Skip to main content
Log in

Radiation dose evaluation in head and neck MDCT examinations with a 6-year-old child anthropomorphic phantom

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

CT examinations of the head and neck are the most commonly performed CT studies in children, raising concern about radiation dose and their risks to children.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to clarify radiation dose levels for children of 6 years of age undergoing head and neck multidetector CT (MDCT) examinations.

Materials and methods

Radiation doses were measured with small-sized silicon-photodiode dosimeters that were implanted at various tissue and organ positions within a standard 6-year-old anthropomorphic phantom. Organ and effective doses of brain CT were evaluated for 19 protocols in nine hospitals on various (2–320 detector rows) MDCT scanners.

Results

The maximum value of mean organ dose in brain CT was 34.3 mGy for brain. Maximum values of mean doses for the radiosensitive lens and thyroid were 32.7 mGy for lens in brain CT and 17.2 mGy for thyroid in neck CT. seventy-fifth percentile of effective dose distribution in brain CT was approximately the same as the diagnostic reference level (DRL) in the 2003 UK survey.

Conclusion

The results of this study would encourage revision of MDCT protocols in pediatric head and neck CT examinations for dose reduction and protocol standardization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawaura C, Aoyama T, Koyama S et al (2006) Organ and effective dose evaluation in diagnostic radiology based on in-phantom dose measurements with novel photodiode-dosemeters. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 118:421–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McLean D, Malitz N, Lewis S (2003) Survey of effective dose levels from typical pediatric CT protocols. Australas Radiol 47:135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pages J, Buls N, Osteaux M (2003) CT doses in children: multicentre study. Br J Radiol 76:803–811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miyazaki O, Kitamura M, Masaki H et al (2005) Current practice of pediatric MDCT in Japan: survey results of demographics and age-based dose reduction. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 65:216–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Galanski M, Nagel HD, Stamm G (2007) Paediatric CT exposure practice in the federal republic of Germany: results of a nationwide survey in 2005–2006. Available at http://www.mh-hannover.de/fileadmin/kliniken/diagnostische_radiologie/download/Report_German_Paed-CT-Survey_2005_06.pdf. Accessed 14 Sep 2009

  7. Arch ME, Frush DP (2008) Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. AJR 191:611–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Verdun FR, Gutierrez D, Vader JP et al (2008) CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland. Eur Radiol 18:1980–1986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brisse HJ, Aubert B (2009) CT exposure from pediatric MDCT: results from the 2007–2008 SFIPP/ISRN survey. J Radiol 90:207–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Munk RD, Strohm PC, Saueressig U et al (2009) Effective dose estimation in whole-body multislice CT in paediatric trauma patients. Pediatr Radiol 39:245–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nishizawa K, Matsumoto M, Iwai K et al (2004) Survey of CT practice in Japan and collective effective dose estimation. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 64:151–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghotbi N, Ohtsuru A, Ogawa Y et al (2006) Pediatric CT scan usage in Japan: results of a hospital survey. Radiat Med 24:560–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. ICRP (1991) ICRP Publication 60: the 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Elsevier Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  14. ICRP (2007) ICRP Publication 103: The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Annals of the ICRP 37(2-3). Elsevier Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hiraoka T (1999) The basic data of materials for human body phantom. Iyou Hyoujun Senryou 4:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fujii K, Aoyama T, Koyama S et al (2007) Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations. Br J Radiol 80:657–667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. ImPACT-CT patient dosimetry calculator version 1.0. (2009) http://www.impactscan.org. St George’s Hospital, London, UK. Accessed 14 Sep 2009

  18. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA et al (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 32:228–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fearon T, Vucich J (1987) Normalized pediatric organ-absorbed doses from CT examinations. AJR 148:171–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazonakis M, Tzedakis A, Damilakis J et al (2007) Thyroid dose from common head and neck CT examinations in children: is there an excess risk for thyroid cancer induction? Eur Radiol 17:1352–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tack D, Gevenois PA (eds) (2007) Radiation dose from adult and pediatric multidetector computed tomography. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fujii K, Aoyama T, Yamauchi-Kawaura C et al (2009) Radiation dose evaluation in 64-slice CT examinations with adult and pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol 82:1010–1018

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nishizawa K, Mori S, Ohno M et al (2008) Patient dose estimation for multi-detector-row CT examinations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 128:98–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chapple CL, Willis S, Frame J (2002) Effective dose in paediatric computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 47:107–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA et al (2005) Doses from computed tomography (CT) examination in UK-2003 review. Report NRPB-W67. NRPB Publication at http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1194947420292. Accessed 14 Sep 2009

  27. Thomas KE, Wang B (2008) Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children’s hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method. Pediatr Radiol 38:645–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. ICRP (1997) ICRP Publication 73: radiological protection and safety in medicine. Annals of the ICRP 261. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  29. Huda W, Lieberman KA, Chang J et al (2004) Patient size and x-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. I. Radiation doses. Med Phys 31:588–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported in part by a Grant-In-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 18510043) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiyo Yamauchi-Kawaura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamauchi-Kawaura, C., Fujii, K., Aoyama, T. et al. Radiation dose evaluation in head and neck MDCT examinations with a 6-year-old child anthropomorphic phantom. Pediatr Radiol 40, 1206–1214 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1495-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1495-z

Keywords

Navigation