Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative Evaluation of Right Ventricular Workload Based on the Stroke Work Index in Patients after Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction

  • Research
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evaluation of right ventricular workload is sometimes complicated in patients after right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction (RVOTR) because both stenotic and regurgitation lesions are involved. In this study, we modified the right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI) and evaluated the relationship between the modified RVSWI (mRVSWI) and patient prognosis after RVOTR.We enrolled 69 patients who underwent RVOTR (the RVOTR group), including those who needed early reoperation (early reoperation subgroup) and those who did not (follow-up subgroup), and 13 age-matched control participants (control group). Based on the catheterization results 1 year after RVOTR, we compared the mRVSWI between these groups. Additionally, we evaluated the influence of the mRVSWI on the reoperation avoidance rate and survival.The mRVSWI in the RVOTR group was significantly greater than that in the control group (17.7 ± 8.6 vs. 11.0 ± 2.7 g·m/m2, p = 0.008). The mRVSWI in the early reoperation subgroup was significantly greater than that in the follow-up subgroup (32.5 ± 11.1 vs. 15.8 ± 6.0 g·m/m2, p < 0.0001). In the follow-up subgroup, patients with an mRVSWI higher than the upper limit of normal (16.4 g·m/m2) had a greater rate of reoperation than did the other patients (p = 0.0013). One patient died suddenly, and her mRVSWI was consistently high throughout her life.We established the mRVSWI as an index that integrates the pressure and volume load on the right ventricle. Our results indicate the utility of the mRVSWI for predicting patient prognosis after RVOTR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lillehei CW, Cohen M, Warden HE, Read RC, Aust JB, Dewall RA, Varco RL (1955) Direct vision intracardiac surgical correction of the tetralogy of Fallot, pentalogy of Fallot, and pulmonary atresia defects; repot of first ten cases. Ann Surg 142(3):418–442. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-195509000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith CA, McCracken C, Thomas AS, Spector LG, St Louis JD, Oster ME, Moller JH, Kochilas L (2019) Long-term outcomes of tetralogy of Fallot: a study from the pediatric cardiac care consortium. JAMA Cardiol 4(1):34–41. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prieto LR, Latson LA (2022) Pulmonary Stenosis. In: Shaddy RE (ed) Moss and Adams’ heart disease in infants, children and adolescents including the fetus and young adult, 10th edn. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, pp 940–963

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bhagra CJ, Hickey EJ, Bruaene AVD, Roche SL, Horlick EM, Wald RM (2017) Pulmonary valve procedures late after repair of tetralogy of fallot: current perspectives and contemporary approaches to management. Can J Cardiol 33(9):1138–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2017.06.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oosterhof T, van Straten A, Vliegen HW, Meijboom FJ, van Dijk APJ, Spijkerboer AM, Bouma BJ, Zwinderman AH, Hazekamp MG, de Roos A, Mulder BJM (2007) Preoperative thresholds for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with corrected tetralogy of fallot using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 116(5):545–551. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.659664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karamlow T, Silber I, Lao R, McCrindle BW, Harris L, Downar E, Webb GD, Colman JM, van Arsdell GS, Williams WG (2006) Outcomes after late reoperation in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: the impact of arrhythmia and arrhythmia surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 81(5):1786–1793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.12.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, Bozkurt B, Broberg CS, Colman JM, Crumb SR, Dearani JA, Fuller S, Gurvitz M, Khairy P, Landzberg MJ, Saidi A, Valente AM, Van Hare GF (2019) 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: exclusive summary. Circulation 139(14):e637

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baumgartner H, De Backer J, Babu-Narayan SV, Budts W, Chessa M, Diller GP, Lung B, Kluin J, Lang IM, Meijboom F, Moons P, Mulder BJM, Oechslin E, Roos-Hesselink JW, Schwerzmann M, Sondergaard L, Zeppenfeld K, ESC Scientific Document Group (2021) 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J 42(6):563–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fukamachi K, McCarghy PM, Smedira NG, Vargo RL, Starling RC, Young JB (1999) Preoperative risk factors for right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion. Ann Thorac Surg 68(6):2181–2184. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00753-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ochiai Y, McCarthy PM, Smedira NG, Banbury MK, Navia JL, Feng J, Hsu AP, Yeager ML, Buda T, Hoercher KJ, Howard MW, Takagaki M, Doi K, Fukamachi K (2002) Predictors of severe right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist divice insertion analysis of 245 patients. Circulation 106(12 suppl 1): I198-I202

  11. Schenk S, McCarthy PM, Blackstone EH, Feng J, Starling RC, Navia J, Zhou L, Hoercher KJ, Smedira NG, Fukamachi K (2006) Duration of inotropic support after left ventricular assist device implantation: Risk factors and impact on outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131(2):447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.09.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matthews JC, Koelling TM, Pagani FD, Aaronson KD (2008) The right ventricular failure risk score a pre-operative tool for assessing the risk of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device candidates. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(22):2163–2172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Imamura T, Kinugawa K, Kinoshita O, Nawata K, Ono M (2016) High pulmonary vascular resistance in addition to low right ventricular stroke work index effectively predicts biventricular assist device requirement. J Artif Organs 19(1):44–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-015-0867-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morgan JA, Paone G, Nemeh HW, Murthy R, Williams CT, Lanfear DE, Tita C, Brewer RJ (2013) Impact of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support on right ventricular function. J Heart Lung Transplant 32(4):398–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2012.12.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ibe T, Wada H, Sakakura K, Ito M, Ugata Y, Yamamoto K, Taniguchi Y, Momomura S, Fujita H (2018) Right ventricular stroke work index as a prognostic indicator for pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Int Heart J 59(5):1047–1051. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.17-576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Armstrong HF, Schulze PC, Kato TS, Bacchetta M, Thirapatarapong W, Bartels MN (2013) Right ventricular stroke work index as a negative predictor of mortality and initial hospital stay after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 32(6):603–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2013.03.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Grossman W, Moscucci M (2021) Evaluation of systolic and diastolic function of the ventricles and myocardium: Grossman & Baim’s Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention, 9th edn. Lippincott, Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, pp 473–95

    Google Scholar 

  18. Graham TP Jr, Jarmakani JM, Atwood GF, Canent RV Jr (1973) Right ventricular volume determinations in children: normal values and observations with volume or pressure overload. Circulation 47(1):144–153. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.47.1.144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jentzer JC, Anavekar NS, Burstein BJ, Borlaug BA, Oh JK (2020) Noninvasive echocardiographic left ventricular stroke work index predicts mortality in cardiac intensive care unit patients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 13(11):e011642. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.011642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karunanithi MK, Michniewicz J, Copeland SE, Feneley MP (1992) Right ventricular preload recruitable stroke work, end-systolic pressure−volume, and dP/dtmax−end-diastolic volume relations compared as indexes of right ventricular contractile performance in conscious dogs. Circ Res 70(6):1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.70.6.1169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hon JKF, Steendijk P, Khan H, Wong K, Yacoub M (2001) Acute effects of pulmonary artery banding in sheep on right ventricle pressure−volume relations: relevance to the arterial switch operation. Acta Physiol Scand 172(2):97–106. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-201X.2001.00844.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to study design. TH, MT, AK and YH collected and analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. FS, KM and KI revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Honda.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 20 kb)

246_2024_3499_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Supplementary file2 (TIF 164 kb)— Supplemental Figure 1. The relationship between the RVSWI and mRVSWI. The relationship between the RVSWI and mRVSWI in the RVOTR group is shown. The data of patients with RVOTS with a difference of 20 mmHg or more between the RVSP and systolic pulmonary artery pressure are shown as red dots, and the data of patients without RVOTS are shown as black dots. This scatterplot demonstrated that the ratio of RVSWI to mRVSWI is lower in patients with RVOTS than those without RVOTS, strongly indicating that the RVSWI underestimates right ventricular stroke work in patients with RVOTS.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Honda, T., Takanashi, M., Kitagawa, A. et al. Quantitative Evaluation of Right Ventricular Workload Based on the Stroke Work Index in Patients after Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction. Pediatr Cardiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03499-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03499-5

Keywords

Navigation