Skip to main content
Log in

Inter-observer and Inter-vendor Variability in Strain Measurements in Patients with Single Right Ventricular Anatomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Myocardial strain offers new insights into ventricular performance, There are software packages from several different companies used to ascertain this, and little data is available in patients with single right ventricle (sRV) physiology. We aimed to compare the analysis of two strain software applications using a cohort of patients with sRV for both inter-vendor and inter-observer variability. Echocardiograms from 85 patients with sRV (122 separate studies) were prospectively evaluated. All had Glenn and/or Fontan palliation. Longitudinal 4-chamber (4LS), inflow/outflow (IO), circumferential, and radial strain were assessed using Velocity Vector Imaging (VVI, Seimens, Munich) and Automated Functional Imaging (AFI, General Electric, Boston) software. In a subset of 45 patients (61 separate studies), strain measurements were obtained by two sonographers so a paired “inter-observer” analysis could be performed. A moderate correlation between measurements made by the two systems was observed. Circumferential strain assessment had the highest R value (0.77) with all others having R values < 0.6. Both software packages showed modest inter-observer reproducibility for longitudinal and circumferential strain. VVI intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for 4LS and average circumferential strain (ACS) were 0.6 and 0.58, compared to 0.68 and 0.59 for AFI. Other than radial strain and VVI IO inferior strain, mean strain differences between AFI and VVI were ≤ 1%. Inter-observer variability is modest, however, mean differences are minimal suggesting reasonable clinical reliability. Inter-vendor variability is greater and not as clinically reliable. In patients with sRV, serial assessments with strain should be performed using the same software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data are available upon request.

References

  1. Fixler DE, Nembhard WN, Salemi JL, Ethen MK, Canfield MA (2010) Mortality in first 5 years in infants with functional single ventricle born in Texas, 1996 to 2003. Circulation 121(5):644–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Simsic JM, Bradley SM, Stroud MR, Atz AM (2005) Risk factors for interstage death after the Norwood procedure. Pediatr Cardiol 26(4):400–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marino BS (2002) Outcomes after the Fontan procedure. Curr Opin Pediatr. 14(5):620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Francois K, Vandekerckhove K, De Groote K, Panzer J, De Wolf D, De Wilde H et al (2016) Current outcomes of the bi-directional cavopulmonary anastomosis in single ventricle patients: analysis of risk factors for morbidity and mortality, and suitability for Fontan completion. Cardiol Young 26(2):288–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cua CL, Feltes TF (2012) Echocardiographic evaluation of the single right ventricle in congenital heart disease: results of new techniques. Circ J 76(1):22–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Friedberg MK, Mertens L (2009) Tissue velocities, strain, and strain rate for echocardiographic assessment of ventricular function in congenital heart disease. Eur J Echocardiogr 10(5):585–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khoo NS, Tham EB, Kantor PF (2013) Newer imaging modalities in the assessment of heart function in single ventricle hearts. Can J Cardiol 29(7):886–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bansal M, Cho GY, Chan J, Leano R, Haluska BA, Marwick TH (2008) Feasibility and accuracy of different techniques of two-dimensional speckle based strain and validation with harmonic phase magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 21(12):1318–1325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Collier P, Phelan D, Klein A (2017) A test in context: myocardial strain measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 69(8):1043–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morris DA, Ma XX, Belyavskiy E, Aravind Kumar R, Kropf M, Kraft R et al (2017) Left ventricular longitudinal systolic function analysed by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis. Open Heart 4(2):e000630

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lorch SM, Ludomirsky A, Singh GK (2008) Maturational and growth-related changes in left ventricular longitudinal strain and strain rate measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in healthy pediatric population. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 21(11):1207–1215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Longobardo L, Suma V, Jain R, Carerj S, Zito C, Zwicke DL et al (2017) Role of two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography strain in the assessment of right ventricular systolic function and comparison with conventional parameters. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30(10):937–46.e6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grenne B, Eek C, Sjoli B, Dahlslett T, Uchto M, Hol PK et al (2010) Acute coronary occlusion in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: outcome and early identification by strain echocardiography. Heart 96(19):1550–1556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fine NM, Chen L, Bastiansen PM, Frantz RP, Pellikka PA, Oh JK et al (2015) Reference values for right ventricular strain in patients without cardiopulmonary disease: a prospective evaluation and meta-analysis. Echocardiography 32(5):787–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JH, Park JH (2018) Strain analysis of the right ventricle using two-dimensional echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Imaging 26(3):111–124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Moiduddin N, Texter KM, Zaidi AN, Hershenson JA, Stefaniak CA, Hayes J et al (2010) Two-dimensional speckle strain and dyssynchrony in single right ventricles versus normal right ventricles. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23(6):673–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Y, Wang Y, Ye X, Kong L, Zhu W, Lu X (2016) Clinical study of right ventricular longitudinal strain for assessing right ventricular dysfunction and hemodynamics in pulmonary hypertension. Medicine 95(50):e5668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Di Salvo G, Drago M, Pacileo G, Carrozza M, Santoro G, Bigazzi MC et al (2005) Comparison of strain rate imaging for quantitative evaluation of regional left and right ventricular function after surgical versus percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect. Am J Cardiol 96(2):299–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park PW, Atz AM, Taylor CL, Chowdhury SM (2017) Speckle-tracking echocardiography improves pre-operative risk stratification before the total cavopulmonary connection. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30(5):478–484

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Truong UT, Sun HY, Tacy TA (2013) Myocardial deformation in the fetal single ventricle. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26(1):57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maskatia SA, Pignatelli RH, Ayres NA, Altman CA, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Lee W (2016) Longitudinal changes and interobserver variability of systolic myocardial deformation values in a prospective cohort of healthy fetuses across gestation and after delivery. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 29(4):341–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh GK, Cupps B, Pasque M, Woodard PK, Holland MR, Ludomirsky A (2010) Accuracy and reproducibility of strain by speckle tracking in pediatric subjects with normal heart and single ventricular physiology: a 2D speckle tracking echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging correlative study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23(11):1143–1152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Khoo NS, Smallhorn JF, Kaneko S, Myers K, Kutty S, Tham EB (2011) Novel insights into RV adaptation and function in hypoplastic left heart syndrome between the first 2 stages of surgical palliation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4(2):128–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu YR, Zhang YQ, Chen LJ, Wang SS, Zhong SW, Zhang ZF (2014) Assessment of longitudinal systolic ventricular dysfunction and asynchrony using velocity vector imaging in children with a single right ventricle. Pediatr Cardiol 35(7):1147–1154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Farsalinos KE, Daraban AM, Unlu S, Thomas JD, Badano LP, Voigt JU (2015) Head-to-head comparison of global longitudinal strain measurements among nine different vendors: The EACVI/ASE inter-vendor comparison study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 28(10):1171–1181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nagata Y, Takeuchi M, Mizukoshi K, Wu VC, Lin FC, Negishi K et al (2015) Intervendor variability of two-dimensional strain using vendor-specific and vendor-independent software. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(6):630–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Negishi K, Lucas S, Negishi T, Hamilton J, Marwick TH (2013) What is the primary source of discordance in strain measurement between vendors: imaging or analysis? Ultrasound Med Biol 39(4):714–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leischik R, Dworrak B, Hensel K (2014) Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility for radial, circumferential and longitudinal strain echocardiography. Open Cardiovasc Med J 8:102–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mirea O, Pagourelias ED, Duchenne J, Bogaert J, Thomas JD, Badano LP et al (2018) Intervendor differences in the accuracy of detecting regional functional abnormalities: a report from the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11(1):25–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Risum N, Ali S, Olsen NT, Jons C, Khouri MG, Lauridsen TK et al (2012) Variability of global left ventricular deformation analysis using vendor dependent and independent two-dimensional speckle-tracking software in adults. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(11):1195–1203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zito C, Longobardo L, Citro R, Galderisi M, Oreto L, Carerj ML et al (2018) Ten years of 2D longitudinal strain for early myocardial dysfunction detection: a clinical overview. Biomed Res Int 2018:8979407

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Il’Giovine ZJ, Mulder H, Chiswell K, Arges K, Tomfohr J, Hashmi A et al (2018) Right ventricular longitudinal strain reproducibility using vendor-dependent and vendor-independent software. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 31(6):721–732

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Rios R, Ginde S, Saudek D, Loomba RS, Stelter J, Frommelt P (2017) Quantitative echocardiographic measures in the assessment of single ventricle function post-Fontan: incorporation into routine clinical practice. Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, NY) 34(1):108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the statistical support provided by Megan M. O'Byrne, MA for this study. This study was possible by clinical and administrative support by Wanek Family Program for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Imaging Pipeline: Timothy J. Nelson, MD, PhD, Dawit T. Haile, MD, Karen S. Miller, CCRP, Lori A. Riess, CCRP, Karen M. Cavanaugh, CCRP, Lucas Timmons, CCRP. *Wanek Family Program for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Imaging Pipeline: Timothy J. Nelson, MD, PhD, Dawit T. Haile, MD, Karen S. Miller, CCRP, Lori A. Riess, CCRP, Karen M. Cavanaugh, CCRP, Lucas Timmons, CCRP.

Funding

This study was supported by the Todd and Karen Wanek Program for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome, Mayo Clinic Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Yasir Qureshi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by an institutional review board of Mayo Clinic.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The Members of the study group Wanek Family Program for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Imaging Pipeline was present in Acknowledgements.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thompson, A.J., O’Leary, P.W., Miller, A. et al. Inter-observer and Inter-vendor Variability in Strain Measurements in Patients with Single Right Ventricular Anatomy. Pediatr Cardiol 42, 1341–1349 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02617-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02617-x

Keywords

Navigation