Skip to main content
Log in

In Silico Analyses Reveal the Relationship Between SIX1/EYA1 Mutations and Conotruncal Heart Defects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conotruncal heart defects (CTDs) represent a group of severe and complicated congenital cardiovascular malformations and require opportune clinical interventions once diagnosed. Occurrence of CTD is related to the functional abnormality of the second heart field (SHF), and variants of genes which regulate the development of the second heart field have been recognized as the main genetic factors leading to CTDs. Previous studies indicated that transcriptional complex SIX1/EYA1 may contribute to SHF development, and SIX1/EYA1 knockout mice exhibited a series of conotruncal malformations. Here, we recruited and sequenced 600 Chinese conotruncal heart defect patients and 300 controls. We screened out one novel SIX1 mutation (SIX1-K134R) and four EYA1 rare mutations (EYA1-A227T, EYA1-R296H, EYA1-Q397R, EYA1-G426S), all variants were present only in the case cohort, and the mutated sites were highly conserved. We then analyzed mutations by software including Sift, PolyPhen-2, PROVEAN, Mutation Taster, HOPE, and SWISS-PdbViewer. The results showed that the mutations had varying degrees of pathogenic risk, protein properties, spatial conformations, and domain functions which might be altered or influenced. Through biological and in silico analyses, our study suggests an association between SIX1/EYA1 mutations and cardiovascular malformations, SIX1/EYA1 mutations might be partially responsible for CTDs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Luca A, Sarkozy A, Ferese R et al (2011) New mutations in ZFPM2/FOG2 gene in tetralogy of Fallot and double outlet right ventricle. Clin Genet 80:184–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bentham J, Bhattacharya S (2008) Genetic mechanisms controlling cardiovascular development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1123:10–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheyette BN, Green PJ, Martin K, Garren H, Hartenstein V, Zipursky SL (1994) The Drosophila sine oculis locus encodes a homeodomain-containing protein required for the development of the entire visual system. Neuron 12:977–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Li X, Oghi KA, Zhang J et al (2003) Eya protein phosphatase activity regulates Six1-Dach-Eya transcriptional effects in mammalian organogenesis. Nature 426:247–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rayapureddi JP, Kattamuri C, Steinmetz BD et al (2003) Eyes absent represents a class of protein tyrosine phosphatases. Nature 426:295–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vincent C, Kalatzis V, Abdelhak S et al (1997) BOR and BO syndromes are allelic defects of EYA1. Eur J Hum Genet 5:242–246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang SH, Wu CC, Lu YC et al (2012) Mutation screening of the EYA1, SIX1, and SIX5 genes in an East Asian cohort with branchio-oto-renal syndrome. Laryngoscope 122:1130–1136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo C, Sun Y, Zhou B et al (2011) A Tbx1-Six1/Eya1-Fgf8 genetic pathway controls mammalian cardiovascular and craniofacial morphogenesis. J Clin Investig 121:1585–1595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shimasaki N, Watanabe K, Hara M, Kosaki K (2004) EYA1 mutation in a newborn female presenting with cardiofacial syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol 25:411–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Blue GM, Humphreys D, Szot J et al (2017) The promises and challenges of exome sequencing in familial, non-syndromic congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 230:155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Solayman M, Saleh MA, Paul S, Khalil MI, Gan SH (2017) In silico analysis of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms of the human adiponectin receptor 2 (ADIPOR2) gene. Comput Biol Chem 68:175–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Venselaar H, Te Beek TA, Kuipers RK, Hekkelman ML, Vriend G (2010) Protein structure analysis of mutations causing inheritable diseases. An e-Science approach with life scientist friendly interfaces. BMC Bioinform 11:548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li B, Pu T, Liu Y, Xu Y, Xu R (2017) CITED2 mutations in conserved regions contribute to conotruncal heart defects in Chinese children. DNA Cell Biol. doi:10.1089/dna.2017.3701

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S (2002) The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1890–1900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakajima Y (2010) Second lineage of heart forming region provides new understanding of conotruncal heart defects. Congenit Anom 50:8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ilagan R, Abu-Issa R, Brown D et al (2006) Fgf8 is required for anterior heart field development. Development 133:2435–2445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pacheco-Leyva I, Matias AC, Oliveira DV et al (2016) CITED2 cooperates with ISL1 and promotes cardiac differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rep 7:1037–1049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Baldini A, Fulcoli FG, Illingworth E (2017) Tbx1: transcriptional and developmental functions. Curr Top Dev Biol 122:223–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu PX, Woo I, Her H, Beier DR, Maas RL (1997) Mouse Eya homologues of the Drosophila eyes absent gene require Pax6 for expression in lens and nasal placode. Development 124:219–231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen B, Kim EH, Xu PX (2009) Initiation of olfactory placode development and neurogenesis is blocked in mice lacking both Six1 and Six4. Dev Biol 326:75–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rayapureddi JP, Hegde RS (2006) Branchio-oto-renal syndrome associated mutations in eyes absent 1 result in loss of phosphatase activity. FEBS Lett 580:3853–3859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81270233) and the Three Years’ Action of Shanghai Health Bureau (GWTV-23).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rang Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This research conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 2013 Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by local ethics committee of Xinhua Hospital.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, B., Xu, L., Hong, N. et al. In Silico Analyses Reveal the Relationship Between SIX1/EYA1 Mutations and Conotruncal Heart Defects. Pediatr Cardiol 39, 176–182 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-017-1744-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-017-1744-0

Keywords

Navigation