Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative assessment of the clinical efficacy of intranasal desmopressin spray and diclofenac in the treatment of renal colic

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of desmopressin nasal spray compared with diclofenac given intramuscularly in patients with acute renal colic caused by urolithiasis. The study included 72 patients randomized into three different groups: group A received desmopressin (40 mg, nasal spray), group B diclofenac (75 mg) intramuscularly and group C, both desmopressin and diclofenac. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale at baseline, 10, 30 min and 1 h after administering the treatments. Rescue analgesia was given at 30 min if needed. On admission, the pain level was the same in all three groups (group A 85; and group B and C 90 each). At 10 min the pain decreased minimally in all the groups but more in group B and C (group A 80 and group B and C 70 each). At 30 min pain scores were 75, 37.5 and 40 for group A, B and C, respectively, indicating that there was no significant pain relief in desmopressin group. Rescue analgesic had to be given to all patients in group A and two patients in group B and three patients in group C. Pain relief in the desmopressin only group was significantly less at 1 h even after rescue analgesia (pain scores of 27.5, 15 and 20 for group A, B and C respectively). Intranasal desmopressin is not an effective analgesic in renal colic: exerts mild analgesic effect over a period of 30 min. It does not potentiate the effect of diclofenac.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA (2007) Campbell-Walsh urology, 9th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, p 1213

  2. El-Sherif AE, Salem M, Yahia H, al-Sharkawy WA, al-Sayra M (1995) Treatment of renal colic by desmopressin intranasal spray and diclofenac sodium. J Urol 153:1395–1398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marumo F, Edelman IS (1971) Effect of Ca ++ and prostaglandin E1 on vasopressin activation of renal adenyl cyclase. J Clin Invest 50:1613–1620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grantham JJ, Orloff J (1968) Effect of prostaglandin E1 on the permeability response of the isolated collecting tubule to vasopressin, adenosine 3,5-monophosphate and theophylline. J Clin Invest 47:1154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grenabo L, Aurell M, Delin K, Holmlund D, Sjadin LG (1983) Antidiuretic hormone levels and the effect of indomethacin on ureteral colic. J Urol 129:941–943

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lopes T, Dias JS, Marchlero J (2001) An assessment of clinical efficacy of intranasal desmopressin spray in the treatment of renal colic. BJU Intern 87:322–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seif SM, Zenser TV, Clarochi FF, Davis BB, Robinson AG (1978) DDAVP (1-desamino-8-arginine-vasopressin) treatment of central diabetes incipidus- mechanism of prolonged antidiauresis. J Clin Endocr Metab 46:381–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rana BK, Shiina T, Insel PA (2001) Genetic variations and polymorphisms of G protein coupled receptors functional and therapeutic implications. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 41(2):593

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santosh Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Behera, N.C., Sarkar, D. et al. A comparative assessment of the clinical efficacy of intranasal desmopressin spray and diclofenac in the treatment of renal colic. Urol Res 39, 397–400 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0354-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0354-6

Keywords

Navigation