Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Anthropometric measurement and analysis of the lower face in Turkish rhinoplasty patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lower face dimensions have a great impact on the perception of nasal beauty. For this reason, evaluation of the lower face is important in patients applied for rhinoplasty. In this study, we aimed to describe the values of lower face anthropometric measurements in Turkish patients who applied for rhinoplasty and to compare these values with measurements of individuals who are pleased with their nasal appearance.

Methods

A Turkish population of 252 rhinoplasty-negative individuals and 171 rhinoplasty patients were included in this study as the control and rhinoplasty groups. Using the preoperative photographs of the facial profile, seven vertical measurements were taken and seven indices were used to determine the relationships between measurements of the lower face.

Results

In the rhinoplasty group, most vertical profile measurements were greater in males. The only variables with no gender differences were lower and upper vermilion heights. Only variables with a significant difference between two groups were upper lip vermilion height in females and upper lip height in males.

Conclusions

This study provides objective reference material for the evaluation of the lower face when planning for rhinoplasty. Besides, the differences found between two groups emphasize the importance of the nasolabial region when planning for rhinoplasty.

Level of Evidence: Level II, diagnostic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rhodes G (2006) The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol 57:199–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cellerino A (2003) Psychobiology of facial attractiveness. J Endocrinol Invest 26:45–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zaidel DW, Cohen JA (2005) The face, beauty, and symmetry: perceiving asymmetry in beautiful faces. Int J Neurosci 115:1165–1173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tessier P, Farkas LGMI (1987) Anthropometric facial proportions in medicine. Charles C Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edler R, Agarwal P, Wertheim D et al (2006) The use of anthropometric proportion indices in the measurement of facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 28:274–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stucker FJ Jr (1982) Management of the scoliotic nose. Laryngoscope 92:128–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vuyk HD (2000) A review of practical guidelines for correction of the deviated, asymmetric nose. Rhinology 38:72–78

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Farkas LG, Kolar JC, Munro IR (1986) Geography of the nose: a morphometric study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 10:191–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Choe KS, Yalamanchili HR, Litner JA et al (2006) The Korean American woman’s nose: an in-depth nasal photogrammatic analysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg 8:319–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ (1988) Management of the deviated nose. The importance of septal reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 15:43–55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Falces E, Wesser D, Gorney M (1970) Cosmetic surgery of the non-Caucasian nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 45:317–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RC et al (2002) Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Aesthetic Plast Surg 26:64–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Posen JM (1967) A longitudinal study of the growth of the nose. Am J Orthod 53:746–756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vegter F, Hage JJ (2000) Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1090–1096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR et al (2005) International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg 16:615–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Douglas TS (2004) Image processing for craniofacial landmark identification and measurement: a review of photogrammetry and cephalometry. Comput Med Imaging Graph 28:401–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuncel U, Turan A, Kostakoglu N (2013) Digital anthropometric shape analysis of 110 rhinoplasty patients in the Black Sea Region in Turkey. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41:98–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mishima K, Mori Y, Yamada T et al (2002) Anthropometric analysis of the nose in the Japanese. Cells Tissues Organs 170:198–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Porter JP, Olson KL (2003) Analysis of the African American female nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:620–626, discussion 627–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dong Y, Zhao Y, Bai S et al (2010) Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of the Chinese nose. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1832–1839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi JY, Park JH, Javidnia H et al (2013) Effect of various facial angles and measurements on the ideal position of the nasal tip in the Asian patient population. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 15:417–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jayaratne YS, Deutsch CK, Zwahlen RA (2014) Nasal morphology of the Chinese: three-dimensional reference values for rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150:956–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Anic-Milosevic S, Mestrovic S, Prlic A et al (2010) Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38:90–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bishara SE, Jorgensen GJ, Jakobsen JR (1995a) Changes in facial dimensions assessed from lateral and frontal photographs. Part I—methodology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108:389–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bishara SE, Jorgensen GJ, Jakobsen JR (1995b) Changes in facial dimensions assessed from lateral and frontal photographs. Part II—results and conclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108:489–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Hreczko TA et al (1984) Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults. Am J Orthod 86:52–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Park YC, Burstone CJ (1986) Soft-tissue profile—fallacies of hard-tissue standards in treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 90:52–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuen SW, Hiranaka DK (1989) A photographic study of the facial profiles of southern Chinese adolescents. Quintessence Int 20:665–676

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fernandez-Riveiro P, Suarez-Quintanilla D, Smyth-Chamosa E et al (2002) Linear photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 122:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Arnett GW, Bergman RT (1993) Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning—part II. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 103:395–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Legan HL, Burstone CJ (1980) Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 38:744–751

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethical standards

This work was approved by decision number 13/36 dated 03.02.2013 by the Başkent University Clinical Study Ethical Committee (project; KA 13:61) and therefore carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinski.

Conflict of interest

Ozan L. Abbas, Ayla Kürkçüoğlu, Can Pelin, Ayşe Canan Yazıcı declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Patients consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic, Ahi Evran University, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 40000, Kırşehir, Turkey

    Ozan Luay Abbas

  2. Department of Anatomy, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey

    Ayla Kürkçüoğlu & Can Pelin

  3. Department of Biostatistics, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey

    Ayşe Canan Yazıcı

Authors
  1. Ozan Luay Abbas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ayla Kürkçüoğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Can Pelin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ayşe Canan Yazıcı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozan Luay Abbas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbas, O.L., Kürkçüoğlu, A., Pelin, C. et al. Anthropometric measurement and analysis of the lower face in Turkish rhinoplasty patients. Eur J Plast Surg 38, 449–458 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-015-1135-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-015-1135-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation