Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detailed imaging of the normal anatomy and pathologic conditions of the cavernous region at 3 Tesla using a contrast-enhanced MR angiography

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of a high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) at 3 Tesla for the delineation of the cavernous sinus (CS) anatomy both under normal and under pathological conditions.

Methods

Fifteen patients without pathologies in the CS and ten patients with pituitary adenomas were included. The CE-MRA was performed on a 3-Tesla scanner and analyzed collaboratively by two readers. The cranial nerves (CNs) within the CS, namely CNIII, CNIV, CNV1, CNV2, and CNVI, were identified in both patient groups. In the adenoma patients it was also assessed whether and to which extend the adenoma invaded the CS and the spatial relationship between tumor and CNs was determined.

Results

In the patients with normal CS anatomy, CNIII could be identified in 100%, CNIV in 86.7%, and CNV1, CNV2, as well as CNVI in 100% of analyzed sides. Pituitary adenomas invaded the CS unilaterally (right side) in four patients, and bilaterally in six patients. In patients with adenomas, the CN could be identified and differentiated from the tumor in the following percentages: CNIII in 100%, CNIV in 70%, both CNV1 and CNV2 in 90%, and CNVI in 100%. In all these cases, the tumor–nerve spatial relationship could be visualized.

Conclusions

3-Tesla CE-MRA allows detailed imaging of the complex anatomy of the CS and its structures. In adenoma patients, it clearly visualizes the spatial relationship between tumor and CNs, and thus might be helpful to optimize presurgical planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yasuda A, Campero A, Martins C, Rhoton AL Jr, de Oliveira E, Ribas GC (2008) Microsurgical anatomy and approaches to the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery 62(Suppl 3):1240–1263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Razek AA, Castillo M (2009) Imaging lesions of the cavernous sinus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:444–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Adams ME, Linn J, Yousry I (2008) Pathology of the ocular motor nerves III, IV, and VI. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 18:261–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yagi A, Sato N, Taketomi A, Nakajima T, Morita H, Koyama Y, Aoki J, Endo K (2005) Normal cranial nerves in the cavernous sinuses: contrast-enhanced three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady state MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:946–950

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yagi A, Sato N, Takahashi A, Morita H, Amanuma M, Endo K, Takeuchi K (2010) Added value of contrast-enhanced CISS imaging in relation to conventional MR images for the evaluation of intracavernous cranial nerve lesions. Neuroradiology 52(12):1101–1109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirai T, Kai Y, Morioka M, Yano S, Kitajima M, Fukuoka H, Sasao A, Murakami R, Nakayama Y, Awai K, Toya R, Akter M, Korogi Y, Kuratsu J, Yamashita Y (2008) Differentiation between paraclinoid and cavernous sinus aneurysms with contrast-enhanced 3D constructive interference in steady- state MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:130–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Amemiya S, Aoki S, Ohtomo K (2009) Cranial nerve assessment in cavernous sinus tumors with contrast-enhanced 3D fast-imaging employing steady-state acquisition MR imaging. Neuroradiology 51:467–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Linn J, Peters F, Moriggl B, Naidich TP, Brückmann H, Yousry I (2009) The jugular foramen: imaging strategy and detailed anatomy at 3 T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:34–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yousry I, Camelio S, Wiesmann M, Schmid UD, Moriggl B, Brückmann H, Yousry TA (1999) Detailed MR anatomy of the cisternal segment of the abducens nerve: Dorello's canal, neurovascular relationships and landmarks. J Neurosurg 91:276–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yousry I, Moriggl B, Dieterich M, Naidich TP, Schmid UD, Yousry TA (2002) MR anatomy of the proximal cisternal segment of the trochlear nerve: neurovascular relationships and landmarks. Radiology 223:31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rhoton AL Jr (2002) The cavernous sinus, the cavernous venous plexus, and the carotid collar. Neurosurgery 51(4 Suppl):S375–S410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Casselman JW, Kuhweide R, Deimling M, Ampe W, Dehaene I, Meeus L (1993) Constructive interference in steady state-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 14:47–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yousry I, Camelio S, Schmid UD, Horsfield MA, Wiesmann M, Bruckmann H, Yousry TA (2000) Visualization of cranial nerves I-XII: value of 3D CISS and T2-weighted FSE sequences. Eur Radiol 10:1061–1067

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Linn J, Moriggl B, Schwarz F, Naidich TP, Schmid UD, Wiesmann M, Bruckmann H, Yousry I (2009) Cisternal segments of the glossopharyngeal, vagus, and accessory nerves: detailed magnetic resonance imaging-demonstrated anatomy and neurovascular relationships. J Neurosurg 110:1026–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yousry I, Moriggl B, Schmid UD, Naidich TP, Yousry TA (2005) Trigeminal ganglion and its divisions: detailed anatomic MR imaging with contrast-enhanced 3D constructive interference in the steady state sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1128–1135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wikström J, Ronne-Engström E, Gal G, Enblad P, Tovi M (2008) Three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced MRA of intracranial aneurysms treated with platinum coils. Acta Radiol 49:190–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pinker K, Ba-Ssalamah A, Wolfsberger S, Mlynarik V, Knosp E, Trattnig S (2005) The value of high-field MRI (3 T) in the assessment of sellar lesions. Eur J Radiol 54:327–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tuccar E, Uz A, Tekdemir I, Elhan A, Ersoy M, Deda H (2000) Anatomical study of the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus, emphasizing dural construction and neural relations. Neurosurg Rev 23:45–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Harris FS, Rhoton AL (1976) Anatomy of the cavernous sinus. A microsurgical study. J Neurosurg 45:169–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Scotti G, Yu CY, Dillon WP, Norman D, Colombo N, Newton TH, De Groot J, Wilson CB (1988) MR imaging of cavernous sinus involvement by pituitary adenomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 151:799–806

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vieira JO Jr, Cukiert A, Liberman B (2006) Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging criteria for cavernous sinus invasion in patients with pituitary adenomas: logistic regression analysis and correlation with surgical findings. Surg Neurol 65:130–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Linn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Linn, J., Peters, F., Lummel, N. et al. Detailed imaging of the normal anatomy and pathologic conditions of the cavernous region at 3 Tesla using a contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Neuroradiology 53, 947–954 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-011-0837-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-011-0837-3

Keywords

Navigation