Skip to main content
Log in

Gap Junctional Intercellular Communication as a Biological “Rosetta Stone” in Understanding, in a Systems Biological Manner, Stem Cell Behavior, Mechanisms of Epigenetic Toxicology, Chemoprevention and Chemotherapy

  • Published:
Journal of Membrane Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spite of the early speculation by Loewenstein that one of the critical distinguishing phenotypes of cancers from normal cells was the dysfunction of gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC), this hypothesis has not captured the attention of most birth defects and cancer researchers. Moreover, even with later demonstrations that factors that influence normal development and carcinogenesis by modulating GJIC, such as chemical teratogens and tumor-promoting chemicals, inflammatory factors, hormones and growth factors, antisense connexin genes, knockout mouse models, human inherited mutated connexin genes, si-connexin RNA, chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic chemicals, it is rare that one sees any reference to these studies by the mainstream investigators in these fields. Based on the assumption that the evolutionarily conserved connexin genes found in metazoans are needed for normal development and the maintenance of health and T. Dobzhansky’s statement “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution,” a short review of the roles of endogenous and exogenous modulators of GJIC will be made in the context of the multistage, multimechanism process of carcinogenesis, the stem cell theory of carcinogenesis, the discovery and characterization of normal adult stem “cancer stem” cells and the observation that two distinct classes of GJIC-deficient cancer cells are known. The implications of these observations to a “systems biological” view of the role of gap junctions and the nutritional prevention and treatment of several chronic diseases and cancer will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Hajj, et al. (2003) Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:3983–3988

  • Ames BN, et al. (1973) Carcinogens are mutagens: a simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:2281–2285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asakura A, Rudnicki AR (2002) Side population cells from diverse adult tissues are capable of in vitro hematopoietic differentiation. Exp Hematol 30:1339–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barcellos-Hoff MH (2001) It takes a tissue to make a tumor: epigenetics, cancer and the microenvironment. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 6:213–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boutwell RK, et al. (1982) Mouse skin: a useful model system for studying the mechanism of chemical carcinogenesis. In: Carcinogenesis, vol 7. Raven Press, New York, 1–12

  • Brash DE, et al. (1991) A role for sunlight in skin cancer: UV-induced p53 mutations in squamous cell carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish-Bowden A (2006) Putting the systems back into systems biology. Perspect Biol Med 49:475–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Csete M (2005) Oxygen in the cultivation of stem cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1049:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1975) Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teachers 35:125–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagle H (1965) Growth regulatory effects of cellular interaction. Isr J Med Sci 1:1220–1228

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans WH, Martin PEM (2002) Gap junction: structure and function. Mol Membr Biol 19:121–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farber E (2000) Risk assessment for possible carcinogens: a critical look. Drug Metab Rev 32:143–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fialkow PJ (1979) Clonal origin of human tumors. Annu Rev Med 30:1345–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman JA (2001) Operational reversibility is a key aspect of carcinogenesis. Toxicol Sci 64:147–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:57–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayflict L (1965) The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res 37:614–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho SM, et al. (2006) Developmental exposure to estradiol and bisphenol A increases susceptibility to prostate carcinogenesis and epigenetically regulates phosphodiesterase type 4 variant 4. Cancer Res 66:5624–5632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CY, Chang CC (1999) Stem cell differentiation and reduction as a potential mechanism for chemoprevention of breast cancer. Chin Pharm J 51:15–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King TJ, et al. (2000) Correlation between growth control, neoplastic potential and endogenous connexin43 expression in HeLa cell lines: implications for tumor progression. Carcinogenesis 21:311–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo T, et al. (2004) Persistence of a small subpopulation of cancer stem-like cells in the C6 glioma cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:781–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lo CW (1996) The role of gap junction membrane channels in development. J Bioenerg Biomembr 28:379–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein W R, Kanno Y (1966) Intercellular communication and the control of tissue growth: lack of communication between cancer cells. Nature 209:1248–1249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markert C (1968) Neoplasia: a disease of differentiation. Cancer Res 28:1908–1914

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markert CL (1984) Genetic control of cell interactions in chimeras. Dev Genet 4:267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momiyama M, et al. (2003) Connexin26-mediated gap junctional communication reverses the malignant phenotype of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Cancer Sci 94:501–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa T, et al. (2005) Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid enhances gap junctional intercellular communication via acetylation of histone containing connexin43 gene locus. Cancer Res 65:9771–9778

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce GP (1974) Neoplasms, differentiation and mutations. Am J Pathol 77:103–118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pitot H, Dragon YP (1991) Facts and theories concerning the mechanisms of carcinogenesis. FASEB J 5:2280–2286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponti D, et al. (2005) Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem cell/progenitor cell properties. Cancer Res 65:5506–5511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potter VR (1945) The role of nutrition in cancer prevention. Science 101:105–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potter VR (1978) Phenotypic diversity in experimental hepatomas: the concept of partially blocked ontogeny. Br J Cancer 38:1–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravdin PM, Cronin KA, Howlander N, Chlebowski RT, Berry DA (2006) A sharp decrease in breast cancer incidence in the United States in 2003. Abstract presented at the 29th San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX, December 14-17, 2006

  • Singh SK, et al. (2003) Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res 63:5821–5828

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tai MH, et al. (2005) Oct4 expression in adult stem cells: evidence in support of the stem cell theory of carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 26:495–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thilly WG (2004) Have environmental mutagens caused oncomutations in people? Nat Genet 34:255–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Till JE, McCulloch EA (1961) A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow. Radiat Res 14:213–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trosko JE (2000) Gap junctions and the regulation of cellular functions of stem cells during development and differentiation. Methods 20:245–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trosko JE (2001) Is the concept of “tumor promotion” a useful paradigm? Mol Carcinog 30:131–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trosko JE (2003a) Human stem cells as targets for the aging and diseases of aging processes. Med Hypotheses 60:439–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Trosko JE (2003b) The role of stem cells and gap junctional communication in carcinogenesis. J Biochem Mol Biol 36:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Trosko JE, Chang CC (1989) Nongenotoxic mechanisms in carcinogenesis: role of inhibited intercellular communication. In: Hart R, Hoerger FD (eds) Banbury Report 31: New directions in the qualitative and quantitative aspects of carcinogen risk assessment. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp 139–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Trosko JE, Ruch RJ (1998) Cell-cell communication in carcinogenesis. Front Biosci 3:208–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Trosko JE, Ruch RJ (2002) Gap junctions as therapeutic targets. Curr Drug Targets 3:465–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trosko JE, Tai MH (2006) Adult stem cell theory of the multi-stage, multi-mechanism theory of carcinogenesis: role of inflammation on the promotion of initiated stem cells. In: Dittmar T (ed) Infections and inflammation: impacts on oncogenesis. Karger, Amsterdam, pp 45–65

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trosko JE, Upham BL (2005) The emperor wears no clothes in the field of carcinogen risk assessment: ignored concepts in cancer risk assessment. Mutagenesis 20:81–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trosko JE, et al. (1995) Intercellular communication: a paradigm for the interpretation of the initiation/promotion/progression model of carcinogenesis. In: Arcos JC (ed) Chemical induction of cancer: modulation and combination effects. Birkhauser, Boston, pp 205–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Trosko JE, et al. (1998) Epigenetic toxicant-induced changes in intracellular signaling leading to altered gap junctional intercellular communication. Toxicol Lett 102–103:71–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webster JD, et al. (2005) Oct-4 expression in canine neoplasms: a potential role for embryonic genes in cancer progression. Vet Pathol (in press)

  • Wicha MS, Liu S, Dontu G (2006) Cancer stem cells: an old idea – a paradigm shift. Cancer Res 66:1883–1890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This short personal review was written while the author (CORE B director) was supported by grants from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences: 2P42 ES004911-17. The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIEHS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Trosko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trosko, J.E. Gap Junctional Intercellular Communication as a Biological “Rosetta Stone” in Understanding, in a Systems Biological Manner, Stem Cell Behavior, Mechanisms of Epigenetic Toxicology, Chemoprevention and Chemotherapy. J Membrane Biol 218, 93–100 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-007-9072-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-007-9072-6

Keywords

Navigation