Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the moisture evaporation process during vacuum freeze-drying of koumiss and shubat

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The equation for the calculating of a moisture evaporation rate in the vacuum freeze-drying, wherein as a driving force instead of the generally accepted in the drying theory of ∆t temperature difference, ∆p pressure difference, ∆c concentration difference, a difference of water activity in the product and the relative air humidity (\(a_{\text{w}} - \varphi\)) is suggested. By using the proposed equation, the processes of vacuum freeze-drying of koumiss and shubat were analyzed, and it was found two drying periods: constant and falling. On the first drying period, a moisture evaporation rate of koumiss is j = 2.75 × 10−3 kg/(m2 h) and of shubat is j = 2.37 × 10−3 kg/(m2 h). On the second period, values decrease for koumiss from j = 2.65 × 10−3 kg/(m2 h) to j = 1.60 × 10−3 kg/(m2 h), and for shubat from j = 2.25 × 10−3 kg/(m2 h) to j = 1.62 × 10−3 kg/(m2 h). Specific humidity for koumiss is ueq = 0.61 kg/kg and for shubat is ueq = 0.58 kg/kg. The comparative analyze of the experimental data of the moisture evaporation rate versus the theoretical calculation shows that the approximation reliability is R2 = 0.99. Consequently, the proposed equation is useful for the analyzing a moisture evaporation rate during a vacuum freeze-drying of dairy products, including cultured milk foods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

j :

Moisture evaporation rate from the product surface (kg/m2 h)

µ :

Evaporation resistance coefficient

\(a_{\text{w}}\) :

Water activity (%)

φ :

Relative air humidity (%)

u p :

Product specific humidity (%)

\(L_{j,k} = \chi_{j,k}\) :

Kinetic coefficient

\(L_{j,k} = D_{j,k}\) :

Kinetic coefficient

C:

Concentration gradient

∇ t :

Temperature gradient

σp :

Moisture evaporation rate from the product, kg/(m2 s)

\({\text{d}}_{\text{p}}^{\prime \prime }\), \({\text{d}}_{a}^{\prime \prime }\) :

Moisture content of saturated air at the product surface

C p :

Isobaric specific heat of air [J/(kg K)]

\(\alpha\) :

Coefficient of heat transfer from the product surface [W/(m2 K)]

B :

Barometric pressure (Pa)

Wi :

Initial moisture for koumiss (Wi = 91.0), and for shubat (Wi = 88.0) (%)

Wp :

Product humidity at the measuring time (%)

Wcr :

Moisture at the critical point (%)

A:

Constant coefficient, A = 0.622·α·B−1, W/(m2 K Pa)

i:

Initial value

T:

Temperature (C)

P″a:

Partial pressure of water vapor in the air (Pa)

References

  1. Barbosa-CÃ GV, AJ Fontana Jr, Schmidt SJ, Labuza TP (2008) Water activity in foods: fundamentals and applications, vol 13. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan JG (2006) Evaporation and dehydration. Food processing handbook. Wiley, Weinheim, pp 71–124

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Chomanov UCh, Shingisov AU (2006) Raschet profolgitelnosti processa sublimasionnoi sushki pishevyh productov. Vestnik MAH (rus) 1:43–44

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faghri A, Zhang Y, Howell JR (2010) Advanced heat and mass transfer. Global Digital Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Faye B, Konuspayeva G (2012) The sustainability challenge to the dairy sector—the growing importance of non-cattle milk production worldwide. Int Dairy J 24(2):50–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Franks F (1982) Water and aqueous solutions at subzero temperatures, vol 7. Plenum Press, New York, pp 215–338

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Amezquita LE, Welti-Chanes J, Vergara-Balderas FT, Bermúdez-Aguirre D (2016) Freeze-drying: the basic process. reference module in food science from encyclopedia of food and health. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 104–109

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ginzburg AS, Savina IM (1982) Mass transfer characteristics of food products. Light and Food industry, Moscow, Russia, p 280 (rus)

  9. Harper JC, Tappel AL (1957) Freeze-drying of food products. Adv Food Res 7:171–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keey RB (1978) Introduction to industrial drying operations. Pergamon, Oxford, 396 p

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kirillin VA, Sheindlin AE, Shpil’rain EE (1980) Termodinamika rastvorov (Thermodynamics of Solutions). Energiya, Moscow, pp 225–288 (rus)  

  12. Knipschildt ME (1986) Drying of milk and milk products. Modern Dairy Technol 1:131–234

    Google Scholar 

  13. Konuspayeva G, Faye B, Loiseau G (2009) The composition of camel milk: a meta-analysis of the literature data. J Food Compos Anal 22(2):95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kochs M, Körber Ch, Heschel I, Nunner B (1993) The influence of the freezing process on vapour transport during sublimation in vacuum-freeze-drying of macroscopic samples. Int J Heat Mass Transf 36(7):1727–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kudra T, Arun S (2002) Advanced drying technologies. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 467

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malacarne M, Martuzzi F, Summer A, Mariani P (2002) Protein and fat composition of mare’s milk: some nutritional remarks with reference to human and cow’s milk. Int Dairy J 12(11):869–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehta BM (2015) Chemical composition of milk and milk products. Handb Food Chem 511–553

  18. Narayana KB, KrishnaMurthy MV (1979) Determination of thermal properties of food materials theory and experiments. Wärme-und Stoffübertragung 12(3–4):261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Perry RH, Green DW (1997) Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rahman IEA, Dirar HA, Osman MA (2009) Microbiological and biochemical changes and sensory evaluation of camel milk fermented by selected bacterial starter cultures. Afr J Food Sci 3(12):398–405

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ratti C, Bhandari B, Bansal N, Zhang M, Schuck P (2013) Freeze drying for food powder production. In: Handbook of Food Powders. Woohead Publishing Limited, p 641

  22. Rotgolts EA, Shingisov AU (1988) Mathematical modeling of heat and mass transfer during the freezing of meat. Kholodilnaya tekhnika, Moscow Russia Printing house 4:25–28 (rus)

  23. Satayev M, Shakirov B, Mutaliyeva B, Satayeva L, Altynbekov R, Baiysbay O, Alibekov R (2012) Mathematical modeling of methoxyanabasine C11H16N2O polymer solution ultrafiltration. Heat Mass Transf 48(6):979–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schothorst MV (1997) Microorganisms in foods 6: microbial ecology of food commodities. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, p 615

  25. Shori AB (2012) Comparative study of chemical composition, isolation and identification of micro-flora in traditional fermented camel milk products: gariss, Suusac, and Shubat. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 11(2):79–88

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shingisov A, Alibekov R, Erkebaeva S, Nurseitova Z, Orymbetova G, Kantureeva G, Mailybaeva E (2015) Desorption isotherms of the koumiss and shubat clots enriched by various additives. Modern Appl Sci 9(8):409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sulaimanova GI, Saitmuratova OKh, Sadykov AA (2001) Amino-acid composition of camel’s milk and shubat. Chem Nat Compd 37(4):369–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tamime AY (2008) Structure of dairy Products. society of dairy technology, series. Wiley, Hoboken, p 304

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravshanbek Sultanbekovich Alibekov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shingisov, A.U., Alibekov, R.S. Analysis of the moisture evaporation process during vacuum freeze-drying of koumiss and shubat. Heat Mass Transfer 53, 1571–1578 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-016-1920-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-016-1920-4

Keywords

Navigation