Skip to main content
Log in

Potential drug-drug interactions and adverse drug reactions in patients with liver cirrhosis

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Patients with liver cirrhosis may be at risk for potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) and/or adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to the severity of their disease and comorbidities associated with polypharmacy.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional retrospective study including 400 cirrhotic patients and assessed diagnoses, medication patterns, pDDIs, and ADRs at hospital admission.

Results

The median (range) age of the patients was 60 (21–88) years; 68.5% were male. They had a total of 2,415 diagnoses, resulting in 6 (1–10) diagnoses per patient. Frequent were diagnoses of the digestive system (28.4%), circulatory system (14.2%), blood and blood-forming organs (8.7%), and psychiatric disorders (7.5%); 60.7% of the diagnoses were not liver-associated. The median number of drugs per patient was 5 (0–18), whereof 3 (0–16) were predominantly hepatically eliminated. Drugs were primarily indicated for gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, or nervous system disorders, reflecting the prevalent diagnoses. In 112 (28%) patients, 200 ADRs were detected, mainly associated with spironolactone, torasemide, furosemide, and ibuprofen. In 86 (21.5%) patients, 132 pDDIs were detected. Seven of these pDDIs were the direct cause of 15 ADRs, whereof 3 resulted in hospital admission. Patients with ADRs were older, had more comorbidities, were treated with more drugs, and had a worse renal function and more pDDIs than patients without ADRs.

Conclusions

Pharmacotherapy is complex in cirrhotic patients. Hepatologists should know the principles of dose adjustment in cirrhosis and renal failure, but also the most important pDDIs of the drugs used to treat liver disease and comorbidities in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

pDDIs:

Potential drug-drug interactions

ADRs:

Adverse drug reactions

NSAIDs:

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Q0 :

Extrarenal elimination fraction

ATC code:

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System

ACE:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme

HSCT:

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

RAAS:

Renin angiotensin aldosterone system

SSRI:

Selective serotonine reuptake inhibitor

COX:

Cyclooxygenase

References

  1. Leon DA, McCambridge J (2006) Liver cirrhosis mortality rates in Britain from 1950 to 2002: an analysis of routine data. Lancet 367:52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Delco F, Tchambaz L, Schlienger R, Drewe J, Krahenbuhl S (2005) Dose adjustment in patients with liver disease. Drug Saf 28:529–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zuckerman MJ, Menzies IS, Ho H, Gregory GG, Casner NA, Crane RS et al (2004) Assessment of intestinal permeability and absorption in cirrhotic patients with ascites using combined sugar probes. Dig Dis Sci 49:621–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blaschke TF, Rubin PC (1979) Hepatic first-pass metabolism in liver disease. Clin Pharmacokinet 4:423–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vyas K, Gala B, Sawant P, Das HS, Kulhalli PM, Mahajan SS (2002) Assessment of portal hemodynamics by ultrasound color Doppler and laser Doppler velocimetry in liver cirrhosis. Indian J Gastroenterol 21:176–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adedoyin A, Arns PA, Richards WO, Wilkinson GR, Branch RA (1998) Selective effect of liver disease on the activities of specific metabolizing enzymes: investigation of cytochromes P450 2C19 and 2D6. Clin Pharmacol Ther 64:8–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. George J, Murray M, Byth K, Farrell GC (1995) Differential alterations of cytochrome P450 proteins in livers from patients with severe chronic liver disease. Hepatology 21:120–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tegeder I, Lotsch J, Geisslinger G (1999) Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease. Clin Pharmacokinet 37:17–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. MacGilchrist AJ, Birnie GG, Cook A, Scobie G, Murray T, Watkinson G et al (1986) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous midazolam in patients with severe alcoholic cirrhosis. Gut 27:190–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gines P, Arrovo V, Rodes J (1992) Pharmacotherapy of ascites associated with cirrhosis. Drugs 43:316–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krahenbuhl-Melcher A, Schlienger R, Lampert M, Haschke M, Drewe J, Krahenbuhl S (2007) Drug-related problems in hospitals: a review of the recent literature. Drug Saf 30:379–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Child CG, Turcotte JG (1964) Surgery and portal hypertension. In: Child C (ed) The liver and portal hypertension. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 50–64

    Google Scholar 

  14. Egger SS, Meier S, Leu C, Christen S, Gratwohl A, Krahenbuhl S et al (2010) Drug interactions and adverse events associated with antimycotic drugs used for invasive aspergillosis in hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 45:1197–1203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lucena MI, Andrade RJ, Tognoni G, Hidalgo R, De La Cuesta FS (2002) Multicenter hospital study on prescribing patterns for prophylaxis and treatment of complications of cirrhosis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 58:435–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lucena MI, Andrade RJ, Tognoni G, Hidalgo R, Sanchez de la Cuesta F (2003) Drug use for non-hepatic associated conditions in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 59:71–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN (1998) Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 279:1200–1205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Hooft CS, Dieleman JP, Siemes C, Aarnoudse AJ, Verhamme KM, Stricker BH et al (2008) Adverse drug reaction-related hospitalisations: a population-based cohort study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 17:365–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ et al (2004) Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ 329:15–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fattinger K, Roos M, Vergeres P, Holenstein C, Kind B, Masche U et al (2000) Epidemiology of drug exposure and adverse drug reactions in two Swiss departments of internal medicine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 49:158–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, Burke JP (1991) Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients. JAMA 266:2847–2851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Herr RD, Caravati EM, Tyler LS, Iorg E, Linscott MS (1992) Prospective evaluation of adverse drug interactions in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 21:1331–1336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ratz Bravo AE, Tchambaz L, Krahenbuhl-Melcher A, Hess L, Schlienger RG, Krahenbuhl S (2005) Prevalence of potentially severe drug-drug interactions in ambulatory patients with dyslipidaemia receiving HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy. Drug Saf 28:263–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Corsonello A, Pedone C, Corica F, Mussi C, Carbonin P, Antonelli Incalzi R et al (2005) Concealed renal insufficiency and adverse drug reactions in elderly hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med 165:790–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Papadakis MA, Arieff AI (1987) Unpredictability of clinical evaluation of renal function in cirrhosis. Prospective study. Am J Med 82:945–952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Angeli P, Gatta A, Caregaro L, Menon F, Sacerdoti D, Merkel C et al (1990) Tubular site of renal sodium retention in ascitic liver cirrhosis evaluated by lithium clearance. Eur J Clin Invest 20:111–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Amir O, Hassan Y, Sarriff A, Awaisu A, Abd Aziz N, Ismail O (2009) Incidence of risk factors for developing hyperkalemia when using ACE inhibitors in cardiovascular diseases. Pharm World Sci 31:387–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sacerdoti D, Bolognesi M, Merkel C, Angeli P, Gatta A (1993) Renal vasoconstriction in cirrhosis evaluated by duplex Doppler ultrasonography. Hepatology 17:219–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wensing G, Lotterer E, Link I, Hahn EG, Fleig WE (1997) Urinary sodium balance in patients with cirrhosis: relationship to quantitative parameters of liver function. Hepatology 26:1149–1155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. De Ledinghen V, Heresbach D, Fourdan O, Bernard P, Liebaert-Bories MP, Nousbaum JB et al (1999) Anti-inflammatory drugs and variceal bleeding: a case-control study. Gut 44:270–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors indicates a conflict of interest with this work.

Financial support

S.K. is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A_132992/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Krähenbühl.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 48.5 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franz, C.C., Egger, S., Born, C. et al. Potential drug-drug interactions and adverse drug reactions in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 68, 179–188 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-011-1105-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-011-1105-5

Keywords

Navigation