Skip to main content
Log in

Determining effective acoustic array design for monitoring presence of white sharks Carcharodon carcharias in nearshore habitats

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inferences regarding animal presence from passive acoustic receiver arrays are driven by the spatial configuration of receivers. Large, dense arrays provide more information, but maintenance of multiple receivers is costly. Configuring acoustic receiver arrays to maximise coverage while minimising cost is therefore paramount. This study used data from a dense acoustic receiver array within a white shark Carcharodon carcharias nursery area on the east coast of Australia to assess how detection data of tagged white sharks in the area was affected by reducing the array size. Receivers were sub-sampled post hoc by simple random sampling, clustered random sampling, and sampling of the top performing receivers. Using the top performing receivers, array size could be reduced by 60% (10 out of 25 receivers) while still detecting a median of 100% of white sharks detected with the full array. With random and clustered sampling methods, a 40% reduction in array size (15 out of 25 receivers) detected a median of 100% of sharks. Reducing the array size by 60% using the top performing receivers resulted in a 35% decrease in the median number of detections per visit of the tagged sharks (67 out of 102.5 detections). In comparison, reducing the array by the same amount with random and clustered sampling methods resulted in a 57% decrease (44 out of 102.5 detections). The post hoc sampling methods used in this study are an empirical approach for optimising placement of limited receiver resources with broad application for establishing cost-effective monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data analysed during the current study are available from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation of Australia (CSIRO), but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for the current study, and so, the data are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of CSIRO.

Code availability

All coding was conducted in R, and relevant packages are noted in the methods section. The custom code used for sampling of the receivers is available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  • Andrews KS, Williams GD, Levin PS (2010) Seasonal and ontogenetic changes in movement patterns of sixgill sharks. PLoS ONE 5:e12549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford RW, Hobday AJ, Bruce BD (2012) Identifying juvenile white shark behavior from electronic tag data. In: Domeier ML (ed) Global perspectives on the biology and life history of the white shark. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 255–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownscombe JW, Lédée EJI, Raby GD, Struthers DP, Gutowsky LFG, Nguyen VM, Young N, Stokesbury MJW, Holbrook CM, Brenden TO, Vandergoot CS, Murchie KJ, Whoriskey K, Mills Flemming J, Kessel ST, Krueger CC, Cooke SJ (2019) Conducting and interpreting fish telemetry studies: considerations for researchers and resource managers. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 29:369–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-019-09560-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce BD, Bradford R (2008) Spatial dynamics and habitat preferences of juvenile white sharks—identifying critical habitat and options for monitoring recruitment. Final report to the department of the environment, water, heritage and the arts. CSIRO, Hobart, Tasmania, AUS

  • Bruce BD, Bradford RW (2011a) The effects of berleying on the distribution and behaviour of white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias, at the Neptune Islands, South Australia. Final report to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, South Australia. CSIRO, Hobart, Tasmania, AUS

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce BD, Bradford RW (2011b) Near-shore habitat use by juvenile white sharks in coastal waters off Port Stephens. Final Report, CSIRO, Hobart, Tasmania, AUS

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce BD, Bradford RW (2012) Habitat use and spatial dynamics of juvenile white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias, in eastern Australia. In: Domeier ML (ed) Global perspectives on the biology and life history of the white shark. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 225–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce BD, Bradford RW, Hughes B, Carraro R, Gallen C, Harasti D, Gladstone W (2013) Acoustic tracking and aerial surveys of juvenile white sharks in the Hunter Catchment Management Authority region. Final Report, CSIRO, Hobart, Tasmania, AUS

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle AB, Tickler D, Dale JJ, Ferretti F, Curnick DJ, Chapple TK, Schallert RJ, Castleton M, Block BA (2019) Estimating space use of mobile fishes in a large marine protected area with methodological considerations in acoustic array design. Front Mar Sci 6:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00256/full

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin A, Heupel M, Simpfendorfer C, Tobin A (2016) Population organisation in reef sharks: new variations in coastal habitat use by mobile marine predators. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 544:197–211. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colefax AP, Kelaher BP, Pagendam DE, Butcher PA (2020) Assessing white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) behavior along coastal beaches for conservation-focused shark mitigation. Front Mar Sci 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00268/full

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley P, Bennett R, Childs AR, Murray T (2017) Reflection on the first five years of South Africa’s Acoustic Tracking Array Platform (ATAP): status, challenges and opportunities. Afr J Mar Sci 39:363–372. https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232x.2017.1399927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza M, Farrugia TJ, Lowe CG (2011a) Habitat use, movements and site fidelity of the gray smooth-hound shark (Mustelus californicus Gill 1863) in a newly restored southern California estuary. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 401:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza M, Farrugia TJ, Webber DM, Smith F, Lowe CG (2011b) Testing a new acoustic telemetry technique to quantify long-term, fine-scale movements of aquatic animals. Fish Res 108:364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harasti D, Lee K, Bruce B, Gallen C, Bradford R (2017) Juvenile white sharks Carcharodon carcharias use estuarine environments in south-eastern Australia. Mar Biol 164:58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3087-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA, Hueter RE (2004) Estimation of shark home ranges using passive monitoring techniques. Environ Biol Fishes 71:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ebfi.0000045710.18997.f7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heupel MR, Semmens JM, Hobday AJ (2006a) Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays. Mar Freshw Res 57:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf05091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heupel MR, Simpfendorfer CA, Collins AB, Tyminski JP (2006b) Residency and movement patterns of bonnethead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo, in a large Florida estuary. Environ Biol Fishes 76:47–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9007-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heupel MR, Reiss KL, Yeiser BG, Simpfendorfer CA (2008) Effects of biofouling on performance of moored data logging acoustic receivers. Limnol Oceanogr 6:327–335. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2008.6.327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heupel MR, Yeiser BG, Collins AB, Ortega L, Simpfendorfer CA (2010) Long-term presence and movement patterns of juvenile bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas, in an estuarine river system. Mar Freshw Res 61:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF09019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R, Mangel M (1997) Probability and probability models: know your data The ecological detective: Confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp 39–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday AJ, Pincock D (2011) Estimating detection probabilities for linear acoustic monitoring arrays American Fisheries Society Symposium, pp 1–22

  • Hussey NE, Kessel ST, Aarestrup K, Cooke SJ, Cowley PD, Fisk AT, Harcourt RG, Holland KN, Iverson SJ, Kocik JF, Mills Flemming JE, Whoriskey FG (2015) Aquatic animal telemetry: a panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348:1255642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huveneers C, Simpfendorfer CA, Kim S, Semmens JM, Hobday AJ, Pederson H, Stieglitz T, Vallee R, Webber D, Heupel MR, Peddemors V, Harcourt RG (2016) The influence of environmental parameters on the performance and detection range of acoustic receivers. Methods Ecol Evol 7:825–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R, Bester MN, Dudley SFJ, Oosthuizen WH, Meÿer M, Hancke L, Gennari E (2009) Coastal swimming patterns of white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) at Mossel Bay, South Africa. Environ Biol Fishes 85:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-009-9477-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahle D, Wickham H (2013) ggmap: spatial visualization with ggplot2. The R Journal 5:144–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimley AP, Le Boeuf BJ, Cantara KM, Richert JE, Davis SF, Van Sommeran S (2001) Radio-acoustic positioning as a tool for studying site-specific behavior of the white shark and other large marine species. Mar Biol 138:429–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270000394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock A, O’Riain MJ, Mauff K, Meyer M, Kotze D, Griffiths C (2013) Residency, habitat use and sexual segregation of white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias in False Bay. South Africa PLoS One 8:e55048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe CG, Wetherbee BM, Meyer CG (2006) Using acoustic telemetry monitoring techniques to quantify movement patterns and site fidelity of sharks and giant trevally around French Frigate Shoals and Midway Atoll. Atoll Res Bull 543:281–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson TA, Pillans RD (2019) Designing acoustic arrays for estimation of mortality rates in riverine and estuarine systems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 76:1471–1479. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2018-0090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillans RD, Bearham D, Boomer A, Downie RA, Patterson TA, Thomson DP, Babcock RC (2014) Multi year observations reveal variability in residence of a tropical Demersal Fish, Lethrinus nebulosus: implications for spatial management. PLoS ONE 9:e105507. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby CL, Barreto R, Carlson J, Fernando D, Fordham S, Francis MP, Herman K, Jabado RW, Liu KM, Lowe CG, Marshall A, Pacoureau N, Romanov E, Sherley RB, Winker H (2019) Carcharodon carcharias. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019 e.T3855A2878674. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T3855A2878674.en

  • Simmons P, Mehmet MI (2018) Shark management strategy policy considerations: community preferences, reasoning and speculations. Marine Policy 96:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpfendorfer CA, Heupel M (2004) Assessing habitat use and movement. In: Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds) Biology of sharks and their relatives. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 553–572

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simpfendorfer CA, Heupel MR, Collins AB (2008) Variation in the performance of acoustic receivers and its implication for positioning algorithms in a riverine setting. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:482–492. https://doi.org/10.1139/f07-180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpfendorfer CA, Heupel MR, Hueter RE (2002) Estimation of short-term centers of activity from an array of omnidirectional hydrophones and its use in studying animal movements. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1139/f01-191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpfendorfer CA, Huveneers C, Steckenreuter A, Tattersall K, Hoenner X, Harcourt R, Heupel MR (2015) Ghosts in the data: false detections in VEMCO pulse position modulation acoustic telemetry monitoring equipment. Animal Biotelemetry 3:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-015-0094-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims DW (2010) Tracking and analysis techniques for understanding free-ranging shark movements and behavior Sharks and their relatives II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 367–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaet JLY, Manica A, Brand CP, Gallen C, Butcher PA (2020a) Environmental conditions are poor predictors of immature white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) occurrences on coastal beaches of eastern Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 653:167–179. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaet JLY, Patterson TA, Bradford RW, Butcher PA (2020b) Spatiotemporal distribution patterns of immature Australasian white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias). Sci Rep 10:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66876-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steckenreuter A, Hoenner X, Huveneers C, Simpfendorfer C, Buscot MJ, Tattersall K, Babcock R, Heupel M, Meekan M, van den Broek J, McDowall P, Peddemors V, Harcourt R (2017) Optimising the design of large-scale acoustic telemetry curtains. Mar Freshw Res 68:1403–1413. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf16126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel AE, Coates JH, Hearn AR, Klimley AP (2014) Performance of an ultrasonic telemetry positioning system under varied environmental conditions. Anim Biotelemet 2:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-3385-2-15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundström LF, Gruber SH, Clermont SM, Correia JP, De Marignac JR, Morrissey JF, Lowrance CR, Thomassen L, Oliveira MT (2001) Review of elasmobranch behavioral studies using ultrasonic telemetry with special reference to the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris, around Bimini Islands, Bahamas. Environ Biol Fishes 60:225–250. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007657505099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate RD, Cullis BR, Smith SDA, Kelaher BP, Brand CP, Gallen CR, Mandelman JW, Butcher PA (2019) The acute physiological status of white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) exhibits minimal variation after capture on SMART drumlines. Conserv Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coz042

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Udyawer V, Dwyer RG, Hoenner X, Babcock RC, Brodie S, Campbell HA, Harcourt RG, Huveneers C, Jaine FRA, Simpfendorfer CA, Taylor MD, Heupel MR (2018) A standardised framework for analysing animal detections from automated tracking arrays. Animal Biotelemetry 6:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-018-0162-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voegeli FA, Smale MJ, Webber DM, Andrade Y, O’Dor RK (2001) Ultrasonic telemetry, tracking and automated monitoring technology for sharks. Environ Biol Fishes 60:267–282. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007682304720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh JQ, Fox RJ, Webber DM, Bellwood DR (2012) Performance of remote acoustic receivers within a coral reef habitat: implications for array design. Coral Reefs 31:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-012-0892-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was undertaken for the Marine Biodiversity Hub, a collaborative partnership supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP). NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub partners include the University of Tasmania, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Geoscience Australia, the Australian Institute of Marine Science, Museums Victoria, Charles Darwin University, the University of Western Australia, the Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS), NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Department of the Environment and Energy. Barry Bruce (CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, retired) is thanked for his foresight in setting up this project, his perseverance, and his indomitable spirit. We also acknowledge the assistance provided by the NSW Department of Primary Industries staff, in particular, Christopher Gallen, Roger Laird, Peter Gibson, and Brett Louden. Kent Stannard (Tag for Life) has also been a constant supporter and invaluable member of the field work crew.

Funding

This work was jointly funded by the CSIRO and the Australian Government's National Environmental Science Programme NESP through the Marine Biodiversity Hub (Project A3: https://www.nespmarine.edu.au/project/project-a3-national-assessment-status-white-sharks). Sofia Gabriel was funded through the CSIRO‐UTAS Quantitative Marine Sciences PhD Program, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Data collection was conducted by Russ Bradford, David Harasti, and Paul Butcher; Sofia Gabriel, Toby Patterson, Paige Eveson, and Russ Bradford conceived the study idea, conducted the data analyses, and wrote the manuscript, with assistance and commentary from Julia Spaet and Jayson Semmens.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofia M. Gabriel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

ACEC 14/07; Scientific Collection permit P07/0099; Scientific Research Permit P01/0059(A); Marine Parks Research Permit P16/0145- 1.1 and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment (DPIPWE): AEC Permit 22/2015–16, and its predecessors; DPIPWE Living Marine Resources Management Act 1995 Permit 15,008 (and previous derivations), DPIPWE Threatened Fauna for Scientific Purposes permit 14,239; Victorian Department of Environment and Primary Industries (VDPI) Research permit 10,006,912, VDPI Protected Aquatic Biota permit PA38. All tagging was carried out in accordance with the CSIRO Code of Practice for tagging marine animals, with protocols used approved by the Tasmanian DPIPWE Animal Ethics and NSW DPI Animal Care and Ethics Research Authority.

Consent to participate/consent for publication

All the individuals listed as authors on this manuscript have agreed to be listed and approve the submitted version of the manuscript.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: J. Carlson.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reviewers: A.Dawdy and T. R. Nelson.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic supplementary material 1 (PDF 2712 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gabriel, S.M., Patterson, T.A., Eveson, J.P. et al. Determining effective acoustic array design for monitoring presence of white sharks Carcharodon carcharias in nearshore habitats. Mar Biol 168, 49 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03850-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03850-x

Navigation