Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Three Bone Densitometry Methods in Osteoporotic Women

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Three techniques of bone mass measurement were evaluated in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis; the overlap in the measurements and the capacity for discriminating was determined among 51 postmenopausal normal (mean age 66.6 ± 8.4 years) and 42 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (mean age 68.5 ± 7.5 years). All bone mass was evaluated by total body bone mineral content (BMCTB), density (BMDTB), ultrasound bone velocity (UBV) in proximal phalanxes 2–5 of the nondominant hand (UBV = mean value of all ultrasound measurements), and peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the nondominant forearm (pQCT). BMCTB was found to be significantly better (P < 0.0001) for diagnosing postmenopausal osteoporosis than the other methods; both cortical and trabecular pQCT measurements were more discriminating than the corresponding UBV measurements (P < 0.001). T-score values in normals, subjects versus osteoporotic ones were BMCTB−1.15 ± 0.79 versus −3.17 ± 0.74; BMDTB−1.01 ± 0.97 versus −3.28 ± 0.81; UBV −1.51 ± 1.02 versus −2.34 ± 1.21; trabecular-pQCT −0.40 ± 0.72 versus −1.57 ± 0.37; cortical-pQCT −1.00 ± 0.87 versus −2.67 ± 0.53; and total-pQCT −0.65 ± 1.01 versus −2.34 ± 0.27, respectively. The overlap in values between the postmenopausal normal and postmenopausal osteoporotic groups was 50% with UBV, 6% with BMCTB, 9% with BMDTB, 25% with cortical pQCT, and 42% with trabecular pQCT. BMCTB, BMDTB, UBV, and pQCT correlated well with each other as measurements of bone mass, but BMCTB was more discriminating than the other measurements in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 7 June 1995 / Accepted: 21 May 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cardenas, J., Revilla, M., Hernández, E. et al. Comparison of Three Bone Densitometry Methods in Osteoporotic Women. Calcif Tissue Int 61, 358–361 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002239900348

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002239900348

Navigation