Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Analysis of Femoral Macro- and Micromorphology in Males and Females With and Without Hyperostosis Frontalis Interna: A Cross-Sectional Cadaveric Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We hypothesized that subjects with hyperostosis frontalis interna (HFI), which represents local, endocranial thickening of the frontal bone, would express extra-calvarial manifestations of this condition. Therefore, we compared femoral bone mineral density, geometry, and microarchitecture of males and females with HFI to those without this condition as well as between males and females with HFI. The sample was taken from human donor cadavers, 38 males (19 with and 19 without HFI) and 34 females (17 with and 17 without HFI) that were age-matched within the same sex. The specimens of femoral bones were scanned using microcomputed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Parameters of hip structure analysis (HSA) were calculated from data derived from DXA scans. Females with HFI had increased cortical bone volume fraction and their cortical bone was less porous compared to females without HFI. Males with HFI showed microarchitectural differences only with the trabecular bone. They had increased bone volume fraction and decreased trabecular separation compared to males without HFI, although with borderline significance. These microarchitectural changes did not have significant impact on femoral geometry and bone mineral density. The same, still unknown etiological factor behind HFI might be inducing changes at the level of bone microarchitecture at a remote skeletal site (femoral bone), in both sexes. These alterations still do not have the magnitude to induce obvious, straightforward overall increase of bone mineral density measured by DXA. HFI could be a systemic phenomenon that affects both males and females in a similar manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Western AG, Bekvalac JJ (2017) Hyperostosis frontalis interna in female historic skeletal populations: age, sex hormones and the impact of industrialization. Am J Phys Anthropol 162:501–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hershkovitz I, Greenwald C, Rothschild BM et al (1999) Hyperostosis frontalis interna: an anthropological perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol 109:303–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199907)109:3<303:AID-AJPA3>3.0.CO;2-I

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nikolić S, Djonić D, Živković V et al (2010) Rate of occurrence, gross appearance, and age relation of hyperostosis frontalis interna in females: a prospective autopsy study. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 31:205–207. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0b013e3181d3dba4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. May H, Peled N, Dar G et al (2010) Hyperostosis frontalis interna and androgen suppression. Anat Rec 293:1333–1336. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.21175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Salmi A, Voutilainen A, Holsti IR, Unnerus CE (1962) Hyperostosis cranii in a normal population. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 87:1032–1040

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dann S (1951) Metabolic craniopathy: a review of the literature with report of a case with diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 34:163–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moore (1944) Metabolic craniopathy. Am J Roentgenol 35:30–39

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fulton JD, Shand J, Ritchie D, McGhee J (1990) Hyperostosis frontalis interna, acromegaly and hyperprolactinaemia. Postgrad Med J 66:16–19. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.66.771.16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. May H, Mali Y, Dar G et al (2012) Intracranial volume, cranial thickness, and hyperostosis frontalis interna in the elderly. Am J Hum Biol 24:812–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Almeida M, Laurent MR, Dubois V et al (2017) Estrogens and androgens in skeletal physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev 97:135–187. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00033.2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khosla S, Monroe DG (2018) Regulation of bone metabolism by sex steroids. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a031211

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kollin E, Feher T (1986) Androgens, bone mineral content and hyperostosis frontalis interna in pre-menopausal women. Exp Clin Endocrinol 87:211–214. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1210546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Djonic D, Bracanovic D, Rakocevic Z et al (2016) Hyperostosis frontalis interna in postmenopausal women—possible relation to osteoporosis. Women Heal 56:994–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2016.1178685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cui WQ, Won YY, Baek MH et al (2008) Age-and region-dependent changes in three-dimensional microstructural properties of proximal femoral trabeculae. Osteoporos Int 19:1579–1587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0601-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Warden KE et al (1990) Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach. Invest Radiol 25:6–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199001000-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV (2012) The distribution of FRAX((R))-based probabilities in women from Japan. J Bone Miner Metab 30:700–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-012-0371-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cvetkovic D, Nikolic S, Brkovic V, Zivkovic V (2019) Hyperostosis frontalis interna as an age-related phenomenon - Differences between males and females and possible use in identification. Sci Justice 59:172–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2018.09.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sebastian A, Loots GG (2018) Genetics of Sost/SOST in sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease animal models. Metabolism 80:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2017.10.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Delgado-Calle J, Sato AY, Bellido T (2017) Role and mechanism of action of sclerostin in bone. Bone 96:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2016.10.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharifi M, Ereifej L, Lewiecki EM (2015) Sclerostin and skeletal health. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 16:149–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-015-9311-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Parr BA, McMahon AP (1995) Dorsalizing signal Wnt-7a required for normal polarity of D-V and A-P axes of mouse limb. Nature 374:350–353. https://doi.org/10.1038/374350a0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Niemann S, Zhao C, Pascu F et al (2004) Homozygous WNT3 mutation causes tetra-amelia in a large consanguineous family. Am J Hum Genet 74:558–563. https://doi.org/10.1086/382196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bian P, Li X, Ying Q et al (2015) Factors associated with low femoral neck bone mineral density in very elderly Chinese males. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 61:484–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2015.08.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cauley JA, Ewing SK, Taylor BC et al (2010) Sex steroid hormones in older men: longitudinal associations with 4.5-year change in hip bone mineral density–the osteoporotic fractures in men study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:4314–4323. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-2635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lou Bonnick S (2007) HSA: beyond BMD with DXA. Bone 41:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2007.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Beck TJ (2007) Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: understanding hip structure analysis. Curr Osteoporos Rep 5:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-007-0002-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Beck TJ, Looker AC, Ruff CB et al (2000) Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data. J Bone Miner Res 15:2297–2304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Saukko P, Knight B (2004) Knight’s Forensic pathology. Arnold, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Madea B (2014) Handbook of forensic medicine. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Dr. Ivan Zaletel for graphical representation of data.

Funding

This work was supported by Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [Grant Number 45005].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DC involved in collecting resources, investigation, formal analysis, and writing—original draft; JJ performed investigation and formal analysis; PM did methodology and visualization; DD contributed to mmethodology and writing—review & editing; MD performeed project administration, conceptualization, and methodology; MI did investigation and formal analysis; and SN and VZ involved in collecting resources, supervision, conceptualization, methodology, and writing—rreview & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Živković.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine, University of Belgrade (Approval No. 2650/XII-14).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cvetković, D., Jadžić, J., Milovanović, P. et al. Comparative Analysis of Femoral Macro- and Micromorphology in Males and Females With and Without Hyperostosis Frontalis Interna: A Cross-Sectional Cadaveric Study. Calcif Tissue Int 107, 464–473 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-020-00740-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-020-00740-0

Keywords

Navigation