Abstract.
The purpose of the present study was to characterize the effect of a local GABAergic inhibitory mechanism on the mechanical receptive field properties of trigeminal spinal nucleus caudalis (SpVc) neurons by iontophoretic application of a γ-aminobutyric acidA (GABAA)-antagonist and -agonist. A total of 24 SpVc neurons that responded to orofacial mechanical stimulation were extracellularly recorded by means of multibarrel microelectrodes in urethane-anesthetized rats. The GABAA antagonist bicuculline (30 nA, 5 min) enhanced the activities of SpVc neurons (20/24) induced by both touch/pressure and pinch stimuli and also lowered the mechanical stimulation threshold (touch/pressure). Spontaneous discharges in these neurons (20/24) were significantly increased after bicuculline application. Eighteen out of 24 SpVc neurons showed signs of expansion of the receptive field size after iontophoretic application of bicuculline. These changes showed a current-dependent manner and were reversed in approximately 15–20 min. Iontophoretic application of the GABAA agonist muscimol induced a current-related inhibition of neuronal activity elicited by touch/pressure and pinch stimuli as well as a decrease in the size of receptive fields. The facilitation of evoked responses and receptive field expansion of SpVc neuron induced by bicuculline application were blocked by coapplication of muscimol (50 nA, 5 min). These results suggest that a local mechanism acting via GABAA receptors normally exerts a tonic inhibition of mechanoreceptive transmission in the trigeminal spinal nucleus neurons and this effect may limit responsiveness and size of receptive fields.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Electronic Publication
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takeda, M., Tanimoto, T. & Matsumoto, S. Change in mechanical receptive field properties induced by GABAA receptor activation in the trigeminal spinal nucleus caudalis neurons in rats. Exp Brain Res 134, 409–416 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210000514
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210000514