Skip to main content
Log in

Age-related differences in functional tool-use are due to changes in movement quality and not simply motor slowing

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Age-related declines in fine motor control may impact tool-use and thereby limit functional independence. Most previous research has, however, focused on the effect of aging on gross motor tasks. Few studies have investigated the effects of aging on the strategy or quality of fine motor skills, especially in tool-use, which may better reflect how age impacts complex movement capability. Twenty-two young (ages 19–35) and 18 older adults (ages 58–87) performed a timed upper extremity task using a tool to acquire and transport objects to different locations. Overall task performance was divided into two phases based on 3-D position of the tool: a gross motor phase (object transport) and a fine motor phase (object acquisition). Overall, older adults took longer to complete the task. A linear model indicated that this was due to the duration of the fine motor phase more so than the gross motor phase. To identify age-related differences in the quality of the fine motor phase, we fit three-dimensional ellipsoids to individual data and the calculated the ellipsoid volume. Results demonstrated a significant volume-by-age interaction, whereby increased ellipsoid volume (space the tool occupied) related to increased mean dwell time for the older adult group only; younger adults did not demonstrate this relationship. Additionally, older adults with longer movement times during the fine motor phase also had lower cognitive scores. No age-related differences were observed for the gross motor phase, suggesting that age-related declines in tool-use may be due to changes in fine motor control and cognitive status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Metadata that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability (software application or custom code)

Code used to calculate ellipsoid hull can be found at the following github: https://github.com/hooymana/Ellipsoid.

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant number K01AG047926 to SYS]. This sponsor did not have any role in the following: the study design; the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; the writing of the paper; nor the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Author AH contributed to literature search, writing, data analysis, figure creation, data interpretation, and drafting/revising the manuscript. Author PW contributed to data collection, data interpretation, and revising the manuscript. Author SYS contributed to literature search, writing, figure creation, study design, data interpretation, and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sydney Y. Schaefer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no disclosures to report.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Arizona State University Institutional Review Board (Study 00004214 and 00009764), and was therefore performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to participate

All individuals provided informed consent prior to participation.

Additional information

Communicated by Bill J Yates.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 91 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hooyman, A., Wang, P. & Schaefer, S.Y. Age-related differences in functional tool-use are due to changes in movement quality and not simply motor slowing. Exp Brain Res 239, 1617–1626 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06084-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06084-x

Keywords

Navigation