Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attention orienting near the hand following performed and imagined actions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies have documented that the hand’s ability to perform actions affects the visual processing and attention for objects near the hand, suggesting that actions may have specific effects on visual orienting. However, most research on the relation between spatial attention and action focuses on actions as responses to visual attention manipulations. The current study examines visual attention immediately following an executed or imagined action. A modified spatial cuing paradigm tested whether a brief, lateralized hand-pinch performed by a visually hidden hand near the target location, facilitated or inhibited subsequent visual target detection. Conditions in which hand-pinches were fully executed (action) were compared to ones with no hand-pinch (inaction) in Experiment 1 and imagined pinches (imagine) in Experiment 2. Results from Experiment 1 indicated that performed hand pinches facilitated rather than inhibited subsequent detection responses to targets appearing near the pinch, but target detection was not affected by inaction. In Experiment 2, both action and imagined action conditions cued attention and facilitated responses, but along differing time courses. These results highlight the ongoing nature of visual attention and demonstrate how it is deployed to locations even following actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams RA, Davoli CC, Du F, Knapp WH, Paull D (2008) Altered vision near the hands. Cognition 107:1035–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berthoz A (1991) Brain mechanisms in the perception and control of movement. In: Orban GA, Wolf S, Hillsdale NJ (eds) Cognitive neuroscience: research directions in cognitive neuroscience: European perspectives, vol 4. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, England, pp 43–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen A, Ilg W, Giese MA (2011) Spatiotemporal tuning of the facilitation of biological motion perception by concurrent motor execution. J Neurosci 31:3493–3499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cosman JD, Vecera SP (2010) Attention affects visual perceptual processing near the hand. Psychol Sci 21:1254–1258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cousineau D (2005) Confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 1:42–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decety J (1996) Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate? Cogn Brain Res 3:87–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone R, Duncan J (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 18:193–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deubel H, Schneider WX, Paprotta (1998) Selective dorsal and ventral processing: evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception. Vis Cogn 5:81–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan J (2006) Brain mechanisms of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 59:2–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frak V, Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M (2001) Orientation of the opposition axis in mentally simulated grasping. Exp Brain Res 136:120–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garza J, Strom M, Wright CE, Roberts R, Reed CL (2013) Top-down influences mediate hand bias in spatial attention. Atten Percept Psychophys 75:819–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gherri E, Eimer M (2010) Manual response preparation disrupts spatial attention: an electrophysiological investigation of links between action and attention. Neuropsychologia 48:961–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb JD, Reed CL (2002) Trunk Orientation induces neglect-like lateral biases in covert attention. Psychol Sci 13:553–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb J, Reed CL, Bate S, Garza JP, Roberts RJ Jr (2008) Walking reveals trunk orientation bias for visual attention. Percept Psychophys 70:688–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herwig A (2015) Linking perception and action by structure or process? Toward an integrative perspective. Neurosci Behav Rev 52:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B (2004) Event files: feature binding in and across perception and across. Trends Cogn Sci 8:494–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849–878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard LA, Tipper SP (1997) Hand deviations away from visual cues: indirect evidence for inhibition. Exp Brain Res 113:144–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1995) Mental imagery in the motor cortex. Neuropsychologia 33:1419–1432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennett S, Spence C, Driver J (2002) Visuo-tactile links in covert exogenous spatial attention remap across changes in unseen hand posture. Percept Psychophys 64:1083–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RM (2000) Inhibition of return. Trends Cogn Sci 4(4):138–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luck SJ, Vecera SP (2002) Attention. In: Pashler H, Yantis S (eds) Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology, vol 1 sensation and perception, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 235–286

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay DG (1987) The organization of perception and action: a theory for language and other cognitive skills. Springer, Berlin, p 255

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Cohen Y (1984). Components of visual orienting. In Bouma H, Bowhuis D (eds) Attention and performance X. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, pp 531–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Rafal RD, Choate LS, Vaughan J (1985) Inhibition of return: neural basis and function. Cogn Neuropsychol 2:211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt J, Abrams RA (1994) Action-centered inhibition: effects of distractors on movement planning and execution. Hum Mov Sci 13:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz W (1997) Perception and action planning. Eur J Cogn Psychol 9:129–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed CL (2002) Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: visualizing vs. physically performing springboard dives. Mem Cogn 30:1169–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed CL, Grubb JD, Steele C (2006) Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32:166–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed CL, Betz R, Garza J, Roberts R (2010) Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Atten Percept Psychophys 72:236–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristic J, Wright A, Kingstone A (2007) Attentional control and reflexive orienting to gaze and arrow cues. Psychon Bull Rev 14:964–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti G, Riggio L, Dascola I, Umiltá C (1987) Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 25:31–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiegg A, Deubel H, Schneider WX (2003) Attentional selection during preparation of prehension movements. Vis Cogn 10:409–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence C, Pavani F, Driver J (2000) Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26(4):1298–1319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor TL, Klein RM (1998) On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychon Bull Rev 5(4):625–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas LE (2015) Grasp posture alters visual processing biases near the hands. Psychol Sci 26:625–632

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper SP (1992) Selection for action: the role of inhibitory mechanisms. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1:105–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper SP, Howard LA, Houghton G (1999) Action-based mechanisms of attention. In: Humphreys GW, Duncan J, Treisman A (eds) Attention, space, and action: studies in cognitive neuroscience. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 232–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman A (2004) Psychological issues in selective attention. In: The cognitive neurosciences, 3rd edn. MIT, Cambridge, pp 529–544

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, USA

    John P. Garza

  2. Department of Psychology, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, USA

    Catherine L. Reed

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, USA

    Ralph J. Roberts Jr.

Authors
  1. John P. Garza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catherine L. Reed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ralph J. Roberts Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Garza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garza, J.P., Reed, C.L. & Roberts, R.J. Attention orienting near the hand following performed and imagined actions. Exp Brain Res 236, 2603–2610 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5307-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5307-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation