Abstract
In this event-related potential (ERP) study, we investigated the effects of format change and semantic relatedness in a recognition task using pairs composed of a word and a line drawing. The semantic relatedness of the pairs (related: rabbit–carrot; unrelated: duck–artichoke) influenced their associative properties and corresponding distinctiveness, while format change refers to the switching of an item from the verbal form to the line drawing form between study and recognition (e.g., the word “egg” is associated with a drawing of a hen at study, and a line drawing of an egg is associated with the word “hen” at test). Study–test format change thus prevents visual matching while maintaining conceptual matching. While the N300 potential was only modulated by the semantic relatedness of the pair, both factors modulated recognition performance and corresponding ERP old/new effects with larger mid-frontal N400 old/new effect (300–500 ms) and larger parietal old/new effect (500–800 ms) in the same compared to the different-format condition, as well as for related compared to unrelated pairs. Furthermore, the semantic relatedness of correctly recognized old pairs modulated the anterior N400 while it modulated the posterior N400 for correctly rejected pairs. These results suggest that semantic relatedness and familiarity related to the amount of change between study and test present distinct ERP signatures in the N400 window. They suggest also that the distinctiveness and the ease of the retrieval of the pair could be determining for the parietal old/new effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alario FX, Ferrand L (1999) A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 31(3):531–552
Ally BA, Budson AE (2007) The worth of pictures: using high density event-related potentials to understand the memorial power of pictures and the dynamics of recognition memory. NeuroImage 35(1):378–395
Bader R, Opitz B, Reith W, Mecklinger A (2014) Is a novel conceptual unit more than the sum of its parts? FMRI evidence from an associative recognition memory study. Neuropsychologia 61:123–134
Bridger EK, Bader R, Kriukova O, Unger K, Mecklinger A (2012) The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400. Neuroimage 63(3):1334–1342
Bridger EK, Bader R, Mecklinger A (2014) More ways than one: ERPs reveal multiple familiarity signals in the word frequency mirror effect. Neuropsychologia 57:179–190
Bridger EK, Sprondel V, Mecklinger A (2015) Control over recollection varies with context-type: ERP evidence from the exclusion task. Cogn Neurosci 6(1):31–38
Chatrian GE, Lettich E, Nelson PL (1988) Modified nomenclature for the “10%” electrode system. J Clin Neurophysiol 5:183–186
Curran T, Doyle J (2011) Picture superiority doubly dissociates the ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. J Cogn Neurosci 23(5):1247–1262
Diana RA, Ranganath C (2011) Recollection, familiarity and memory strength: confusion about confounds. Trends Cogn Sci 15(8):337–338
Diana RA, Reder LM, Arndt J, Park H (2006) Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychon Bull Rev 13(1):1–21
Diana RA, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C (2007) Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model. Trends Cogn Sci 11(9):379–386
Ecker UK, Zimmer HD (2009) ERP evidence for flexible adjustment of retrieval orientation and its influence on familiarity. J Cogn Neurosci 21(10):1907–1919
Ecker UKH, Zimmer HD, Groh-Bordin C (2007a) The influence of object and background color manipulations on the electrophysiological indices of recognition memory. Brain Res 1185:221–230
Ecker UKH, Zimmer HD, Groh-Bordin C, Mecklinger A (2007b) Context effects on familiarity are familiarity effects of context—an electrophysiological study. Int J Psychophysiol 64(2):146–156
Elbert T, Lutzenberger W, Rockstroh B, Birbaumer N (1985) Removal of ocular artifacts from the EEG—a biophysical approach to the EOG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 60(5):455–463
Gallo DA, Weiss JA, Schacter DL (2004) Reducing false recognition with criterial recollection tests: distinctiveness heuristic versus criterion shifts. J Mem Lang 51(3):473–493
Gallo DA, Cotel SC, Moore CD, Schacter DL (2007) Aging can spare recollection-based retrieval monitoring: the importance of event distinctiveness. Psychol Aging 22(1):209
Groh-Bordin C, Zimmer HD, Ecker UKH (2006) Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection. NeuroImage 32(4):1879–1890
Guillaume F, Etienne Y (2015) Target-context unitization effect on the familiarity-related FN400: a face recognition exclusion task. Int J Psychophysiol 95:345–354
Guillaume F, Tiberghien G (2013) Impact of intention on the ERP correlates of face recognition. Brain Cogn 81(1):73–81
Guillaume F, Guillem F, Tiberghien G, Stip E (2012a) Mismatched expressions decrease face recognition and corresponding ERP old/new effects in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology 26(5):568–577
Guillaume F, Guillem F, Tiberghien G, Stip E (2012b) ERP investigation of study-test background mismatch during face recognition in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 134(1):101–109
Hayes SM, Verfaellie M (2012) The impact of fluency on explicit memory tasks in amnesia. Cogn Neurosci 3(3–4):216–217
Henke K (2010) A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nat Rev Neurosci 11(7):523–532
Huebner GM, Gegenfurtner KR (2012) Conceptual and visual features contribute to visual memory for natural images. PLoS ONE 7(6):e37575
Jacoby LL (1991) A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. J Mem Lang 30(5):513–541
Ko PC, Duda B, Hussey EP, Ally BA (2013) Electrophysiological distinctions between recognition memory with and withoutawareness. Neuropsychologia 51(4):642–655
Kriukova O, Bridger E, Mecklinger A (2013) Semantic relations differentially impact associative recognition memory: electrophysiological evidence. Brain Cogn 83(1):93–103
Lucas HD, Taylor JR, Henson RN, Paller KA (2012) Many roads lead to recognition: electrophysiological correlates of familiarity derived from short-term masked repetition priming. Neuropsychologia 50(13):3041–3052
Mandler G (1980) Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence. Psychol Rev 87(3):252
Mandler G (2008) Familiarity breeds attempts: a critical review of dual-process theories of recognition. Perspect Psychol Sci 3(5):390–399
Marzi T, Viggiano MP (2010) Deep and shallow encoding effects on face recognition: an ERP study. Int J Psychophysiol 78(3):239–250
McCarthy G, Wood CC (1985) Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 62(3):203–208
McPherson WB, Holcomb PJ (1999) An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. Psychophysiology 36(01):53–65
Mecklinger A, Frings C, Rosburg T (2012) Response to Paller et al.: the role of familiarity in making inferences about unknown quantities. Trends Cogn Sci 16(6):315–316
Mickes L, Johnson EM, Wixted JT (2010) Continuous recollection versus unitized familiarity in associative recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 36(4):843–863
Mudrik L, Shalgi S, Lamy D, Deouell LY (2014) Synchronous contextual irregularities affect early scene processing: Replication and extension. Neuropsychologia 56:447–458
Nyhus E, Curran T (2009) Semantic and perceptual effects on recognition memory: evidence from ERP. Brain Res 1283:102–114
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1):97–113
Opitz B, Cornell S (2006) Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: insights from event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 18(9):1595–1605
Ortu D, Allan K, Donaldson DI (2013) Is the N400 effect a neurophysiological index of associative relationships? Neuropsychologia 51(9):1742–1748
Paller KA, Voss JL, Boehm SG (2007) Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends Cogn Sci 11(6):243–250
Paller KA, Lucas HD, Voss JL (2012) Assuming too much from “familiar”brain potentials. Trends Cogn Sci 16(6):313–315
Rajaram S, Geraci L (2000) Conceptual fluency selectively influences knowing. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 26(4):1070
Reder LM, Donavos DK, Erickson MA (2002) Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: the role of contextual fan. Mem Cogn 30(2):312–323
Rhodes SM, Donaldson DI (2007) Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: enhancing familiarity based remembering. Neuropsychologia 45(2):412–424
Rosburg T, Mecklinger A, Frings C (2011) When the Brain Decides: a Familiarity-Based Approach to the Recognition Heuristic as Evidenced by Event-Related Brain Potentials. Psychol Sci 22(12):1527–1534
Rugg MD, Curran T (2007) Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends Cogn Sci 11(6):251–257
Schloerscheidt A, Rugg MD (2004) The impact of change in stimulus format on the electrophysiological indices of recognition. Neuropsychologia 42(4):451–466
Shiffrin RM, Steyvers M (1997) A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory. Psychon Bull Rev 4(2):145–166
Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M (1980) A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 6(2):174
Speer NK, Curran T (2007) ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection processes in visual associative recognition. Brain Res 1174:97–109
Tibon R, Gronau N, Scheuplein A-L, Mecklinger A, Levy DA (2014) Associative recognition processes are modulated by the semantic unitizability of memoranda. Brain Cogn 92:19–31
Tsivilis D, Otten LJ, Rugg MD (2001) Context effects on the neural correlates of recognition memory: an electrophysiological study. Neuron 31(3):497–505
Van Herten M, Kolk HH, Chwilla DJ (2005) An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cogn Brain Res 22(2):241–255
Vilberg KL, Moosavi RF, Rugg MD (2006) The relationship between electrophysiological correlates of recollection and amount of information retrieved. Brain Res 1122(1):161–170
Voss JL, Federmeier KD (2011) FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing. Psychophysiology 48(4):532–546
Voss JL, Hauner KK, Paller KA (2009) Establishing a relationship between activity reduction in human perirhinal cortex and priming. Hippocampus 19(9):773–778
Voss JL, Lucas HD, Paller KA (2012) More than a feeling: pervasive influences of memory without awareness of retrieval. Cogn Neurosci 3(3–4):193–207
Wang W, Yonelinas AP (2012) Familiarity is related to conceptual implicit memory: an examination of individual differences. Psychon Bull Rev 19(6):1154–1164
Wang WC, Lazzara MM, Ranganath C, Knight RT, Yonelinas AP (2010) The medial temporal lobe supports conceptual implicit memory. Neuron 68(5):835–842
Wilding EL (2000) In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? Int J Psychophysiol 35(1):81
Wixted JT (2007) Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychol Rev 114(1):152–176
Woroch B, Gonsalves BD (2010) Event-related potential correlates of item and source memory strength. Brain Res 1317:180–191
Yonelinas AP (2002) The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30 years of research. J Mem Lang 46(3):441–517
Yonelinas AP, Aly M, Wang WC, Koen JD (2010) Recollection and familiarity: examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus 20(11):1178–1194
Zimmer HD, Ecker UKH (2010) Remembering perceptual features unequally bound in object and episodic tokens: neural mechanisms and their electrophysiological correlates. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34(7):1066–1079
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant awarded to Fabrice Guillaume by the Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) interdisciplinary program (No. AO2008-1) and a special delegation fund from the CNRS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guillaume, F., Baier, S., Bourgeois, M. et al. Format change and semantic relatedness effects on the ERP correlates of recognition: old pairs, new pairs, different stories. Exp Brain Res 235, 1007–1019 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4859-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4859-2