Skip to main content
Log in

Repetitive spinal motor neuron discharges following single transcranial magnetic stimulation: relation to dexterity

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation allows to study the properties of the human corticospinal tract non-invasively. After a single transcranial magnetic stimulus, spinal motor neurons (MNs) sometimes fire not just once, but repetitively. The biological significance of such repetitive MN discharges (repMNDs) is unknown. To study the relation of repMNDs to other measures of cortico-muscular excitability and to physiological measures of the skill for finely tuned precision movements, we used a previously described quadruple stimulation (QuadS) technique (Z’Graggen et al. 2005) to quantify the amount of repMNDs in abductor digiti minimi muscles (ADMs) on both sides of 20 right-handed healthy subjects. Skillfulness for finger precision movements of both hands was assessed using a finger tapping task. In 16 subjects, a follow-up examination was performed after training of either precision movements (n = 8) or force (n = 8) of the left ADM. The size of the QuadS response (amplitude and area ratios) was greater in the dominant right hand than in the left hand (QuadS amplitude ratio: 47.1 ± 18.1 versus 37.7 ± 22.0%, Wilcoxon test: P < 0.05; QuadS area ratio: 49.7 ± 16.2% versus 36.9 ± 23.0%, Wilcoxon test: P < 0.05), pointing to a greater amount of repMNDs. Moreover, the QuadS amplitude and area increased significantly after finger precision training, but not after force training. This increase of repMNDs correlated significantly with the increase in performance in the finger tapping task. Our results demonstrate that repMNDs are related to handedness and therefore probably reflect supraspinal excitability differences. The increase of repMNDs after skills training but not after force training supports the hypothesis of a supraspinal origin of repMNDs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arányi Z, Mathis J, Hess CW, Rösler KM (1998) Task-dependent facilitation of motor evoked potentials during dynamic and steady muscle contractions. Muscle Nerve 21:1309–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berardelli A, Inghilleri M, Rothwell JC, Cruccu G, Manfredi M (1991) Multiple firing of motoneurones is produced by cortical stimulation but not by direct activation of descending motor tracts. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 81:240–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer B, Sale MV, Nordstrom MA (2001) Asymmetry of motor cortex excitability during a simple motor task: relationships with handedness and manual performance. Exp Brain Res 138:467–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bühler R, Magistris MR, Truffert A, Hess CW, Rösler KM (2001) The triple stimulation technique to study central motor conduction to the lower limbs. Clin Neurophysiol 112:938–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cantello R, Gianelli M, Civardi C, Mutani R (1992) Magnetic brain stimulation: the silent period after the motor evoked potential. Neurology 42:1951–1959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll TJ, Riek S, Carson RG (2002) The sites of neural adaptation induced by resistance training in humans. J Physiol 544:641–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Civardi C, Cavalli A, Naldi P, Varrasi C, Cantello R (2000) Hemispheric asymmetries of cortico-cortical connections in human hand motor areas. Clin Neurophysiol 111:624–629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Classen J, Liepert J, Wise SP, Hallett M, Cohen LG (1998) Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol 79:1117–1123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conforto AB, Z’Graggen WJ, Kohl AS, Rösler KM, Kaelin-Lang A (2004) Impact of coil position and electrophysiological monitoring on determination of motor thresholds to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 115:812–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day BL, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Dick JP, Cowan JM, Berardelli A, Marsden CD (1987) Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2. Multiple descending volleys. Brain 110:1191–1209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Gennaro L, Cristiani R, Bertini M, Curcio G, Ferrara M, Fratello F, Romei V, Rossini PM (2004) Handedness is mainly associated with an asymmetry of corticospinal excitability and not of transcallosal inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 115:1305–1312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Espiritu MG, Lin CS, Burke D (2003) Motoneuron excitability and the F wave. Muscle Nerve 27:720–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NM (1987) Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. J Physiol 388:397–419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JL, Marstrand PC, Nielsen JB (2005) Motor skill training and strength training are associated with different plastic changes in the central nervous system. J Appl Physiol 99:1558–1568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krings T, Buchbinder BR, Butler WE, Chiappa KH, Jiang HJ, Cosgrove GR, Rosen BR (1997) Functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation: complementary approaches in the evaluation of cortical motor function. Neurology 48:1406–1416

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JZ, Floeter MK (2004) Do F-wave measurements detect changes in motor neuron excitability? Muscle Nerve 30:289–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magistris MR, Rösler KM, Truffert A, Myers JP (1998) Transcranial stimulation excites virtually all motor neurons supplying the target muscle. A demonstration and a method improving the study of motor evoked potentials. Brain 121:437–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Magistris MR, Rösler KM, Truffert A, Landis T, Hess CW (1999) A clinical study of motor evoked potentials using a triple stimulation technique. Brain 122:265–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mercuri B, Wassermann EM, Manganotti P, Ikoma K, Samii A, Hallett M (1996) Cortical modulation of spinal excitability: an F-wave study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 101:16–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muellbacher W, Ziemann U, Boroojerdi B, Cohen L, Hallett M (2001) Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning. Exp Brain Res 136:431–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naka D, Mills KR (2000) Further evidence for corticomotor hyperexcitability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 23:1044–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Netz J, Ziemann U, Homberg V (1995) Hemispheric asymmetry of transcallosal inhibition in man. Exp Brain Res 104:527–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone A, Nguyet D, Cohen LG, Brasil-Neto JP, Cammarota A, Hallett M (1995) Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. J Neurophysiol 74:1037–1045

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez MA, Lungholt BK, Nyborg K, Nielsen JB (2004) Motor skill training induces changes in the excitability of the leg cortical area in healthy humans. Exp Brain Res 159:197–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Remple MS, Bruneau RM, VandenBerg PM, Goertzen C, Kleim JA (2001) Sensitivity of cortical movement representations to motor experience: evidence that skill learning but not strength training induces cortical reorganization. Behav Brain Res 123:133–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rösler KM, Petrow E, Mathis J, Aranyi Z, Hess CW, Magistris MR (2002) Effect of discharge desynchronization on the size of motor evoked potentials: an analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1680–1687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A, Caramia MD, Caruso G, Cracco RQ, Dimitrijevic MR, Hallett M, Katayama Y, Lucking CH et al (1994) Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 91:79–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth G, Magistris MR (1987) Detection of conduction block by monopolar percutaneous stimulation of the brachial plexus. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 27:45–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi S, Kimura J, Yanagisawa T, Okada F, Yamada T, Ootsuka T (2007) Rest-induced suppression of anterior horn cell excitability as measured by F waves: comparison between volitionally inactivated and control muscles. Muscle Nerve 37:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triggs WJ, Subramanium B, Rossi F (1999) Hand preference and transcranial magnetic stimulation asymmetry of cortical motor representation. Brain Res 835:324–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Z’Graggen WJ, Humm AM, Durisch N, Magistris MR, Rösler KM (2005) Repetitive spinal motor neuron discharges following single transcranial magnetic stimuli: a quantitative study. Clin Neurophysiol 116:1628–1637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Swiss National Science foundation (Grant 3200B0-100701). A.M.H. was supported by a Swiss national grant for a fellowship in clinical neurophysiology (Grant 31-226).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. J. Z’Graggen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Z’Graggen, W.J., Humm, A.M., Oppliger-Bachmann, S. et al. Repetitive spinal motor neuron discharges following single transcranial magnetic stimulation: relation to dexterity. Exp Brain Res 188, 579–587 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1389-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1389-6

Keywords

Navigation