Skip to main content
Log in

Pitch and space maps of skilled cellists: accuracy, variability, and error correction

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a newly developed method that combines finger position tracking and spectral analysis of the concurrent acoustic record, we studied the accuracy and variability of pitch performance in eight skilled cellists and the role of acoustic feedback in their performance. The tasks required shifting movements between pairs of notes and separated by various distances (pitch intervals) on a single string at the rate of 1 note/s. The same tasks were performed either using the bow, providing acoustic feedback, or without the bow. Overall, our subjects exhibited a high degree of accuracy in executing tasks when using the bow. When using the bow, two types of variability were observed: (1) trial-to-trial variability: in most subjects the mean fundamental frequency of a single nominal note was significantly different from trial to trial; and (2) within-trial variability. The within-trial variability includes two sub-types: (a) the pitch of a given note changed between notes within a 50-note trial; and (b) within a single note there were positional changes that we hypothesize are attempts by the performer to adjust the fundamental pitch within the note. When acoustic feedback was absent, note distributions were shifted, multimodal, and had large variability; error-correction movements within a single note also significantly decreased, indicating that the stability and precision of the motor map depends on constant re-calibration and updating by acoustic information. Our results suggest that a performer’s intonation should not be viewed as a fixed entity implied by the score but as a sample from a statistical distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baader AP, Kazennikov O, Wiesendanger M (2005) Coordination of bowing and fingering in violin playing. Cogn Brain Res 23:436–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger J (1991) The mind behind the musical ear. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LE, Rosenbaum DA, Sainburg RL (2003) Limb position drift: implications for control of posture and movement. J Neurophysiol 90:3105–3118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Woollacott M, Pologe S (2006) Accuracy and underlying mechanisms of shifting movements in cellists. Exp Brain Res 174:467–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drake C, Palmer C (2000) Skill acquisition in music performance: relations between planning and temporal control. Cognition 74:1–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finney SA, Palmer C (2003) Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: sound evidence for an encoding effect. Mem Cognit 31(1):51–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fyk J (1995) Melodic intonation, psychoacoustics, and the violin. Organon, Zielona Gora

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsson A (2003) Music performance research at the millennium. Psychol Music 31(1):221–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates A, Bradshaw JL (1974) Effects of auditory feedback on a musical performance task. Percept Psychophys 16(1):105–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg LS (1983) Western violoncello art of the 19th and 20th centuries, excluding Russian and Soviet schools. Paganiniana, Neptune City

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson CR, Hain TC (2007) Effects of simultaneous perturbations of voice pitch and loudness feedback on voice F0 and amplitude control. J Acoust Soc Am 121(5):2862–2872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore GP, Hary D, Naill R (1988) Trills: some initial observations. Psychomusicology 7:153–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison S (2000) Effect of melodic context, tuning behaviors, and experience on the intonation accuracy of wind players. J Res Music Educ 48:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer C (1997) Music performance. Ann Rev Psychol 48:115–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer C, Meyer R (2000) Conceptual and motor learning in music performance. Psychol Sci 11:63–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce JR (1983) The science of musical sound. Scientific American Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Repp BH (1999) Effects of auditory feedback deprivation on expressive piano performance. Music Percept 16(4):409–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Winold H, Thelen E, Ulrich BD (1994) Coordination and control in the bow arm movements of highly skilled cellists. Ecol Psychol 6(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zatorre RJ, Chen JL, Penhune VB (2007) When the brain plays music: auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:547–558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Gary Felsing (Motus Bioengineering, CA, USA) and Dmitry Rozhetskin for support and assistance in the experimental trials. The authors also wish to thank Bruno Repp and another anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments on the earlier version of this manuscript. This research was partially supported by a grant from the GRAMMY Foundation. http://www.grammyfoundation.com/grants

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessie Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, J., Woollacott, M.H., Pologe, S. et al. Pitch and space maps of skilled cellists: accuracy, variability, and error correction. Exp Brain Res 188, 493–503 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1380-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1380-2

Keywords

Navigation