Skip to main content
Log in

Motor synergies: feedback and error compensation within and between trials

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to examine the influence of visual feedback on compensatory variations in force within and between trials. In Experiment 1, the task was to maintain a constant force of 5 N for 15 s using both index fingers. In Experiment 2, the task was to produce discrete force pulses such that the peak value of the sum of the two finger forces was 5 N. In both experiments, there were three conditions that manipulated the amount of visual feedback of the force trace. Results showed that the within-trial correlations between the finger forces increased when feedback was degraded, indicating that the two fingers were increasingly constrained toward acting as a single unit. Similarly, between-trial correlations showed that the amount of error compensation decreased when feedback was removed, indicating that participants produced a smaller set of goal equivalent solutions. It appears that feedback has a dual role in coordination—removing the constraints on the degrees of freedom within trials, and facilitating the utilization of redundancy between trials. The distinction between these two classes of variation is central to understanding the redundancy problem in motor control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandrov A, Frolov A, Massion J (1998) Axial synergies during human upper trunk bending. Exp Brain Res 118:210–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arutyunyan GA, Gurfinkel VS, Mirskii ML (1969) Organization of movements on execution by man of an exact postural task. Biophysics 14:1162–1167

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein NA (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Avella A, Bizzi E (2005) Shared and specific muscle synergies in natural motor behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3076–3081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM, Latash ML (1998) On the problem of adequate language in motor control. Motor Control 2:306–313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM, Tsetlin ML (1971) Mathematical modeling of mechanisms of the central nervous system. In: Gelfand IM, Gurfinkel VS, Fomin SV, Tsetlin ML (eds) Models of the structural functional organization of certain biological systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman SR, Latash ML (2005) Feed-forward control of a redundant motor system. Biol Cybern 95:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb GL, Song Q, Hong DA, Corcos DM (1996) Coordinating movement at two joints: a principle of linear covariance. J Neurophysiol 75:1760–1764

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greene PH (1969) Seeking mathematical models for skilled actions. In: Bootzin D, Muffley HC (eds) Biomechanics (proceedings of the First Rock Island Arsenal biomechanics symposium). Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken H (1996) Principles of brain functioning. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS, Tuller B, Bateson EV, Fowler CA (1984) Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures. J Exp Psychol Hum 10:812–832

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2002) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 20:26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Shim JK, Smilga AV, Zatsiorsky V (2005) A central back-coupling hypothesis on the organization of motor synergies: a physical metaphor and a neural model. Biol Cybern 92:186–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald PV, van Emmerik REA, Newell KM (1989) The effects of practice on limb kinematics in a throwing task. J Mot Behav 21:245–264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mechsner F, Kerzel D, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2001) Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 414:69–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison SM, Newell KM (1998) Interlimb coupling as a function of isometric force output. J Mot Behav 30:323–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Dawson AM, Challis JH (2006) Haptic tracking permits bimanual independence. J Exp Psychol Hum 32:1266–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA (1976) The schema as a solution to some persistent problems in motor learning theory. In: Stelmach G (ed) Motor control: issues and trends. Academic Press, NY, pp 41–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Schöner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126:289–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Kang N, Patterson D, Latash ML (2003) Uncontrolled manifold analysis of single trials during multi-finger force production by persons with and without Down syndrome. Exp Brain Res 153:45–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnoff J, Newell KM (2005) Intermittent visual information and the multiple time scales of visual motor control of continuous isometric force production. Percept Psychophys 67:335–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5:1226–1235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuller B, Turvey MT, Fitch HL (1982) The Bernstein perspective II: the concept of muscle linkage or coordinative structure. In: Kelso JAS (ed) Human motor behavior: an introduction. Erlbaum, NJ, pp 253–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey MT, Shaw RE, Mace W (1978) Issues in a theory of action: degrees of freedom, coordinative structures, and coalitions. In: Requin J (ed) Attention and performance VII. Erlbaum, NJ, pp 557–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt DE, Russell DM (2002) Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production. Exp Brain Res 145:275–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt DE, Haibach PS, Newell KM (2006) Visual angle is the critical variable mediating gain-related effects in manual control. Exp Brain Res 173:742–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vereijken B, van Emmerik REA, Whiting HTA, Newell KM (1992) Free(z)ing degrees of freedom in skill acquisition. J Mot Behav 24:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD (1984) Engineering psychology and human performance. Merrill, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Winter JL, Stein F (1992) Evidence for an error deadzone in compensatory tracking. J Mot Behav 24:299–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JF, Scholz JP (2005) Learning a throwing task is associated with differential changes in the use of motor abundance. Exp Brain Res 163:137–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajiv Ranganathan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ranganathan, R., Newell, K.M. Motor synergies: feedback and error compensation within and between trials. Exp Brain Res 186, 561–570 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1259-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1259-7

Keywords

Navigation