Abstract
The aim of the current study was to examine the influence of visual feedback on compensatory variations in force within and between trials. In Experiment 1, the task was to maintain a constant force of 5 N for 15 s using both index fingers. In Experiment 2, the task was to produce discrete force pulses such that the peak value of the sum of the two finger forces was 5 N. In both experiments, there were three conditions that manipulated the amount of visual feedback of the force trace. Results showed that the within-trial correlations between the finger forces increased when feedback was degraded, indicating that the two fingers were increasingly constrained toward acting as a single unit. Similarly, between-trial correlations showed that the amount of error compensation decreased when feedback was removed, indicating that participants produced a smaller set of goal equivalent solutions. It appears that feedback has a dual role in coordination—removing the constraints on the degrees of freedom within trials, and facilitating the utilization of redundancy between trials. The distinction between these two classes of variation is central to understanding the redundancy problem in motor control.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexandrov A, Frolov A, Massion J (1998) Axial synergies during human upper trunk bending. Exp Brain Res 118:210–220
Arutyunyan GA, Gurfinkel VS, Mirskii ML (1969) Organization of movements on execution by man of an exact postural task. Biophysics 14:1162–1167
Bernstein NA (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon, Oxford
d’Avella A, Bizzi E (2005) Shared and specific muscle synergies in natural motor behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3076–3081
Gelfand IM, Latash ML (1998) On the problem of adequate language in motor control. Motor Control 2:306–313
Gelfand IM, Tsetlin ML (1971) Mathematical modeling of mechanisms of the central nervous system. In: Gelfand IM, Gurfinkel VS, Fomin SV, Tsetlin ML (eds) Models of the structural functional organization of certain biological systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1–22
Goodman SR, Latash ML (2005) Feed-forward control of a redundant motor system. Biol Cybern 95:271–280
Gottlieb GL, Song Q, Hong DA, Corcos DM (1996) Coordinating movement at two joints: a principle of linear covariance. J Neurophysiol 75:1760–1764
Greene PH (1969) Seeking mathematical models for skilled actions. In: Bootzin D, Muffley HC (eds) Biomechanics (proceedings of the First Rock Island Arsenal biomechanics symposium). Plenum, New York
Haken H (1996) Principles of brain functioning. Springer, New York
Kelso JAS, Tuller B, Bateson EV, Fowler CA (1984) Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures. J Exp Psychol Hum 10:812–832
Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2002) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 20:26–31
Latash ML, Shim JK, Smilga AV, Zatsiorsky V (2005) A central back-coupling hypothesis on the organization of motor synergies: a physical metaphor and a neural model. Biol Cybern 92:186–191
McDonald PV, van Emmerik REA, Newell KM (1989) The effects of practice on limb kinematics in a throwing task. J Mot Behav 21:245–264
Mechsner F, Kerzel D, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2001) Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 414:69–73
Morrison SM, Newell KM (1998) Interlimb coupling as a function of isometric force output. J Mot Behav 30:323–342
Rosenbaum DA, Dawson AM, Challis JH (2006) Haptic tracking permits bimanual independence. J Exp Psychol Hum 32:1266–1275
Schmidt RA (1976) The schema as a solution to some persistent problems in motor learning theory. In: Stelmach G (ed) Motor control: issues and trends. Academic Press, NY, pp 41–66
Scholz JP, Schöner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126:289–306
Scholz JP, Kang N, Patterson D, Latash ML (2003) Uncontrolled manifold analysis of single trials during multi-finger force production by persons with and without Down syndrome. Exp Brain Res 153:45–58
Sosnoff J, Newell KM (2005) Intermittent visual information and the multiple time scales of visual motor control of continuous isometric force production. Percept Psychophys 67:335–334
Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5:1226–1235
Tuller B, Turvey MT, Fitch HL (1982) The Bernstein perspective II: the concept of muscle linkage or coordinative structure. In: Kelso JAS (ed) Human motor behavior: an introduction. Erlbaum, NJ, pp 253–270
Turvey MT, Shaw RE, Mace W (1978) Issues in a theory of action: degrees of freedom, coordinative structures, and coalitions. In: Requin J (ed) Attention and performance VII. Erlbaum, NJ, pp 557–598
Vaillancourt DE, Russell DM (2002) Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production. Exp Brain Res 145:275–285
Vaillancourt DE, Haibach PS, Newell KM (2006) Visual angle is the critical variable mediating gain-related effects in manual control. Exp Brain Res 173:742–750
Vereijken B, van Emmerik REA, Whiting HTA, Newell KM (1992) Free(z)ing degrees of freedom in skill acquisition. J Mot Behav 24:133–142
Wickens CD (1984) Engineering psychology and human performance. Merrill, Columbus
Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Winter JL, Stein F (1992) Evidence for an error deadzone in compensatory tracking. J Mot Behav 24:299–308
Yang JF, Scholz JP (2005) Learning a throwing task is associated with differential changes in the use of motor abundance. Exp Brain Res 163:137–158
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ranganathan, R., Newell, K.M. Motor synergies: feedback and error compensation within and between trials. Exp Brain Res 186, 561–570 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1259-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1259-7