Abstract
Recently there has been growing interest in the role that motion might play in the perception and representation of facial identity. Most studies have considered old/new recognition as a task. However, especially for non-rigid motion, these studies have often produced contradictory results. Here, we used a delayed visual search paradigm to explore how learning is affected by non-rigid facial motion. In the current studies we trained observers on two frontal view faces, one moving non-rigidly, the other a static picture. After a delay, observers were asked to identify the targets in static search arrays containing 2, 4 or 6 faces. On a given trial target and distractor faces could be shown in one of five viewpoints, frontal, 22° or 45° to the left or right. We found that familiarizing observers with dynamic faces led to a constant reaction time advantage across all setsizes and viewpoints compared to static familiarization. This suggests that non-rigid motion affects identity decisions even across extended periods of time and changes in viewpoint. Furthermore, it seems as if such effects may be difficult to observe using more traditional old/new recognition tasks.
References
Amaya K, Bruderlin A, Calvert T (1996) Emotion from motion. GI ‘96 online papers (http://www.graphicsinterface.org/proceedings/1996/ABC/)
Bassili JN (1978) Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 4:373–379
Bonner L, Burton AM, Bruce V (2003) Getting to know you: how we learn new faces. Visual Cognit 10:527–536
Brainard D (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433–436
Bruce V (1982) Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. Br J Psychol 73:105–116
Bruce V (1999) Complexities of face perception and categorisation. Behav Brain Sci 22:369
Bruce V, Young A (1986) Understanding face recognition. Br J Psychol 77:305–327
Bruce V, Henderson Z, Greenwood K, Hancock PJB, Burton AM, Miller P (1999) Verification of face identities from images captured on video. J Exp Psychol A 5:339–360
Campbell R, Brooks B, de Haan E, Roberts T (1996) Dissociating face processing skills: decision about lip-read speech, expression, and identity. Q J Exp Psychol A 49:295–314
Cavanagh P, Labianca A,Thornton IM (2001) Attention-based visual routines: sprites. Cognition 80:47–60
Christie F, Bruce V (1998) The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces. Mem Cognit 26:780–790
Cunningham DW, Breidt M, Kleiner M, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2003) How believable are real faces: towards a perceptual basis for conversational animation. Computer Animation and Social Agents 2003, 23–39
Duncan J, Humphreys GW (1989) Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol Rev 96:433–458
Eastwood JD, Smilek D, Merikle PM (2001) Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Percept Psychophys 63:1004–1013
Eastwood JD, Smilek D, Merikle PM (2003) Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance. Percept Psychophys 65:352–358
Ellis HD, Shepherd JW, Davies GM (1979) Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception 8:431–439
Enns JT, Rensink RA (1990)Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science 9:721–723
Freyd JJ (1987) Dynamic mental representations. Psychol Rev 94:427–438
Freyd J (1993) Five hunches about perceptual processes and dynamic representations. In: Meyer D, Kornblum S (eds) Attention and performance XIV: synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 99–119
Freyd JJ, Finke RA (1984) Facilitation of length discrimination using real and imaged context frames. Am J Psychol 97:323–341
Freyd JJ, Johnson JQ (1987) Probing the time course of representational momentum. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 13:259–268
Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI (2000) The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci 4:223–233
Hill H, Johnston A (2001) Categorizing sex and identity from the biological motion of faces. Curr Biol 11:880–887
Hill H, Schyns PG, Akamatsu S (1997) Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition. Cognition 62:201–222
Kamachi M, Bruce V, Mukaida S, Gyoba J, Yoshikawa S, Akamatsu S (2001) Dynamic properties influence the perception of facial expressions. Perception 30:875–887
Kleiner M, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2003)”The MPI VideoLab.” Technical report 104. Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
Knappmeyer B, Thornton IM, Bülthoff HH (2003) Facial motion biases the perception of facial form. Vision Res 43:1921–1936
Knight B, Johnson A (1997) The role of movement in face recognition. Vis Cogn 4:265–273
Kourtzi Z, Nakayama K (2001) Dissociable signatures of processing for moving and static objects. Vis Cogn 9:248–264
Lander K, Bruce V (2000) Recognizing famous faces: Exploring the benefits of facial motion. Ecol Psychol 12:259–272
Lander K, Bruce V (2003) The role of motion in learning new faces. Vis Cogn 10:897–921
Lander K, Chuang L (2005) Why are moving faces easier to recognize? Vis Cog 12:429–442
Lander K, Christie F, Bruce V (1999) The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Mem Cognit 27:974–985
Liu CH, Chaudhuri A (2002) Reassessing the 3/4 view effect in face recognition. Cognition 83:31–48
Newell FN, Wallraven C, Huber S (2004) The role of characteristic motion in object categorization. J Vis 4:118–129
Nothdurft HC (1993) Faces and facial expressions do not pop out. Perception 22:1287–1298
O’Toole AJ, Roark D, Abdi H (2002) Recognizing moving faces: a psychological and neural synthesis. Trends Cogn Sci 6:261–266
Rosenblum LD, Yakel DA, Baseer N, Panchal A, Nodarse BC, Niehus RP (2002) Visual speech information for face recognition. Percept Psychophys 64:220–229
Sekular AB, Palmer SE (1992) Perception of partly occluded objects: a microgenetic analysis. J Exp Psy gen 121:95–111
Stone JV (1999) Object recognition: view-specificity and motion-specificity. Vision Res 39:4032–4044
Thornton IM, Kourtzi Z (2002) A matching advantage for dynamic faces. Perception 31:113–132
Tong F, Nakayama K (1999) Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1016–1035
Treisman AM, Gelade G (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognit Psychol 12:97–136
Troje NF, Bülthoff HH (1996) Face recognition under varying poses: the role of texture and shape. Vision Res 12:1761–1771
Vuong QC, Tarr MJ (2004) Rotation direction affects object recognition. Vision Res 44:1717–1730
Wallis G (2002) The role of object motion in forging long-term representations of objects. Vis Cogn 9:233–247
Wallis G, Bülthoff HH (2001) Effects of temporal association on recognition memory. PNAS 98:4800–4804
Watson TL, Hill HC, Johnston A, Troje N (2005) Motion as a cue for viewpoint invariance. Vis cogn (in press)
Wolfe JM (1994) Visual search in continuous, naturalistic stimuli. Vision Res 34:1187–1195
Wolfe JM (1998) Visual Search. In: Pashler H (eds) Attention. Psychology Press/Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis, England, pp 13–73
Young AW, Hay DC, Ellis AW (1985) The faces that launched a thousand slips: everyday difficulties and errors in recognizing people. Br J Psychol 76:495–523
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Martin Breidt and Mario Kleiner for helping to produce the stimuli used in these experiments. Thanks also to all of the actors who allowed us to videocapture their facial motions. We are also grateful to Quoc Vuong, Vicki Bruce and one anonymous reviewer for their valuable and thoughtful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pilz, K.S., Thornton, I.M. & Bülthoff, H.H. A search advantage for faces learned in motion. Exp Brain Res 171, 436–447 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0283-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0283-8