Skip to main content
Log in

Age-related differences in a delayed pointing of a Müller-Lyer illusion

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been suggested that movements to visible or remembered targets are differently sensitive to the Müller-Lyer (ML) illusion. Indeed, when the target is continuously visible, movements rely on the veridical object characteristics, whereas remembered movements are thought to reflect the perceived characteristics of the object. The aim of the present study was to determine how movements to visible or remembered targets are influenced by the ML illusion in children aged 7 to 11 years old. Participants were asked to make a perceptual judgment or to point a shaft extremity of the ML configurations (Closed, Control, and Open) in three visual conditions (Closed Loop, Open Loop-0-s delay, and 5-s delay). Perceptual (Perceived Length, PL) and motor (Movement Magnitude, MM, and Peak velocity, PV) variables were measured. Results showed that PL was influenced to the same extent by the ML illusion in the three visual conditions. Moreover, it appears that in subjects as young as 7 years old, the activation of the ventral system features may give rise to the perceptual illusion effect observed in all three experimental conditions. However, regardless of the subject's age, MM and PV were only sensitive in the delay condition, suggesting that delayed movements are also mediated by the ventral stream. These data suggested that the distinction between perception and motor visual pathways appears quite early during childhood (before 7 years). Our data also demonstrated that children were relying on both visual processing streams during perceptual as well as visuomotor tasks during remembered movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Donkelaar PV (1999) Pointing movements are affected by size-contrast illusions. Exp Brain Res 125:517–520

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott D, Madalena J (1987) The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. Q J Exp Psychol 39A:541–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Daprati E, Saetti MC, Toni I (1996) Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34(5):369–76

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Benuzzi F, Bertolani L, Gangitano M (2001) Visual illusions and the control of children arm movements. Neuropsychologia 39:132–139

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haffenden AM, Goodale MA (1998) The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. J Cog Neurosc 10:122–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanisch C, Konczak J, Dohle C (2001) The effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children. Exp Brain Res 137:237–245. DOI 10.1007/s002210000655

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovàcs I (2000) Human development of perceptual organization. Vis Res 40:1301–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action (Oxford Psychology Series, 27). Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Piaget J (1961) Les mécanismes perceptifs. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

  • Westwood DA, Chapman CD, Roy EA (2000a) Pantomimed actions may be controlled by the ventral visual stream. Exp Brain Res 130:545–548. DOI 10.1007/s002219900287

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westwood DA, Heath M, Roy EA (2000b) The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:456–463. DOI 10.1007/s002210000489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wraga M, Creem SH, Profitt DR (2000) Perception-action dissociations of a walkable Müller-Lyer configuration. Psychol Science 11(3):239–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the children and parents for their precious collaboration. Special thanks to Yves Rossetti (CNRS, INSERM, Lyon, France) for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Olivier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rival, C., Olivier, I., Ceyte, H. et al. Age-related differences in a delayed pointing of a Müller-Lyer illusion. Exp Brain Res 153, 378–381 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1559-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1559-5

Keywords

Navigation