Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimization of nano-emulsions production by microfluidization

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to produce an oil-in-water nano-emulsion with different compositions of the continuous and dispersed phases through microfluidization. The aqueous phase was a solution of maltodextrin with five different emulsifying ingredients including modified starch (Capsul and Hi-Cap), sodium caseinate (SC), whey protein hydrolysate (WPH), or whey protein concentrate (WPC), while the oil phase consisted of d-limonene or fish oil. Results showed that micofluidizer was capable of producing nano-emulsions (D32 as small as 150 nm) with a narrow size distribution. Generally, moderate microfluidization pressures (42–63 MPa) and cycles (1–2) were the optimum conditions beyond which, there were adverse changes in the emulsion size. For the two oils tested as the dispersed phase, fish oil emulsions had lower Sauter mean diameters (D32) but with wider size distributions than d-limonene. When different emulsifying ingredients were compared, Hi-Cap produced nano-emulsions with the narrowest distribution but highest D32 (about 600 nm). Nano-emulsions with WPC had the smallest D32 (about 200 nm) but the widest size distribution. It was found that a d-limonene volume fraction of 0.10 was the optimum dispersed-phase concentration in terms of emulsion droplet size (D32). Also, adding a surfactant (Tween 20) helped to reduce the emulsion size significantly during microfluidization, but it lead to extensive flocculation of emulsion droplets because of surfactant–biopolymer interactions and emulsifier displacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In rest of the discussion, instead of using different terms such as droplet diameter, droplet size, emulsion size, etc. which may become confusing, emulsion droplet size or simply EDS will be used.

References

  1. Becher P (2001) Emulsions: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. McClements DJ (2005) Food emulsions: principles, practice, and techniques. CRC Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu XD, Atarashi T, Furuta T, Yoshii H, Aishima S, Ohkawara M, Linko P (2001) Drying Tech 19:1361–1374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu XD, Furuta T, Yoshii H, Linko P (2000) Food Sci Technol Res 6:335–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Risch SJ, Reineccius GA (1988) ACS Symp Ser 370:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Soottitantawat A, Yoshii H, Furuta T, Ohkawara M, Linko P (2003) J Food Sci 68:2256–2262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Soottitantawat A, Bigeard F, Yoshii H, Furuta T, Ohkawara M, Linko P (2005) Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 6:107–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Windhab EJ, Dressler M, Feigl K, Fischer P, Megias-Alguacil D (2005) Chem Eng Sci 60:2101–2113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Izquierdo P, Esquena J, Tadros TF, Dederen C, Garcia MJ, Azemar N, Solans C (2002) Langmuir 18:26–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tadros T, Izquierdo R, Esquena J, Solans C (2004) Adv Colloid Interface Sci 108–09:303–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schulz MB, Daniels R (2000) Eur J Pharm Biopharm 49:231–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sonneville-Aubrun O, Simonnet J, L'Alloret F (2004) Adv Colloid Interface Sci 108–09:145–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Forgiarini A, Esquena J, Gonzalez C, Solans C (2001) Langmuir 17:2076–2083

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Seekkuarachchi IN, Tanaka K, Kumazawa H (2006) Indust Eng Chem Res 45:372–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stang M, Schuchmann H, Schubert H (2001) Eng Life Sci 1:151–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schultz S, Wagner G, Urban K, Ulrich J (2004) Chem Eng Tech 27:361–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Urban K, Wagner G, Schaffner D, Roglin D, Ulrich J (2006) Chem Eng Tech 29:24–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Olson DW, White CH, Richter RL (2004) J Dairy Sci 87:3217–3223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Microfluidics (2003) Manual of microfluidizer. Microfluidics Corp, Newton, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robin O, Blanchot V, Vuillemard JC, Paquin P (1992) Lait 72:511–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dalgleish DG, Tosh SM, West S (1996) Netherlands Milk Dairy J 50:135–148

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maa YF, Hsu CC (1999) Pharm Dev Tech 4:233–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Strawbridge KB, Ray E, Hallett FR, Tosh SM, Dalgleish DG (1995) J Colloid Interface Sci 171:392–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Robin O, Remillard N, Paquin P (1993) Colloids surfaces—physics. Eng Aspects 80:211–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Robin O, Kalab M, Britten M, Paquin P (1996) Lait 76:551–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McCrae CH (1994) J Soc Dairy Tech 47:28–31

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pinnamaneni S, Das NG, Das SK (2003) Pharmazie 58:554–558

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jafari SM, He Y, Bhandari B (2006) Int J Food Properties 9:475–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lobo L, Svereika A (2003) J Colloid Interface Sci 261:498–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Desrumaux A, Marcand J (2002) Int J Food Sci Tech 37:263–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kolb G, Viardot K, Wagner G, Ulrich J (2001) Chem Eng Tech 24:293–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Marie P, Perrier-Cornet JM, Gervais P (2002) J Food Eng 53: 43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Karbstein H, Schubert H (1995) Chem Eng Process 34:205–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Paquin P (1999) Int Dairy J 9:329–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Floury J, Desrumaux A, Axelos MAV, Legrand J (2003) J Food Eng 58:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Perrier-Cornet JM, Marie P, Gervais P (2005) J Food Eng 66:211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bouaouina H, Desrumaux A, Loisel C, Legrand J (2006) Int Dairy J 16:275–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Floury J, Desrumaux A, Legrand J (2002) J Food Sci 67:3388–3395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Narsimhan G, Goel P (2001) J Colloid Interface Sci 238:420–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Uniqema (2006) Tween Series. Uniqema International Chemical Industries

  41. Kerstens S, Murray BS, Dickinson E (2006) J Colloid Interface Sci 296:332–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Trubiano PC, Lacourse NL (1988) In: Reineccius GA, Risch S (eds) Flavor encapsulation. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 45–54

  43. Tesch S, Gerhards C, Schubert H (2002) J Food Eng 54:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dickinson E (2003) Food Hydrocolloids 17:25–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Klinkesorn U, Sophanodora P, Chinachoti P, McClements DJ (2004) Food Res Int 37:851–859

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Pugnaloni LA, Dickinson E, Ettelaie R, Mackie AR, Wilde PJ (2004) Adv Colloid Interface Sci 107:27–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Arboleya JC, Wilde PJ (2005) Food Hydrocolloids 19:485–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. McClements DJ (2004) Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 9:305–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhesh Bhandari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jafari, S.M., He, Y. & Bhandari, B. Optimization of nano-emulsions production by microfluidization. Eur Food Res Technol 225, 733–741 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0476-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0476-9

Keywords

Navigation