Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of cultivation area and year on proximate composition and antinutrients in three different kabuli-type chickpea (Cicer arientinum) varieties

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three different varieties of kabuli-type chickpeas were cultivated in three different cultivation areas and for two years. An evaluation was carried out to see the effect of year, of variety and cultivation area on the nutritional value of chickpeas i.e. the proximate composition, the sugars (starch, non-starch polysaccharides, rafinose series oligosaccharides and sucrose) and tannins and phytic acid contents. The cultivation area, the cultivation year and the plant variety, as well as their interactions significantly affect the composition and the sugars contents in chickpea. High proportion of the total variation for all studied parameters explained by the main effects of variety indicates a significant heritability for them. Cultivation area was found to have a significant effect on starch contents, RSO, tannins and phytic acid. Year was found to affect fat contents, NSP and sucrose contents. Rainfall is the climate characteristic that may be responsible for these year-dependent differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rincon F, Martinez B, Ibanez MV (1998) J Sci Food Agric 78:382–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Duhan A, Mal-Chauhan B, Darshan P, Kapoor AC (1989) J Sci Food Agric 49(4):449–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Estevez AM, Castillo E, Figuerola F, Yanez E (1991) Plant Foods Hum Nutr 41(3):193–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Attia RS, El-Tabey-Shehata AM, Aman ME, Hamza MA (1994) Food Chem 50(2):125–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reyes Moreno C, Romero-Urias C, Milan-Carrillo J, Valdez-Torres B, Zarate-Marquez E (2000) Plant Foods Hum Nutr 55(3):219–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reyes Moreno C, Milan-Carrillo J, Amienta Rodelo E, Okamura-Esparza J (2000) Food Sci Technol Int 6(6):473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Adawy TA (2002) Plant Foods Hum Nutr 57(1):83–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reyez-Moreno C, Cuevas-Rodriguez EO, Milan-Carrillo J, Cardenas-Valenzuela OG, Barron-Hoyos J (2004) J Sci Food Agric 84(3):271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaur M, Singh N (2005) Food Chem 91:403–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coskuner Y, Karababa E (2003) Int J Food Sci Technol 38:751–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. AOAC (1998) Official methods of analysis of AOAC international., 16th edn. CD-ROM 3rd revision

  12. McCleary BV, Gibson TS, Mugford DC (1992) J AOAC 80:571–579

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anonymous (1995) Raffinose series oligosachcharides assay procedure for the measurement of rafinose–series oligosaccharides sucrose and glucose in seed materials, RSO 10/95. www.megazyme.com

  14. Englyst HN, Quigley ME, Hudson GJ (1994) Analyst 119:1497–1507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rubio LA, Grant G, Dewey P, Brown D, Annand M, Bardocz S, Pusztai A (1998) J Nutr 128(6):1042–1047

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Budini R, Tonelli D, Girotti S (1980) J Agric Food Chem 28:1236–1238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grahsm HD (1992) J Agric Food Chem 40:801–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Perez Maldonado RA, Mannion PF, Farrell DJ (1999) Br Poult Sci 40:667–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Saini HS, Knights EJ (1984) J Agric Food Chem 32:940–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rehman ZU, Shah WH (2005) Food Chem 91:327–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Farrell DJ, Mannion PF (1997) Final report to Rural Industry RAD Council Egg Industry and Chicken Meat Programs. www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/CME/DAQ-28E.doc

  22. Rao PU, Belavady BJ (1978) J Agric Food Chem 26:316–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gil J, Nadal S, Luna D, Moreno MT, De Haro A (1996) J Agric Food Chem 71:179–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sosulski FW, Gadan HM (1988) J Am Oil Chem Soc 65:369–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Oluwatosin OB (1999) J Sci Food Agric 79:265–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Karaki GN, Ereifej KI (1999) J Agron Crop Sci 182:279–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh KB, Williams PC, Nakkoul H (1990) J Sci Food Agric 53:429–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu Z, Cheng F, Zhang G (2005) Food Chem 89:49–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kriton Grigorakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nikolopoulou, D., Grigorakis, K., Stasini, M. et al. Effects of cultivation area and year on proximate composition and antinutrients in three different kabuli-type chickpea (Cicer arientinum) varieties. Eur Food Res Technol 223, 737–741 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0261-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-006-0261-9

Keywords

Navigation