Skip to main content
Log in

Adsorptive preconcentration integrated with colorimetry for ultra-sensitive detection of lead and copper

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work proposes a novel detection method for the ultra-sensitive colorimetric determination of lead and copper in complex water matrix. The method integrates signal amplification with analytical sensing, achieved by adsorptive preconcentration and a colorimetric assay. We report for the first time a strategic application of batch adsorption as a preconcentration method and colorimetry performed directly on the adsorbent surface enriched with metal. Commercially available kaolin was used as the adsorbent to preconcentrate the metals. The colorimetric detection of Pb and Cu was achieved using sodium rhodizonate and bathocuproine salt as chromogenic indicators, respectively. This method eliminates the involvement of complex instrumentation and the need for new sensing material preparation. The proposed method possesses high sensitivity for both Pb and Cu under optimized conditions. A linear calibration curve is obtained in two concentration ranges, spanning 1 to 100 µg L−1 with a low detection limit of 0.6 and 1.2 µg L−1 for Pb and Cu, respectively. Further, the method enables visual detection of Pb at concentrations as low as 2.5 µg L−1 by the naked eye. We demonstrate the practical applicability of the method by simultaneous detection of Pb and Cu in six different real-water samples with good apparent recovery % [90–120%]. Detection using hand-held devices indicates the feasibility for on-site analysis. Overall, this platform method offers a high scope for de-centralized monitoring of pollutants at concentrations which are prevailing in the environment.

Graphical abstract

Integrating adsorptive preconcentration with colorimetric assay enables quantitative metal detection in environmental water sample matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UNICEF and WHO. 1 in 3 people globally do not have access to safe drinking water. Geneva: WHO News Release; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Briffa J, Sinagra E, Blundell R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon [Internet]. 2020;6(9):e04691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04691.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Seiler C, Berendonk TU. Heavy metal driven co-selection of antibiotic resistance in soil and water bodies impacted by agriculture and aquaculture. Front Microbiol. 2012;3(DEC):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, vol. 02. American Public Health Association: American Water Works Association: Water Environment Federation; 2002. p. 1–541.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ding R, Cheong YH, Ahamed A, Lisak G. Heavy metals detection with paper-based electrochemical sensors. Anal Chem. 2021;93(4):1880–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu J, Hu Q, Qi L, Lin JM, Yu L. Liquid crystal-based sensing platform for detection of Pb2+ assisted by DNAzyme and rolling circle amplification. J Hazard Mater. 2020;400(123218):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sener G, Denizli A. Identification of several toxic metal ions using a colorimetric sensor array. In: Fitzgerald EJ, Fenniri H, editors. Biomimetic sensing: methods and protocols. Springer Nature; 2019. p. 81–6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dai C, Qian HL, Yan XP. Facile room temperature synthesis of ultra-small sized porous organic cages for fluorescent sensing of copper ion in aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater [Internet]. 2021;416(January):125860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125860.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalmieda J, Kruse P. Metal cation detection in drinking water. Sensors (Switzerland). 2019;19(5134):1–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang Y, Noviana E, Nguyen MP, Geiss BJ, Dandy DS, Henry CS. Paper-based microfluidic devices: emerging themes and applications. Anal Chem. 2017;89(1):71–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yan Z, Yuan H, Zhao Q, Xing L, Zheng X, Wang W, et al. Recent development of nanoenzyme-based colorimetric sensors for heavy metal detection and the interaction mechanism. Analyst. 2020;1106:115–25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu B, Zhuang J, Wei G. Recent advances in the design of colorimetric sensors for environmental monitoring. Environ Sci Nano. 2020;7(8):2195–213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lace A, Cleary J. A review of microfluidic detection strategies for heavy metals in water. Chemosensors. 2021;9(60):1–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yarur F, Macairan JR, Naccache R. Ratiometric detection of heavy metal ions using fluorescent carbon dots. Environ Sci Nano. 2019;6(4):1121–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Meredith NA, Quinn C, Cate DM, Reilly TH, Volckens J, Henry CS. Paper-based analytical devices for environmental analysis. Analyst. 2016;141(6):1874–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nouri N, Khorram P, Duman O, Sibel T, Hassan S. Overview of nanosorbents used in solid phase extraction techniques for the monitoring of emerging organic contaminants in water and wastewater samples. Trends Environ Anal Chem. 2020;25(e0081):1–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Arena MP, Porter MD, Fritz JS. Rapid, low level determination of silver(I) in drinking water by colorimetric-solid-phase extraction. Anal Chim Acta. 2003;482(2):197–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fritz JS, Arena MP, Steiner SA, Porter MD. Rapid determination of ions by combined solid-phase extraction-diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. J Chromatogr A. 2003;997(1–2):41–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gazda DB, Fritz JS, Porter MD. Determination of nickel(II) as the nickel dimethylglyoxime complex using colorimetric solid phase extraction. Anal Chim Acta. 2004;508(1):53–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gazda DB, Fritz JS, Porter MD. Multiplexed colorimetric solid-phase extraction: determination of silver(I), nickel(II), and sample pH. Anal Chem. 2004;76(16):4881–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dias NC, Porter MD, Fritz JS. Principles and applications of colorimetric solid-phase extraction with negligible depletion. Anal Chim Acta. 2006;558(1–2):230–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bradley MM, Siperko LM, Porter MD. Colorimetric-solid phase extraction method for trace level determination of arsenite in water. Talanta [Internet]. 2011;86(1):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2011.08.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Feng L, Zhang Y, Wen L, Chen L, Shen Z, Guan Y. Colorimetric filtrations of metal chelate precipitations for the quantitative determination of nickel(II) and lead(II). Analyst. 2011;136(20):4197–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Feigl F, Suter HA. Analytical use of sodium rhodizonate. Ind Eng Chem - Anal Ed. 1942;14(10):840–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bartsch MR, Kobus HJ, Wainwright KP. Update on the use of the sodium rhodizonate test for the detection of lead originating from firearm discharges. J Forensic Sci. 1996;41(6):1046–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Campos C, Guzman R, Lopez-Fernandez E, Casado A. Evaluation of the copper-II reduction assay using bathocuproinedisulfonic acid disodium salt for the total antioxidant capacity assessment: the CUPRAC-BCS assay. Anal Biochem. 2009;392:37–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gu X, Evans LJ. Surface complexation modelling of Cd(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) adsorption onto kaolinite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2008;72(2):267–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu J, Sandaklie-Nikolova L, Wang X, Miller JD. Surface force measurements at kaolinite edge surfaces using atomic force microscopy. J Colloid Interface Sci [Internet]. 2014;420:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.12.053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Burns DT, Danzer K, Townshend A. Use of the terms “recovery” and “apparent recovery” in analytical procedures (IUPAC Recommendations 2002). Pure Appl Chem. 2002;74(11):2201–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Taverniers I, De Loose M, Van Bockstaele E. Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory. II. Analytical method validation and quality assurance. TrAC - Trends Anal Chem. 2004;23(8):535–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. AOAC Official. AOAC guidelines for single laboratory validation of chemical methods for dietary supplements and botanicals. AOAC International; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nguyen MN, Dultz S, Tran TTT, Bui ATK. Effect of anions on dispersion of a kaolinitic soil clay: a combined study of dynamic light scattering and test tube experiments. Geoderma [Internet]. 2013;209–210:209–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Adebowale KO, Unuabonah IE, Olu-Owolabi BI. Adsorption of some heavy metal ions on sulfate- and phosphate-modified kaolin. Appl Clay Sci. 2005;29(2):145–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Telliard WA. Determination of trace elements in water by preconcentration and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. U.S: Environmental Protection Agency; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bernal E. Limit of detection and limit of quantification determination in gas chromatography. IntechOpen; 2014. p. 57–81.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li JJ, Ji CH, Hou CJ, Huo DQ, Zhang SY, Luo XG, et al. High efficient adsorption and colorimetric detection of trace copper ions with a functional filter paper. Sens Actuat B Chem [Internet]. 2016;223:853–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.10.017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Satarpai T, Shiowatana J, Siripinyanond A. Paper-based analytical device for sampling, on-site preconcentration and detection of ppb lead in water. Talanta [Internet]. 2016;154:504–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.04.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Quinn CW, Cate DM, Miller-Lionberg DD, Reilly T, Volckens J, Henry CS. Solid-phase extraction coupled to a paper-based technique for trace copper detection in drinking water. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(6):3567–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ministry of Health of The People’s Republic of China. Gb 5749–2006 Standards for Drinking Water Quality. 2006. p. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Indian Standard Drinking Water Specification [Internet]. Vol. IS 10500, Bureau of Indian Standards. 2012. Available from: http://cgwb.gov.in/Documents/WQ-standards.pdf.

  41. Canada H. Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality Summary Table Prepared by the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water of the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Health and the Environment March 2006. Environments. 2012;2014:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  42. DIRECTIVE (EU), on the quality of water intended for human consumption [Internet]. Vol. L 435, Official Journal of the European Communities. 2020. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2020/2184/oj.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, National Environment Research Council (NERC), and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (ESPRC) through the Indo-UK water quality research program (Grant: DST/TM/INDO-UK/2K17/46). The authors, R.S., M.M., and P.M., thank Rajesh Ghosh and Dr. G. Saranya from the Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT-Madras, for their assistance with the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.S. conceptualized and designed the experiments. R.S., P.M., and M.M. performed the experiments. R.S., T.R., and S.P. analyzed the results. T.R. and S.P. supervised the entire work and involved in funding acquisition. R.S. drafted original manuscript. T.R. and S.P. reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Pushpavanam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

216_2022_4056_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2374 KB) Data showing the effect of contact time for adsorptive preconcentration and metal detection; Effect of NaRh exposure to ambient air during Pb detection; Colour development in the adsorbent layer with respect to BCDS concentration for Cu detection, calibration saturation graphs, images without light illumination, and calibration graph.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Savitha, R., Mallelwar, P., Mohanraj, M. et al. Adsorptive preconcentration integrated with colorimetry for ultra-sensitive detection of lead and copper. Anal Bioanal Chem 414, 4089–4102 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04056-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04056-w

Keywords

Navigation