Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariate analysis and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS): a new approach for the spatially resolved classification of modern art materials

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ever-increasing speed of exchange of ideas, information, and culture allows contemporary art to be in constant growth, especially concerning the choice of artistic materials. Their characterization is not only crucial for the study of artistic techniques but also for research into the stability of the material and, consequently, the best preservation practices. For this aim, an analytical method should have the advantages of not requiring sample preparation, performing superficial micro-analysis, and obtaining detailed spectral information. For this study, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was employed. It was used for the identification of modern paints composed of inorganic pigments and organic binders, such as acrylics, alkyds, and styrene-acrylics. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to classify the different pure materials, above all, the polymeric binders. To distinguish the paint mixtures, whose LIBS spectral results were more complex due to the pigment/binder interaction, a statistical method recently employed in the cultural heritage field was chosen, namely, random decision forest (RDF). This methodology allows a reduction of the variance of the data, testing of different training data sets by cross-validation, an increase of the predictive power. Furthermore, for the first time, the distribution of different inorganic pigments and organic binder materials in an unknown sample was mapped and correctly classified using the developed RDF. This study represents the first approach for the classification of modern and contemporary materials using LIBS combined with two different multivariate analyses. Subsequent optimization of measurement parameters and data processing will be considered in order to extend its employment to other artistic materials and conservation treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giakoumaki A, Melessanaki K, Anglos D. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) in archaeological science - applications and prospects. Anal Bio Chem. 2007;387:749–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Melessanaki K, Mateo M, Ferrence SC, Betancourt PP, Anglos D. The application of LIBS for the analysis of archaeological ceramic and metal artifacts. Appl Surf Sci. 2002;197-198:156–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki PN. Innovative techniques for the characterization of encrustation on Pentelic marble from the Parthenon, chapter in “Cultural heritage conservation and environmental impact assessment by non-destructive testing and micro-analysis”. 2005;135–148.

  4. Corsi M, Crisoforetti G, Palleschi V, Salvetti A, Tognoni E. A fast and accurate method for the determination of precious alloys caratage by laser induced plasma spectroscopy. Eur Phys J. 2001;13:373–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grolmusová Z., Mináriková L., Rakovský J., Čermák P., Veis P., Elementar LIBS. Analysis of biological samples. Proc of Contr Papers, 2009;Part III:189–192.

  6. Colao F, Fantoni R, Lazic V, Morone A, Santagata A, Giardini A. LIBS used as a diagnostic tool during the laser cleaning of ancient marble from Mediterranean areas. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2004;79(2):213–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roy A. Artists’ pigments, vol. 2. Washington DC: National Gallery of Art; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fitzhugh E. Artists’ pigments, vol. 3. Washington DC: National Gallery of Art; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Learner T. Analysis of modern paints. The Getty Conservation Institute, 2004.

  10. Learner T. Modern paints uncovered. The Getty Conservation Institute, 2008.

  11. Sattmann R, Monch I, Krause H, Noll R, Couris S, Hatziapostolou A, et al. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for polymer identification. Appl. Spectr. 1998;52(3):456–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brech F, Cross L. Optical microemission stimulated by a ruby laser. Appl Spectr. 1962;16:59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anabitarte F, Cobo A. Lopez-Higuera J.M., Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: fundamentals, applications, and challenge, ISRN Spectroscopy, 2012.

  14. Musazzi S, Perini U. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, theory and applications. Opt Sci. 2014.

  15. Bonta M, Limbeck A. Metal analysis in polymers using tandem LA-ICP-MS/LIBS: eliminating matrix effects using multivariate calibration. J Anal At Spectrom. 2018;33:1631–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rai S, Rai AK. Characterization of organic materials by LIBS for exploration of correlation between molecular and elemental LIBS signals. AIP Adv. 2011;042103.

  17. Borgia I, Burgio LMF, Corso M, Fantoni R, Palleschi V, Salvetti A, et al. Self-calibrated quantitative elemental analysis by laser-induced plasma spectroscopy: application to pigment analysis. J Cult Herit. 2000;1:S281–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gornushkin IB, Smith BW, Nasajpour H, Winefordner JD. Identification of solid materials by correlation analysis using a microscopic laser-induced plasma spectrometer. Anal Chem. 1999;71(22):5157–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jolivet L, Leprince M, Moncayo S, Sorbier L, Lienemann C-P, Motto-Ros V. Review of the recent advances and applications of LIBS-based imaging. Spectr Acta Part B: Atom Spectr. 2019;151:41–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarmiento A, Pérez-Alonso M, Olivares M, Castro K, Martínez-Arkarazo I, Fernández LA, et al. Classification and identification of organic binding media in artworks by means of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and principal component analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;399:3601–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Unnikrishnan VK, Choudhari KS, Kulkarni SD, Nayak R, Kartha VB, Santhosh C. Analytical predictive capabilities of laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) with principal component analysis (PCA) for plastic classification. RSC Adv. 2013;3:25872–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Musumarra G, Fichera M. Chemometrics and cultural heritage. Chem Intel Lab Syst. 1998;44:363–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Anghelone M, Jembrih-Simbürger D, Schreiner M. Identification of copper phthalocyanine blue polymorphs in unaged and aged paint systems by means of micro-Raman spectroscopy and random forest. Spectr Acta Part A: Mol Biomol Spectr. 2015;149:419–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sheng L, Zhang T, Niu G, Wang K, Tang H, Duan Y, et al. Classification of iron ores by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) combined with random forest (RF). J Anal At Spectrom. 2015;30:453–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Qi J, Zhang T, Tang H, Li H. Rapid classification of archaeological ceramics via laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy coupled with random forest. Spectr Acta Part B: Atom Spectr. 2018;149:288–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tropsha A, Gramatica P, Gombar VK. The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb Sci. 2003;22:69–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Grégoire S, Boudinet M, Pelascini F, Surma F, Detalle V, Holl Y. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for polymer identification. Anal Bionanal Chem. 2011;400:3331–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hufnagl B, Steiner D, Renner E, Loder MGJ, Laforsch C, Lohninger H. A methodology for the fast identification and monitoring of microplastics in environmental samples using random decision forest classifiers. Anal Methods. 2019;11:2277–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Miziolek AW, Palleschi V, Schechter I. Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy: Cambridge University; 2006.

  31. Kroonen J, Vader D. Line interference in emission spectrographic analysis: Elsevier; 1963.

  32. AtomTrace website.

  33. Osticioli I, Mendes NFC, Nevin A, Gil Francisco PSC, Becucci M, Castellucci E. Analysis of natural and artificial ultramarine blue pigments using laser induced breakdown and pulsed Raman spectroscopy, statistical analysis and light microscopy. Spectr Acta Part A. 2009;73:525–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Harilal SS, Bindhu CV, Nampoori VPN, Vallabhan CPG. Influence of ambient gas on the temperature and density of laser produced carbon plasma. Appl Phys Lett. 1998;72:167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Harilal SS, Issac RC, Bindhu CV, Nampoori VPN, Vallabhan CPG. Optical emission studies of C2 species in laser-produced plasma from carbon. J Phys D Appl Phys. 1997;30:1703–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Parigger CG, Plemmons DH, Oks E. Balmer series H measurements in a laser-induced hydrogen plasma. Appl Opt. 2003;42:5992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gautam G, Parigger CG, Surmick DM, El Sherbini AM. Laser plasma diagnostics and self-absorption measurements of the Hβ Balmer series line. J Quant Spectr Rad Trans. 2016;170:189–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Daher C, Bellot-Gurlet L, Le Hô A, Paris C, Regert M. Advanced discriminating criteria for natural organic substances of Cultural Heritage interest: spectral decomposition and multivariate analyses of FT-Raman and FT-IR signatures. Talanta. 2013;115:540–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jeffers JNR. Two case studies in the application of principal component analysis. J R Stat Soc Series C (Appl Stat). 1967;16:225–36.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jolliffe IT. A note on the use of principal components in regression. J R Stat Soc, Ser C (Appl Stat). 1982;31:300–3.

    Google Scholar 

  41. El Haddad J, Canioni L, Bousquet B. Good practices in LIBS analysis: review and advices. Spectr Acta Part B: Atom Spectr. 2014;101:171–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Ao. Univ. Prof. Dr. Hans Lohninger (TU Wien) for the support and constructive conversations during the statistical evaluation of data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Pagnin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 131 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pagnin, L., Brunnbauer, L., Wiesinger, R. et al. Multivariate analysis and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS): a new approach for the spatially resolved classification of modern art materials. Anal Bioanal Chem 412, 3187–3198 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02574-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02574-z

Keywords

Navigation