Skip to main content
Log in

An international assessment of the metrological equivalence of higher-order measurement services for creatinine in serum

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Consultative committee for amount of substance-metrology in chemistry (CCQM)-K80 Key Comparison directly assessed the equivalence of many of the world’s higher-order value-assigned materials (HOVAMs) for creatinine in human serum. This 2009 international study compared the certified values and uncertainties of the materials using measurements made under repeatability conditions. The study evaluated 17 materials submitted by 6 national metrology institutes (NMIs). The creatinine quantity in these materials ranged from 3 mg/kg to 57 mg/kg (about 0.3 mg/dL to 6 mg/dL or 30 nmol/L to 500 nmol/L). All materials were stored and prepared according the specifications provided by the participating NMIs. Samples were processed and analyzed under repeatability conditions by one analyst using isotope-dilution liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry in two measurement campaigns. The certified values and repeatability measurements were compared using uncertainty-weighted generalized distance regression. The instrumental repeatability relative standard deviation was 1.2%. The measurement design required assessment of within-unit and between-campaign variability in addition to measurement repeatability. At a 95% level of confidence, the certified values for all 17 materials agreed to within their assigned uncertainties. CCQM-K80 demonstrated the metrological equivalence of the currently available HOVAMs for creatinine in human serum and of the creatinine measurement services provided by the participating NMIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Certain commercial materials are identified in this report to specify the experimental procedure as completely as possible. In no case does such identification imply a recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the materials are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

Abbreviations

CCQM:

Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance–Metrology in Chemistry

CENAM:

Centro Nacional de Metrología (Mexico)

CRM:

Certified reference material

GDR:

Generalized distance regression

GUM:

Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement

HOVAM:

Higher-order value-assigned material

KC:

Key comparison

KRISS:

Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (Korea)

LC:

Liquid chromatography

LC-IDMS:

Liquid chromatography-isotope dilution mass spectrometry

LGC:

Limited (UK)

LOO:

Leave one out cross-validation

NIM:

National Institute of Metrology (China)

NIST:

National Institute of Standards and Technology (USA)

NKDEP:

National Kidney Disease Education Program

NMI:

National metrology institute

OAWG:

Organic analysis working group

PBMC:

Parametric bootstrap Monte Carlo

PT:

Proficiency test

PTB:

Physikalisch–Technische Bundesanstalt (Germany)

SIM:

Selected ion monitoring

References

  1. Stokes P, O'Connor G (2003) Development of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the high-accuracy determination of creatinine in serum. J Chrom B 794:125–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Nevel L, Ornemark U, Smeyers P, Harper C, Taylor PDP (2002) IMEP-17 report to participants. Part 1 International comparability

  3. Myers GL, Miller WG, Coresh J, Fleming J, Greenberg N, Greene T et al (2006) Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the laboratory working group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program. Clin Chem 52:5–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Welch MJ, Phinney CP, Parris RM, May WE, Heo GS, Henrion A et al (2003) CCQM-K12: the determination of creatinine in serum. Metrologia 40:08005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. JCGM 100:2008 (2008) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). Sèvres, France: BIPM http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf

  6. JCGM 101:2008 (2008) Evaluation of measurement data–Supplement 1 to the GUM—Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. Sèvres, France: BIPM http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_101_2008_E.pdf

  7. Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D (2000) WinBUGS—a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput 10:325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ISO 6143:2001 (2001) Gas analysis–comparison methods for determining and checking the composition of calibration gas mixtures. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  9. van der Veen AMH, Brinkmann FNC, Arnautovic M, Besley L, Heine HJ, Estban TL et al (2007) International comparison CCQM-P41 Greenhouse gases. 2. Direct comparison of primary standard gas mixtures. Metrologia 44:08003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wielgosz RI, Esler M, Viallon J, Moussay P, Oh SH, Kim BM et al (2008) Final report on CCQM-P73: international comparison of nitrogen monoxide in nitrogen gas standards (30–70) μmol/mol. Metrologia 45:08002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Veen AMH, Chander H, Ziel PR, Wessel RM, de Leer EWB, Smeulders D et al (2010) International comparison CCQM-K54: primary standard gas mixtures of hexane in methane. Metrologia 47:08019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee J, Lee JB, Moon DM, Kim JS, van der Veen AMH, Besley L et al (2010) Final report on international key comparison CCQM-K53: oxygen in nitrogen. Metrologia 47:08005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duewer DL, Lippa K, Long S, Murphy K, Sharpless K, Sniegoski L et al (2009) Demonstrating the comparability of certified reference materials. Anal Bioanal Chem 395:155–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Duewer DL, Kowalski BR, Fasching JL (1976) Improving reliability of factor-analysis of chemical data by utilizing measured analytical uncertainty. Anal Chem 48:2002–2010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Picard RR, Cook RD (1984) Cross-validation of regression-models. J Am Stat Assoc 79:575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Finney H, Newman DJ, Thakkar H, Fell JME, Price CP (2000) Reference ranges for plasma cystatin C and creatinine measurements in premature infants, neonates, and older children. Arch Dis Child 82:71–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ceriotti F, Boyd JC, Klein G, Henny J, Queralto J, Kairisto V et al (2008) Reference intervals for serum creatinine concentrations: assessment of available data for global application. Clin Chem 54:559–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The following individuals are acknowledged for their contributions to CCQM-K80: William F. Guthrie, Reenie Parris, Karen W. Phinney, Antonio Possolo, Katherine E. Sharpless, Jolene D. Splett, Melina Pérez Urquiza, Sang-Ryoul Park, Gavin O’Connor, Xinhua Dai, Ruediger Ohlendorf, and André Henrion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johanna E. Camara.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 3.99 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camara, J.E., Lippa, K.A., Duewer, D.L. et al. An international assessment of the metrological equivalence of higher-order measurement services for creatinine in serum. Anal Bioanal Chem 403, 527–535 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-5869-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-5869-y

Keywords

Navigation