Skip to main content
Log in

Extraction and determination of chloramphenicol in feed water, milk, and honey samples using an ionic liquid/sodium citrate aqueous two-phase system coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A green, simple, non-toxic, and sensitive sample pretreatment procedure coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was developed for the analysis of chloramphenicol (CAP) that exploits an aqueous two-phase system based on imidazolium ionic liquid (1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, [Bmim]BF4) and organic salt (Na3C6H5O7) using a liquid–liquid extraction technique. The influence factors on partition behaviors of CAP were studied, including the type and amount of salts, the pH value, the volume of [Bmim]BF4, and the extraction temperature. Extraction efficiency of the CAP was found to increase with increasing temperature and the volume of [Bmim]BF4. Thermodynamic studies indicated that hydrophobic interactions were the main driving force, although electrostatic interactions and salting-out effects were also important for the transfer of the CAP. Under the optimal conditions, 90.1% of the CAP could be extracted into the ionic liquid-rich phase in a single-step extraction. This method was practical when applied to the analysis of CAP in feed water, milk, and honey samples with a linear range of 2~1,000 ng mL−1. The method yielded a limit of detection of 0.3 ng mL−1 and a limit of quantification of 1.0 ng mL−1. The recovery of CAP was 90.4–102.7% from aqueous samples of real feed water, milk, and honey samples by the proposed method. This novel process is much simpler and more environmentally friendly and is suggested to have important applications for the separation of antibiotics.

The schematic diagram of separation target molecule in ILATPS

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gikas E, Kormali P, Tsipi D, Tsarbopoulos A (2004) J Agr Food Chem 52:1025–1030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gottlieb D, Legator M (1953) Mycologia 45:507–515

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mottier P, Parisod V, Gremaud E, Guy PA, Stadler RH (2003) J Chromatogr A 994:75–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gantverg A, Shishani I, Hoffman M (2003) Anal Chim Acta 483:125–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gude T, Preiss A, Rubach K (1995) J Chromatogr B 673:197–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Singer CJ, Katz SE (1985) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 68:1037–1041

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamato S, Sugihara H, Shimada K (1990) Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 38:2290–2292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dumont V, Huet AC, Traynor I, Elliott C, Delahaut P (2006) Anal Chim Acta 567:179–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Forti AF, Campana G, Simonella A, Multari M, Scortichini G (2005) Anal Chim Acta 529:257–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Park IS, Kim DK, Adanyi N, Varadi M, Kim N (2004) Biosens Bioelectron 19:667–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Akhtar MH, Danis C, Sauve A, Barray C (1995) J Chromatogr A 696:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kubala-Drincic H, Bazulic D, Sapunar-Postruznik J, Grubelic M, Stuhne G (2003) J Agric Food Chem 51:871–875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen HX, Chen H, Ying J, Huang JL, Liao L (2009) Anal Chim Acta 632:80–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo LY, Guan M, Zhao CD, Zhang HX (2008) Anal Bioanal Chem 392:1431–1438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shibusawa Y, Takeuchi N, Sugawara K, Yanagida A, Shindo H, Ito Y (2006) J Chromatogr B 844:217–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li L, Liu F, Kong X, Su S, Li KA (2002) Anal Chim Acta 452:321–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tong AJ, Dong JJ, Li LD (1999) Anal Chim Acta 390:125–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferguson J, Baxter A, Young P, Kennedy G, Elliott C, Weigel S, Gatermann R, Ashwin H, Stead S, Sharman M (2005) Anal Chim Acta 529:109–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu H, He C, Wen D, Liu H, Liu F, Li K (2006) Anal Chim Acta 557:329–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gu Z, Glatz CE (2007) J Chromatogr B 845:38–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Su CK, Chiang BH (2006) Process Biochem 41:257–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gomes GA, Azevedo AM, Aires-Barros MR, Prazeres DMF (2009) Sep Purif Technol 65:22–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Azevedo AM, Gomes AG, Rosa PAJ, Ferreira IF, Pisco AMMO, Aires-Barros MR (2009) Sep Purif Technol 65:14–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mokhtarani B, Karimzadeh R, Amini MH, Manesh SD (2008) Biochem Eng J 38:241–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shibukawa M, Nakayama N, Hayashi T, Shibuya D, Endo Y, Kawamura S (2001) Anal Chim Acta 427:293–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Leone AM, Weatherly SC, Williams ME, Thorp HH, Murray RW (2001) J Am Chem Soc 123:218–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fukumoto K, Yoshizawa M, Ohno H (2005) J Am Chem Soc 127:2398–2399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson JL, Armstrong DW, Wei GT (2006) Anal Chem 78:2892–2902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Han X, Armstrong DW (2007) Acc Chem Res 40:1079–1086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gutowski KE, Broker GA, Willauer HD, Huddleston JG, Swatloski RP, Holbrey JD, Rogers RD (2003) J Am Chem Soc 125:6632–6633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Du Z, Yu YL, Wang JH (2007) Chem Eur J 13:2130–2137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Li CX, Han J, Wang Y, Yan YS, Xu XH, Pan JM (2009) Anal Chim Acta 653:178–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zafarani-Moattar MT, Tolouei S (2008) Calphad 32:655–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Malpiedi LP, Fernández C, Picó G, Nerli B (2008) J Chem Eng Data 53:1175–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zafarani-Moattar MT, Hamzehzadeh S (2008) J Chem Eng Data 54:833–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mena ML, Agüí L, Martinez-Ruiz P, Yáñez-Sedeño P, Reviejo AJ, Pingarrón JM (2003) Anal Bioanal Chem 376:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pei Y, Wang J, Liu L, Wu K, Zhao Y (2007) J Chem Eng Data 52:2026–2031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. European Commission (2002) Implementing council directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Regulation 2002/657/EC, 12 August. Off J Eur Commun L211:8–36

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 20777029, no. 20976074, and no. 21076098), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (no. BK2010349), and the Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (no. 200807100004)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-sheng Yan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, J., Wang, Y., Yu, Cl. et al. Extraction and determination of chloramphenicol in feed water, milk, and honey samples using an ionic liquid/sodium citrate aqueous two-phase system coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem 399, 1295–1304 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4376-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4376-2

Keywords

Navigation