Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of a novel ultra-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of retinol and α-tocopherol in human serum with conventional HPLC using monolithic and particulate columns

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Retinol and α-tocopherol are biologically active compounds often monitored in blood samples because of their evident importance in human metabolism. In this study a novel ultra-performance liquid chromatographic (UPLC) method used for determination of both vitamins in human serum has been compared with conventional HPLC with particulate and monolithic C18 columns. In UPLC a sub-two-micron particle-hybrid C18 stationary phase was used for separation, in contrast with a five-micron-particle packed column and a monolithic column with a highly porous structure. Methanol, at flow rates of 0.48, 1.5, and 2.5 mL min−1, respectively, was used as mobile phase for isocratic elution of the compounds in the three methods. Detection was performed at 325 nm and 290 nm, the absorption maxima of retinol and α-tocopherol, respectively. Analysis time, sensitivity, mobile-phase consumption, validation data, and cost were critically compared for these different chromatographic systems. Although cost and mobile-phase consumption seem to make UPLC the method of choice, use of the monolithic column resulted in almost the same separation and performance with a slightly shorter analysis time. These methods are alternatives and, in routine laboratory practice, more economical means of analysis of large numbers of biological samples than use of a traditional particulate column.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnold T, Nau H, Ruehl R (2000) In: Song WO, Beecher GR, Eitenmiller RR (eds) Modern analytical methodologies in fat- and water- soluble vitamins. Wiley, New York, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stocker P, Lesgards JF, Vidal N, Chalier F, Prost M (2003) BBA Gen Subjects 1621:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Piironen VI (2000) In: Song WO, Beecher GR, Eitenmiller RR (eds) Modern analytical methodologies in fat- and water- soluble vitamins. Wiley, New York, p 81

    Google Scholar 

  4. Granado-Lorencio F, Olmedilla-Alonso B, Herrero-Barbudo C, Blanco-Navarro I, Blázquez-García S, Pérez-Sacristán B (2006) Clin Biochem 39:180–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Urbánek L, Solichová D, Melichar B, Dvořák J, Svobodová I, Solich P (2006) Anal Chim Acta 573/574:267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sirimanne SR, Patterson DG Jr, Ma L, Justice JB Jr (1998) J Chromatogr B 716:129–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Talwar D, Ha TKK, Cooney J, Brownlee ChJ, O’Reilly DS (1998) Clin Chim Acta 270:85–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alvarez JC, De Mazancourt P (2001) J Chromatogr B 755:129–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gimeno E, Castellote AI, Lamuela-Raventós RM, de la Torre-Boronat MC, Lopéz-Sabater MC (2001) J Chromatogr B 758:315–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodríguez-Delgado MA, Díaz-Flores Estévez JF, Díaz-Flores Estévez F, Hernández Calzadilla C, Díaz Romero C (2002) J Pharm Biomed Anal 28:991–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taibi G, Nicotra CMA (2002) J Chromatogr B 780:261–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ortega H, Coperías JL, Castilla P, Goméz-Coronado D, Lasunción MA (2004) J Chromatogr B 803:249–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chatzimichalakis PF, Samanidou VF, Papadoyannis IN (2004) J Chromatogr B 805:289–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mata-Granados JM, de Castro MDL, Quesada JM (2004) J Pharm Biomed Anal 35:575–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Karpinska J, Mikoluc B, Motkowski R, Piotrowska-Jastrzebska J (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 42:232–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Casal S, Macedo B, Oliveira MBPP (2001) J Chromatogr B 763:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bustamante-Rangel M, Delgado-Zamarreno MM, Sánchez-Pérez A, Carabias-Martínez R (2006) J Chromatogr A 1125:270–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rupérez FJ, Mach M, Barbas C (2004) J Chromatogr B 800:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miyabe K, Guiochon G (2004) J Sep Sci 27:853–873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. http://www.chromolith.com, 20.12.2006

  21. Tanaka N, Motokawa M, Kobayashi H, Hosoya K, Ikegami T (2003) In: Švec F, Tennikova TB, Deyl Z (eds) Monolithic materials preparation, properties and applications, chap 8. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 173

    Google Scholar 

  22. http://www.waters.com, 6.1.2007

  23. Nováková L, Matysová L, Solich P (2006) Talanta 68:908–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson KA, Plumb R (2005) J Pharm Biomed Anal 39:805–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu K, Little D, Plumb R, Smith B (2006) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20:544–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Connor D, Mortishire-Smith R (2006) Anal Bioanal Chem 385:114–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Apollonio LG, Pianca DJ, Whittall IR, Maher WA, Kyd JM (2006) J Chromatogr B 836:111–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun X, Li X, Cai S, Quin F, Lu X, Li F (2007) J Chromatogr B 846:323–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li R, Dong L, Huang J (2005) Anal Chim Acta 546:167–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalovidouris M, Michalea S, Robola N, Koutsopoulou M, Panderi I (2006) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20:2939–2946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Al-Dirbashi OY, Aboul-Enein HY, Jacob M, Al-Qahtani K, Rashed MS (2006) Anal Bioanal Chem 385:1439–1443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) (1995) Q2A: text on validation of analytical procedures, vol 60. US FDA Federal Register, p 11260

  33. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) (1997) Q2B: validation of analytical procedures: methodology, vol 62. US FDA Federal Register, p 27463

  34. LC/GC, Separation science redefined, May 2005, p 40

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education MSM 0021620822, MZO 00179906, the Grant Agency IGA MZ NR/8048-3, and the Grant Agency of Charles University, Project No. 296/2005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Solichová.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Citová, I., Havlíková, L., Urbánek, L. et al. Comparison of a novel ultra-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of retinol and α-tocopherol in human serum with conventional HPLC using monolithic and particulate columns. Anal Bioanal Chem 388, 675–681 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1237-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1237-8

Keywords

Navigation