Abstract
Rationale: Sibutramine (Meridia) is a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor marketed for weight control. Previous studies demonstrated low abuse potential for 20 and 30 mg sibutramine (doses near the therapeutic range); however, no data existed on supratherapeutic doses. This study, therefore, examined 25 and 75 mg sibutramine in humans compared to d-amphetamine (20 mg) as a positive control and placebo as a negative control. Objectives: The study examined the acute subjective, reinforcing, and physiological effects of sibutramine to assess its abuse liability. Methods: Twelve polydrug abusers with no history of drug dependence participated in this double-blind, inpatient/outpatient study. Volunteers participated in four drug sessions, in which they completed subjective effects scales including the Profile of Mood States (POMS), Visual Analog Scales (VAS), and the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI). The Multiple Choice Procedure (MCP) was used to evaluate reinforcing efficacy. Results: Sibutramine 25 mg produced subjective effects that were indistinguishable from placebo. Sibutramine 75 mg produced significant unpleasant effects, such as Anxiety, Confusion, and decreased Vigor. On the MCP, volunteers chose to give up an average of $4.04 from their study pay rather than receive the higher dose of sibutramine again. In contrast, d-amphetamine 20 mg produced positive mood changes and was well liked. Conclusions: These data indicate sibutramine lacks amphetamine-type abuse liability when administered acutely.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 12 January 1999 / Final version: 21 July 1999
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schuh, L., Schuster, C., Hopper, J. et al. Abuse liability assessment of sibutramine, a novel weight control agent. Psychopharmacology 147, 339–346 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050001
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050001