Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expectations and placebo responses to caffeine-associated stimuli

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

To test the theory that expectations control placebo responses.

Objective

Subjects (n=20) were asked how much they expected their arousal to increase after one or two cups of coffee, and were subsequently exposed to one or two cups of decaffeinated coffee, or to caffeine equivalent to one or two cups of coffee (200 and 400 mg). The expectancy theory of placebo responses predicts a positive correlation between expectations and actual placebo responses.

Methods

Dependent variables were acoustic startle eyeblink and skin conductance responses, blood pressure and heart rate, and measures of subjective arousal.

Results

Caffeine increased startle eyeblink and skin conductance responses, as well as blood pressure and subjective arousal. Decaffeinated coffee increased startle eyeblink and skin conductance responses, but had no effect on subjective arousal, although the participants clearly expected increased subjective arousal after both one and two cups of coffee. However, there were significant correlations between the alertness expected after coffee, and the actual alertness recorded after decaffeinated coffee.

Conclusions

The main finding in this study was that relatively strong expectations about the effects of coffee did not generate placebo responses after administration of decaffeinated coffee. Expectations were dose dependent, whereas the placebo response was not. However, expected alertness after coffee predicted recorded alertness after coffee. In sum, the expectancy theory of placebo effects received only limited support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benedetti F, Amanzio M, Baldi S, Casadio C, Cavallo A, Mancuso M, Ruffini E, Oliaro A, Maggi G (1998) The specific effects of prior opioid exposure on placebo analgesia and placebo respiratory depression. Pain 75:313–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard J, Sawers SJA (1983) Comparative pharmacokinetics of caffeine in young and elderly men. J Pharmacokinet Biopharmaceut 11:109–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bond A, Lader M (1974) The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. Br J Med Psychol 47:211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaten MA (1993) A comparison of electromyographic and photoelectric techniques in the study of classical eyeblink conditioning and startle reflex modification. J Psychophysiol 7:230–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaten MA, Blumenthal TD (1999) Caffeine-associated stimuli elicit conditioned responses: an experimental model of the placebo effect. Psychopharmacology 145:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Woodson PP (1988) Caffeine physical dependence: a review of human and laboratory animal studies. Psychopharmacology 94:437–451

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles JB (1963) Conditioning and the placebo effect: the effects of decaffeinated coffee on simple reaction time in habitual coffee drinkers. Behav Res Ther 1:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane JD (1997) Effects of brief caffeinated-beverage deprivation on mood, symptoms, and psychomotor performance. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 58:203–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lienert GA (1956) Die Bedeutung der Suggestion in pharmakopsychologischen Untersuchungen. Zeit Exp Ang Psychol 4:418–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykken DT (1972) Range correction applied to heart rate and GSR data. Psychophysiology 9:373–379

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikalsen A, Bertelsen B, Flaten MA (2001) Effects of caffeine, caffeine-associated stimuli, and caffeine-related information on physiological and psychological arousal. Psychopharmacology 157:373–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery GH, Kirsch I (1997) Classical conditioning and the placebo effect. Pain 72:107–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nehlig A (1999) Are we dependent upon coffee and caffeine? A review on human and animal data. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 23:563–576

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill ST, Parrott AC (1992) Stress and arousal in sedative and stimulant cigarette smokers. Psychopharmacology 107:442–446

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips-Bute BG, Lane JD (1998) Caffeine-withdrawal symptoms following brief caffeine deprivation. Physiol Behav 63:35–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Price DD, Milling LS, Kirsch I, Duff A, Montgomery GH, Nicholls SS (1999) An analysis of factors that contribute to the magnitude of placebo analgesia in an experimental paradigm. Pain 83:147–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schicatano EJ, Blumenthal TD (1995) The effects of different doses of caffeine on habituation of the human acoustic startle reflex. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 52:231–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AW, Whitney H, Thomas M, Perry K, Brockman P (1997) Effects of caffeine and noise on mood, performance and cardiovascular functioning. Hum Psychopharmacol 12:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Walach H, Schmidt S, Dirhold T, Nosch S (2002) Effects of a caffeine placebo and suggestion on blood pressure, heart rate, well-being, and cognitive performance. Int J Psychophysiol 43:247–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a grant from the Norwegian Science Council (project no. 142540/320) to Dr. Flaten.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magne Arve Flaten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flaten, M.A., Aasli, O. & Blumenthal, T.D. Expectations and placebo responses to caffeine-associated stimuli. Psychopharmacology 169, 198–204 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1497-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1497-8

Keywords

Navigation