Abstract
The recent rapid expansion in the DNA and protein databases, arising from large-scale genomic and metagenomic sequence projects, has forced significant development in the field of phylogenetics: the study of the evolutionary relatedness of the planet’s inhabitants. Advances in phylogenetic analysis have greatly transformed our view of the landscape of evolutionary biology, transcending the view of the tree of life that has shaped evolutionary theory since Darwinian times. Indeed, modern phylogenetic analysis no longer focuses on the restricted Darwinian–Mendelian model of vertical gene transfer, but must also consider the significant degree of lateral gene transfer, which connects and shapes almost all living things. Herein, I review the major tree-building methods, their strengths, weaknesses and future prospects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson JO et al (2007) A genomic survey of the fish parasite Spironucleus salmonicida indicates genomic plasticity among diplomonads and significant lateral gene transfer in eukaryote genome evolution. BMC Genomics 8:51
Archibald JM, Rogers MB, Toop M, Ishida K, Keeling PJ (2003) Lateral gene transfer and the evolution of plastid-targeted proteins in the secondary plastid-containing alga Bigelowiella natans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:7678–7683
Brocchieri L (2001) Phylogenetic inferences from molecular sequences: review and critique. Theor Popul Biol 59:27–40
Charlebois RL, Beiko RG, Ragan MA (2003) Microbial phylogenomics: branching out. Nature 421:217
DeBry RW (1992) The consistency of several phylogeny-inference methods under varying evolutionary rates. Mol Biol Evol 9:537–551
Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Philippe H (2005) Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat Rev Genet 6:361–375
Forterre P, Gadelle D (2009) Phylogenomics of DNA topoisomerases: their origin and putative roles in the emergence of modern organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 37:679–692
Grishin NV (1999) A novel approach to phylogeny reconstruction from protein sequences. J Mol Evol 48:264–273
Gupta RS (2004) The phylogeny and signature sequences characteristics of Fibrobacteres, Chlorobi, and Bacteroidetes. Crit Rev Microbiol 30:123–143
Hernandez Fernandez M, Vrba ES (2005) A complete estimate of the phylogenetic relationships in Ruminantia: a dated species-level supertree of the extant ruminants. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 80:269–302
Hillis DM, Bull JJ, White ME, Badgett MR, Molineux IJ (1992) Experimental phylogenetics: generation of a known phylogeny. Science 255:589–592
Huelsenbeck JP, Rannala B (1997) Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science 276:227–232
Karlin S (1998) Global dinucleotide signatures and analysis of genomic heterogeneity. Curr Opin Microbiol 1:598–610
Karlin S, Bucher P, Brendel V, Altschul SF (1991) Statistical methods and insights for protein and DNA sequences. Annu Rev Biophys Chem 20:175–203
Karlin S, Zuker M, Brocchieri L (1994) Measuring residue associations in protein structures. Possible implications for protein folding. J Mol Biol 239:227–248
Lawrence JG (2002) Gene transfer in bacteria: speciation without species? Theor Popul Biol 61:449–460
Lawrence CE, Altschul SF, Boguski MS, Liu JS, Neuwald AF, Wootton JC (1993) Detecting subtle sequence signals: a Gibbs sampling strategy for multiple alignment. Science 262:208–214
Lopez P, Bapteste E (2009) Molecular phylogeny: reconstructing the forest. C R Biol 332:171–182
McCormack GP, Clewley JP (2002) The application of molecular phylogenetics to the analysis of viral genome diversity and evolution. Rev Med Virol 12:221–238
Pickett KM, Randle CP (2005) Strange bayes indeed: uniform topological priors imply non-uniform clade priors. Mol Phylogenet Evol 34:203–211
Phillips A, Janies D, Wheeler W (2000) Multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Phylogenet Evol 16:317–330
Puigbo P, Wolf Y, Koonin E (2009) Search for a ‘Tree of Life’ in the thicket of the phylogenetic forest. J Biol 8:59
Sapp J (2007) The structure of microbial evolutionary theory. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 38:780–795
Sleator RD (2010) An overview of the processes shaping protein evolution. Sci Prog 93:1–6
Sleator RD, Shortall C, Hill C (2008) Metagenomics. Lett Appl Microbiol 47:361–366
Snel B, Huynen MA, Dutilh BE (2005) Genome trees and the nature of genome evolution. Annu Rev Microbiol 59:191–209
Soltis DE, Soltis PS (2003a) The role of phylogenetics in comparative genetics. Plant Physiol 132:1790–1800
Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2003b) Applying the bootstrap in phylogeny reconstruction. Statist Sci 18:256–267
Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599
Vingron M, Waterman MS (1994) Sequence alignment and penalty choice. Review of concepts, case studies and implications. J Mol Biol 235:1–12
Wheeler D (2002) Selecting the right protein-scoring matrix. Curr Protoc Bioinform, Chap 3, Unit 35
Whelan S, Lio P, Goldman N (2001) Molecular phylogenetics: state-of-the-art methods for looking into the past. Trends Genet 17:262–272
Wrobel B (2008) Statistical measures of uncertainty for branches in phylogenetic trees inferred from molecular sequences by using model-based methods. J Appl Genet 49:49–67
Yang Z (1996) Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods. J Mol Evol 42:294–307
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sleator, R.D. Phylogenetics. Arch Microbiol 193, 235–239 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-011-0677-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-011-0677-x