Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High serum pentosidine but not esRAGE is associated with prevalent fractures in type 1 diabetes independent of bone mineral density and glycaemic control

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Fracture risk in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is supposed to be underestimated by bone mineral density (BMD). Individuals with T1D had more prevalent fractures in a cross-sectional study. Serum levels of pentosidine, an advanced glycation end product, and poor glycaemic control were associated with prevalent fractures independent of BMD.

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is associated with increased fracture risk. Bone mineral density (BMD) underestimates the risk of fractures in some individuals. The accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) impairs bone matrix and reduces bone strength.

Methods

In a cross-sectional study, 128 men and premenopausal women with T1D were evaluated. We compared traditional risk factors for fractures, BMD, parameters of bone metabolism and AGEs in individuals with and without prevalent fractures. An independent association of serum AGE levels with prevalent fractures was investigated.

Results

Individuals with prevalent fractures exhibited a longer duration of T1D, higher HbA1c and more diabetic-related complications. BMD at the femoral neck (z-score −0.76 ± 0.94 vs. −0.23 ± 1.02; p = 0.031) and total hip (z-score −0.54 ± 0.93 vs. 0.11 ± 1.11; p = 0.017) was lower in those with prevalent fractures. Individuals with fractures had higher pentosidine levels (164.1 ± 53.6 vs. 133.2 ± 40.4; p = 0.002). The levels of N-ε-(carboxymethyl)-lysine (CML) and endogenous secretory receptor for AGEs (esRAGE) did not significantly differ. Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, BMI, family history of fractures, smoking, vitamin D deficiency, BMD at lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip identified pentosidine levels and HbA1c as independent factors associated with prevalent fractures (odds ratio 1.02, 95 % CI 1.00–1.03/pmol/ml increase of pentosidine; p = 0.008 and odds ratio 1.93, 95 % CI 1.16–3.20 per percentage increase of HbA1c; p = 0.011).

Conclusions

The pentosidine levels but not BMD are independently associated with prevalent fractures. Impaired bone quality in T1D may result from increased AGE formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

T1D:

Type 1 diabetes

BMD:

Bone mineral density

HbA1c :

Glycated haemoglobin A1c

SD:

Standard deviation

AGEs:

Advanced glycation end products

CML:

N-ε-(carboxymethyl)-lysine

esRAGE:

Endogenous secretory receptor for AGEs

References

  1. Zhukouskaya VV, Eller-Vainicher C, Vadzianava VV, Shepelkevich AP, Zhurava IV, Korolenko GG, Salko OB, Cairoli E, Beck-Peccoz P, Chiodini I (2013) Prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 36:1635–1640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicodemus KK, Folsom AR (2001) Type 1 and type 2 diabetes and incident hip fractures in postmenopausal women. Diabetes Care 24:1192–1197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vestergaard P (2007) Discrepancies in bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes–a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 18:427–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Neumann T, Samann A, Lodes S et al (2011) Glycaemic control is positively associated with prevalent fractures but not with bone mineral density in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 28:872–875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Danielson KK, Elliott ME, LeCaire T, Binkley N, Palta M (2009) Poor glycemic control is associated with low BMD detected in premenopausal women with type 1 diabetes. Osteoporos Int 20:923–933

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Seeman E, Delmas PD (2006) Bone quality–the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med 354:2250–2261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Busch M, Franke S, Ruster C, Wolf G (2010) Advanced glycation end-products and the kidney. Eur J Clin Invest 40:742–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miyata T, Wada Y, Cai Z, Lida Y, Horie K, Yasuda Y, Maeda K, Kurokawa K, van Ypersele de Strihou C (1997) Implication of an increased oxidative stress in the formation of advanced glycation end products in patients with end-stage renal failure. Kidney Int 51:1170–1181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salman AG, Mansour DE, Swelem AH, Al-Zawahary WM, Radwan AA (2009) Pentosidine - a new biochemical marker in diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Res 42:96–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong XN, Qin A, Xu J, Wang X (2011) In situ accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in bone matrix and its correlation with osteoclastic bone resorption. Bone 49:174–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saito M, Marumo K (2010) Collagen cross-links as a determinant of bone quality: a possible explanation for bone fragility in aging, osteoporosis, and diabetes mellitus. Osteoporos Int 21:195–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vashishth D (2007) The role of the collagen matrix in skeletal fragility. Curr Osteoporos Rep 5:62–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alikhani M, Alikhani Z, Boyd C, MacLellan CM, Raptis M, Liu R, Pischon N, Trackman PC, Gerstenfeld L, Graves DT (2007) Advanced glycation end products stimulate osteoblast apoptosis via the MAP kinase and cytosolic apoptotic pathways. Bone 40:345–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Karim L, Tang SY, Sroga GE, Vashishth D (2013) Differences in non-enzymatic glycation and collagen cross-links between human cortical and cancellous bone. Osteoporos Int 24:2441–2447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanaka S, Kuroda T, Saito M, Shiraki M (2011) Urinary pentosidine improves risk classification using fracture risk assessment tools for postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 26:2778–2784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamamoto M, Yamaguchi T, Yamauchi M, Yano S, Sugimoto T (2008) Serum pentosidine levels are positively associated with the presence of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:1013–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwartz AV, Garnero P, Hillier TA et al (2009) Pentosidine and increased fracture risk in older adults with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:2380–2386

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kislinger T, Fu C, Huber B et al (1999) N(epsilon)-(carboxymethyl)lysine adducts of proteins are ligands for receptor for advanced glycation end products that activate cell signaling pathways and modulate gene expression. J Biol Chem 274:31740–31749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yonekura H, Yamamoto Y, Sakurai S et al (2003) Novel splice variants of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products expressed in human vascular endothelial cells and pericytes, and their putative roles in diabetes-induced vascular injury. Biochem J 370:1097–1109

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto M, Yamaguchi T, Yamauchi M, Sugimoto T (2009) Low serum level of the endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products (esRAGE) is a risk factor for prevalent vertebral fractures independent of bone mineral density in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes care 32:2263–2268

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mackey DC, Lui LY, Cawthon PM, Bauer DC, Nevitt MC, Cauley JA, Hillier TA, Lewis CE, Barrett-Connor E, Cummings SR (2007) High-trauma fractures and low bone mineral density in older women and men. JAMA 298:2381–2388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Franke S, Muller A, Sommer M, Busch M, Kientsch-Engel R, Stein G (2003) Serum levels of total homocysteine, homocysteine metabolites and of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) in patients after renal transplantation. Clin Nephrol 59:88–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun JK, Keenan HA, Cavallerano JD et al (2011) Protection from retinopathy and other complications in patients with type 1 diabetes of extreme duration: the Joslin 50-year medalist study. Diabetes Care 34:968–974

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vashishth D, Gibson GJ, Khoury JI, Schaffler MB, Kimura J, Fyhrie DP (2001) Influence of nonenzymatic glycation on biomechanical properties of cortical bone. Bone 28:195–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hein G, Weiss C, Lehmann G, Niwa T, Stein G, Franke S (2006) Advanced glycation end product modification of bone proteins and bone remodelling: hypothesis and preliminary immunohistochemical findings. Ann Rheum Dis 65:101–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hein G, Wiegand R, Lehmann G, Stein G, Franke S (2003) Advanced glycation end-products pentosidine and N epsilon-carboxymethyllysine are elevated in serum of patients with osteoporosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 42:1242–1246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Valcourt U, Merle B, Gineyts E, Viguet-Carrin S, Delmas PD, Garnero P (2007) Non-enzymatic glycation of bone collagen modifies osteoclastic activity and differentiation. J Biol Chem 282:5691–5703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Raucci A, Cugusi S, Antonelli A, Barabino SM, Monti L, Bierhaus A, Reiss K, Saftig P, Bianchi ME (2008) A soluble form of the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) is produced by proteolytic cleavage of the membrane-bound form by the sheddase a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 (ADAM10). FASEB J 22:3716–3727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miura J, Yamagishi S, Uchigata Y, Takeuchi M, Yamamoto H, Makita Z, Iwamoto Y (2003) Serum levels of non-carboxymethyllysine advanced glycation endproducts are correlated to severity of microvascular complications in patients with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat 17:16–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lapolla A, Reitano R, Baccarin L, Sartore G, Plebani M, Fedele D (2005) Pentosidine plasma levels and relation with metabolic control in diabetic patients. Horm Metab Res 37:252–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nyman JS, Even JL, Jo CH et al (2011) Increasing duration of type 1 diabetes perturbs the strength-structure relationship and increases brittleness of bone. Bone 48:733–740

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kanazawa I, Yamaguchi T, Yamamoto M, Yamauchi M, Yano S, Sugimoto T (2008) Combination of obesity with hyperglycemia is a risk factor for the presence of vertebral fractures in type 2 diabetic men. Calcif Tissue Int 83:324–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Honkanen K, Honkanen R, Heikkinen L, Kroger H, Saarikoski S (1999) Validity of self-reports of fractures in perimenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 150:511–516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by a grant of Merck Pharma GmbH, Germany.

Conflicts of interest

Thomas Neumann, Sabine Lodes, Bettina Kästner, Sybille Franke, Michael Kiehntopf, Thomas Lehmann, Ulrich Alois Müller, Gunter Wolf and Alexander Sämann declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Neumann.

Additional information

This study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neumann, T., Lodes, S., Kästner, B. et al. High serum pentosidine but not esRAGE is associated with prevalent fractures in type 1 diabetes independent of bone mineral density and glycaemic control. Osteoporos Int 25, 1527–1533 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2631-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2631-7

Keywords

Navigation