Skip to main content
Log in

Combining bone resorption markers and heel quantitative ultrasound to discriminate between fracture cases and controls

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

This nested case-control analysis of a Swiss ambulatory cohort of elderly women assessed the discriminatory power of urinary markers of bone resorption and heel quantitative ultrasound for non-vertebral fractures. The tests all discriminated between cases and controls, but combining the two strategies yielded no additional relevant information.

Introduction

Data are limited regarding the combination of bone resorption markers and heel quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) in the detection of women at risk for fracture.

Methods

In a nested case-control analysis, we studied 368 women (mean age 76.2 ± 3.2 years), 195 with low-trauma non-vertebral fractures and 173 without, matched for age, BMI, medical center, and follow-up duration, from a prospective study designed to predict fractures. Urinary total pyridinolines (PYD) and deoxypyridinolines (DPD) were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. All women underwent bone evaluations using Achilles+ and Sahara heel QUS.

Results

Areas under the receiver operating-characteristic curve (AUC) for discriminative models of the fracture group, with 95% confidence intervals, were 0.62 (0.56–0.68) and 0.59 (0.53–0.65) for PYD and DPD, and 0.64 (0.58–0.69) and 0.65 (0.59–0.71) for Achilles+ and Sahara QUS, respectively. The combination of resorption markers and QUS added no significant discriminatory information to either measurement alone with an AUC of 0.66 (0.60–0.71) for Achilles+ with PYD and 0.68 (0.62–0.73) for Sahara with PYD.

Conclusions

Urinary bone resorption markers and QUS are equally discriminatory between non-vertebral fracture patients and controls. However, the combination of bone resorption markers and QUS is not better than either test used alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Szulc P, Delmas PD (2008) Biochemical markers of bone turnover: potential use in the investigation and management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 19:1683–1704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garnero P, Delmas PD (2004) Contribution of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers to the estimation of risk of osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal women. J Musculoskelet & Neuronal Interact 4:50–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Garnero P, Hausherr E, Chapuy MC et al (1996) Markers of bone resorption predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS Prospective Study. J Bone Miner Res 11:1531–1538

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weel AEAM, Seibel MJ, Hofman A et al (1999) Which fractures are associated with high bone resorption in elderly women: the Rotterdam study. J Bone Miner Res 14([Suppl 1]):S160 Abstract 1110

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chapurlat RD, Garnero P, Breart G, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD (2000) Serum type I collagen breakdown product (serum CTX) predicts hip fracture risk in elderly women: the EPIDOS study. Bone 27:283–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Akesson K, Ljunghall S, Jonsson B et al (1995) Assessment of biochemical markers of bone metabolism in relation to the occurrence of fracture: a retrospective and prospective population–based study of women. J Bone Miner Res 10:1823–1829

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Garnero P, Sornay-Rendu E, Claustrat B, Delmas PD (2000) Biochemical markers of bone turnover, endogenous hormones and the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women: the OFELY study. J Bone Miner Res 15:1526–1536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ivaska KK, Gerdhem P, Akesson K et al (2007) Bone turnover markers and prediction of fracture: nine-year follow-up study of 1040 elderly women. J Bone Miner Res 22([Suppl 1]):S21 Abstract 1073

    Google Scholar 

  10. Melton LJ 3rd, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM, Wahner HW, Riggs BL (2003) Relative contributions of bone density, bone turnover, and clinical risk factors to long-term fracture prediction. J Bone Miner Res 18:312–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garnero P, Dargent-Molina P, Hans D et al (1998) Do markers of bone resorption add to bone mineral density and ultrasonographic heel measurement for the prediction of hip fracture in elderly women? The EPIDOS prospective study. Osteoporos Int 8:563–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM et al (1996) Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 348:511–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA et al (1997) Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of osteoporotic fractures research group. Arch intern med 157:629–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart A, Kumar V, Reid DM (2006) Long-term fracture prediction by DXA and QUS: a 10-year prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 21:413–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pluijm SM, Graafmans WC, Bouter LM, Lips P (1999) Ultrasound measurements for the prediction of osteoporotic fractures in elderly people. Osteoporos Int 9:550–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Diez-Perez A, Gonzalez-Macias J, Marin F et al (2007) Prediction of absolute risk of non-spinal fractures using clinical risk factors and heel quantitative ultrasound. Osteoporos Int 18:629–639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huopio J, Kroger H, Honkanen R, Jurvelin J, Saarikoski S, Alhava E (2004) Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women. Osteoporos Int 15:190–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Khaw KT, Reeve J, Luben R et al (2004) Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Lancet 363:197–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Krieg MA, Cornuz J, Ruffieux C et al (2006) Prediction of hip fracture risk by quantitative ultrasound in more than 7000 Swiss women > or =70 years of age: comparison of three technologically different bone ultrasound devices in the SEMOF study. J Bone Miner Res 21:1457–1463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hans D, Hartl F, Krieg MA (2003) Device-specific weighted T-score for two quantitative ultrasounds: operational propositions for the management of osteoporosis for 65 years and older women in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 14:251–258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Krieg MA, Cornuz J, Ruffieux C et al (2003) Comparison of three bone ultrasounds for the discrimination of subjects with and without osteoporotic fractures among 7562 elderly women. J Bone Miner Res 18:1261–1266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cornuz J, Krieg MA, Burckhardt P (1999) Vorstellung der Studie “Schweizerische Evaluierung des Messmethoden des Osteoporotischen Frakturrisikos” (SEMOF). Schweiz Ärzteztg 80:349–352

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cornuz J, Krieg MA, Sandini L et al (2003) Factors associated with the use of hormone replacement therapy among older women. Age Ageing 32:675–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bio-Rad (2002) Pyridinium-Crosslinks by HPLC, nouvelle calibration. Notice d′utilisation

  26. Krieg MA, Barkmann R, Gonnelli S et al (2008) Quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom 11:163–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Njeh CF, Blake GM (1999) Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound: Water-coupled. In: Njeh CF, Hans D, Fuerst T, Glueer C-C, Genant HK (eds) Quantitative ultrasound: assessment of osteoporosis and bone status. Martin Dunitz, London, pp 109–124

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cheng S, Hans D, Genant H (1999) Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound systems: Gel-coupled. In: Njeh CF, Hans D, Fuerst T, Glueer C-C, Genant HK (eds) Quantitative ultrasound: assessment of osteoporosis and bone status. Martin Dunitz, London, pp 125–144

    Google Scholar 

  29. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Robins SP, Woitge H, Hesley R, Ju J, Seyedin S, Seibel MJ (1994) Direct, enzyme-linked immunoassay for urinary deoxypyridinoline as a specific marker for measuring bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res 9:1643–1649

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Seyedin SM, Kung VT, Daniloff YN et al (1993) Immunoassay for urinary pyridinoline: the new marker of bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res 8:635–641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Colwell A, Russell RG, Eastell R (1993) Factors affecting the assay of urinary 3-hydroxy pyridinium crosslinks of collagen as markers of bone resorption. Eur J Clin Investig 23:341–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Seibel MJ (2000) Molecular markers of bone turnover: biochemical, technical and analytical aspects. Osteoporos Int 11 Suppl 6:S18–S29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gerdhem P, Ivaska KK, Alatalo SL et al (2004) Biochemical markers of bone metabolism and prediction of fracture in elderly women. J Bone Miner Res 19:386–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen JS, Seibel MJ, Zochling J et al (2006) Calcaneal ultrasound but not bone turnover predicts fractures in vitamin D deficient frail elderly at high risk of falls. Calcif Tissue Int 79:37–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gluer MG, Minne HW, Gluer CC et al (2005) Prospective identification of postmenopausal osteoporotic women at high vertebral fracture risk by radiography, bone densitometry, quantitative ultrasound, and laboratory findings: results from the PIOS study. J Clin Densitom 8:386–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Seibel MJ (2005) Biochemical markers of bone turnover: part I: biochemistry and variability. Clin Biochemist 26:97–122

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bettica P, Taylor AK, Talbot J, Moro L, Talamini R, Baylink DJ (1996) Clinical performances of galactosyl hydroxylysine, pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:542–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Del Campo MT, Gonzalez-Casaus ML, Aguado P, Bernad M, Carrera F, Martinez ME (1999) Effects of age, menopause and osteoporosis on free, peptide-bound and total pyridinium crosslink excretion. Osteoporos Int 9:449–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Heiss C, Hoesel LM, Wehr U et al (2004) Vitamin K in combination with other biochemical markers to diagnose osteoporosis. Biomarkers 9:479–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Marin F, Gonzalez-Macias J, Diez-Perez A, Palma S, Delgado-Rodriguez M (2006) Relationship between bone quantitative ultrasound and fractures: a meta-analysis. J Bone Miner Res 21:1126–1135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Njeh CF, Hans D, Li J et al (2000) Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination. Osteoporos Int 11:1051–1062

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hartl F, Tyndall A, Kraenzlin M et al (2002) Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 17:321–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. McLaren AM, Isdale AH, Whiting PH, Bird HA, Robins SP (1993) Physiological variations in the urinary excretion of pyridinium crosslinks of collagen. Br J Rheumatol 32:307–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C et al (2005) Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 16:581–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the SEMOF group which authorized us to use their database.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Nanchen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nanchen, D., Cornuz, J., Ruffieux, C. et al. Combining bone resorption markers and heel quantitative ultrasound to discriminate between fracture cases and controls. Osteoporos Int 20, 1695–1703 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0843-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0843-z

Keywords

Navigation