Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Treatment of refractory overactive bladder with OnabotulinumtoxinA vs PTNS: TROOP trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We hypothesized that patients with refractory overactive bladder (rOAB) have similar improvement with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) and OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTX).

Methods

This multicenter cohort study compared BTX and PTNS in women with rOAB. Baseline information included Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OABq) short form, Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), and voiding diary. Primary outcome was cure, defined as “very much better” or “much better” on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGII) AND a reduction in OABq symptom severity scale (SSS) ≥10 at 3 months after treatment. Assuming 80% power to detect a ten-point difference in OABq-SSS, 80 participants were required per group.

Results

A total of 150 patients were enrolled; 97 completed 3 months of therapy and were included. At baseline, BTX patients had more detrusor overactivity (70% vs 40%, p = 0.025), urgency incontinence (UUI; OABq-SSS#6 4 vs 3, p = 0.02, SSS 65 vs 56, p = 0.04), but similar health-related quality of life (HRQL 49 vs 54, p = 0.28), voids (7 vs 8, p = 0.13), and UUI episodes (2 vs 2, p = 1.0). At 3 months, cure rates were similar: BTX 50% vs PTNS 44.2% (p = 0.56). Both groups had improved SSS (−37 vs −29, p = 0.08) and HRQL (31 vs 24, p = 0.14). Patients receiving BTX had a greater improvement in urgency (ΔOABq-SSS#2–3 vs −2; p = 0.02) and UUI (ΔOABq-SSS#6–2 vs -1; p = 0.02). No characteristics were predictive of cure.

Conclusions

BTX resulted in significantly greater improvement in urgency and UUI than PTNS, but no difference in success based on PGII and OABq-SSS, which may be due to a lack of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:4–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Burgio KL, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2014;188(6 Suppl):2455–63

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang M, Jian Z, Ma Y, et al. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(12):2457-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04429-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Wooldridge LS, et al. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the long-term treatment of overactive bladder: 3-year results of the STEP study. J Urol. 2013;189:2194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Duthie JB, Vincent M, Herbison GP, et al. Botulinum toxin injections for adults with overactive bladder syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(12):CD005493.

  6. Cruz F, Nitti V. Chapter 5: clinical data in neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) and overactive bladder (OAB). Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33(Suppl 3):S26–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allergan Pharmaceuticals Highlights of prescribing information. 2013. Available from: http://www.allergan.com/assets/pdf/botox_pi.pdf.

  8. Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:98–101. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tincello D, Owen R, Slack M, Abrams K. Validation of the patient global impression scales for use in detrusor overactivity: secondary analysis of the RELAX study. BJOG. 2013;120:212–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coyne KS, Matza LS, Thompson CL, et al. Determining the importance of change in the overactive bladder questionnaire. J Urol. 2006;176:627–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Amundsen CL, Richter HE, Menefee SA, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA vs sacral neuromodulation on refractory urgency urinary incontinence in women. JAMA. 2016;316:1366–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.14617.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Visco AG, Brubaker L, Richter HE, et al. Anticholinergic therapy vs. OnabotulinumtoxinA for urgency urinary incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1803–13. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1208872.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Perez-Marrero RA, et al. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: results from the SUmiT trial. J Urol. 2010;183:1438–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Finazzi-Agrò E, Petta F, Sciobica F, et al. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation effects on detrusor overactivity incontinence are not due to a placebo effect: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. J Urol. 2010;184:2001–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Balk EM, Rofeberg VN, Adam GP, et al. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments for urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170:465. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-3227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

IUGA Uroplasty 2015 Research Grant: Drs. Cheryl Iglesia and Katelyn Smithling Kopcsay.

MedStar Washington Hospital Center Graduate Medical Education Research grant (#2014–277).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.S. Kopcsay: project development, data collection, manuscript writing; A.P. Cameron: project development, data collection, manuscript editing; R. Khavari: project development, data collection, manuscript editing; R.E. Gutman: project development, data collection, manuscript editing; T.D. Marczak: data collection, manuscript editing; P.C. Jeppson: data collection, manuscript editing; E. Tefera: data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katelyn Smithling Kopcsay.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclaimer/conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

AUGS/IUGA Joint Scientific Meeting 2019, Nashville, TN 9/25/19, USA

Patient preference question

Patient preference question

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kopcsay, K.S., Marczak, T.D., Jeppson, P.C. et al. Treatment of refractory overactive bladder with OnabotulinumtoxinA vs PTNS: TROOP trial. Int Urogynecol J 33, 851–860 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05030-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-05030-3

Keywords

Navigation