Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Preoperative urodynamic studies (UDS) are frequently performed before pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery to assess urethral and bladder function. The primary goal of this study is to examine how preoperative UDS are utilized and what value these studies have in patient treatment and/or counseling.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent prolapse surgery and had preoperative UDS between June 2010 and February 2015. Indications for UDS were classified into four categories: (1) occult stress urinary incontinence only, (2) overactive bladder symptoms, (3) mixed or insensible urinary incontinence, and (4) voiding symptoms and/or elevated post-void residual. We identified changes in management or counseling that were directly attributable to UDS results prior to surgery.
Results
Three hundred ninety-two patients underwent urodynamic testing for indications 2–4 above, and 316 met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-seven percent (180/316) had OAB symptoms (34.4% wet, 65.6% dry), 40.2% (127/316) had mixed incontinence, and 17.1% (54/316) had voiding symptoms and/or elevated PVR. A total of 3.5% (11/316) patients had alteration in their management or counseling based on the results of the UDS; 29.4% (50/170) of the women evaluated for occult SUI alone or with other symptoms demonstrated it and 41 underwent sling placement.
Conclusions
UDS did not have a significant impact on preoperative management or counseling in POP surgery if demonstration of occult SUI was not the indication for preoperative study in women committed to POP surgery. Major alterations in treatment were rare and occurred mostly in women with stress incontinence that also had concomitant voiding symptoms and/or elevated PVR.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Serati M, Giarenis I, Meschia M, et al. Role of urodynamics before prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(2):165–8.
Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(21):1987–97.
van Leijsen SA, Kluivers KB, Mol BW, et al. Value of urodynamics before stress urinary incontinence surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(5):999–1008.
Rachaneni S, Latthe P. Does preoperative urodynamics improve outcomes for women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2015;122(1):8–16.
van der Ploeg JM, Zwolsman SE, Posthuma S, et al. The predictive value of demonstrable stress incontinence during basic office evaluation and urodynamics in women without symptomatic urinary incontinence undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(3):1011–8.
Winters JC, Dmochowski RR, Goldman HB, et al. Urodynamic studies in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2012;188(6 Suppl):2464–72.
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, editors. Incontinence 6th Edition. ICI-ICS. International Continence Society, Bristol, ISBN: 978–0956960733; 2017.
Whiteside JL. Making sense of urodynamic studies for women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a urogynecology perspective. Urol Clin N Am. 2012;39(3):257–63.
Hwang SM, de Toledo LGM, da Silva Carramao S, et al. Is urodynamics necessary to identify occult stress urinary incontinence? World J Urol. 2019;37(1):189–93.
Ballert KN. Urodynamics in pelvic organ prolapse: when are they helpful and how do we use them? Urol Clin N Am. 2014;41(3):409–17.
Drain A, Khan A, Ohmann EL, et al. Use of concomitant stress incontinence surgery at time of pelvic organ prolapse surgery since release of the 2011 notification on serious complications associated with transvaginal mesh. J Urol. 2017;197(4):1092–8.
Lemack GE. Use of urodynamics prior to surgery for urinary incontinence: how helpful is preoperative testing? Indian J Urol. 2007;23(2):142–7.
Asfour V, Gargasole C, Fernando R, et al. Urodynamics are necessary for patients with asymptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(8):2841–6.
Huang L, He L, Wu SL, et al. Impact of preoperative urodynamic testing for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse on clinical management in Chinese women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42(1):72–6.
Dain L, Auslander R, Rosen T, et al. Urodynamic findings in women with pelvic organ prolapse and obstructive voiding symptoms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;111(2):119–21.
Dillon BE, Lee D, Lemack GE. Urodynamics: role in incontinence and prolapse: a urology perspective. Urol Clin N Am. 2012;39(3):265–72.
Frigerio M, Manodoro S, Cola A, et al. Detrusor underactivity in pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(8):1111–6.
Sierra T, Sullivan G, Leung K, Flynn M. The negative predictive value of preoperative urodynamics for stress urinary incontinence following prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(7):1119–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-03864-y.
Adelowo A, Dessie S, Rosenblatt PL. The role of preoperative urodynamics in urogynecologic procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(2):217–22.
Abdullah B, Nomura J, Moriyama S, et al. Clinical and urodynamic assessment in patients with pelvic organ prolapse before and after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(10):1543–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glass, D., Lin, F.C., Khan, A.A. et al. Impact of preoperative urodynamics on women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 31, 1663–1668 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04084-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04084-8