Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
This study was designed to estimate the prevalence of urinary incontinence and its associated risk factors among women in northern Mexico. The type and severity of incontinence were also assessed.
Methods
This cross-sectional population-based study assessed self-reported urinary incontinence in a random sample of 1,307 women aged 25–54 years. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association of urinary incontinence with sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics and other medical conditions.
Results
Overall, 18.4% of participants reported having involuntary loss of urine at some time within the last 12 months (95% CI, 16.4–20.7%). Among women reporting urinary incontinence, stress incontinence was the most common form (56.8%), followed by mixed (31.1%) and urge incontinence (10.0%). Approximately half of the women with urinary incontinence symptoms reported a severity index of moderate (25.8%) to severe (26.2%), with 30% stating that their leakage was extremely bothersome. Forty percent of incontinent women reported use of some sort of protection, although only 28% had ever talked to a physician about their symptoms. In adjusted analyses, high body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2, chronic urinary tract infections, and a history of a hysterectomy or uterine leiomyomata were associated with increased odds of reporting incontinence symptoms. Increased odds of reporting severe urinary incontinence was associated with chronic urinary tract infections, current smoking and high BMI.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that there might be a need to develop a culturally sensitive screening questionnaire in order to identify and counsel women with mild incontinence symptoms in the primary care setting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nihira MA, Henderson N (2003) Epidemiology of urinary incontinence in women. Curr Womens Health Rep 3:340–347
Fultz NH, Burgio K, Diokno AC, Kinchen KS, Obenchain R, Bump RC (2003) Burden of stress urinary incontinence for community-dwelling women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1275–1282
Shaw C (2001) A review of the psychosocial predictors of help-seeking behaviour and impact on quality of life in people with urinary incontinence. J Clin Nurs 10:15–24
Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S (2000) A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trondelag. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1150–1157
Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S (2004) The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Int 93:324–330
Espino DV, Palmer RF, Miles TP, Mouton CP, Lichtenstein MJ, Markides KP (2003) Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence in elderly Mexican-American women. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:1580–1586
Sampselle CM, Harlow SD, Skurnick J, Brubaker L, Bondarenko I (2002) Urinary incontinence predictors and life impact in ethnically diverse perimenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 100:1230–1238
Thom DH, van den Eeden SK, Ragins AI, Wassel-Fyr C, Vittinghof E, Subak LL, Brown JS (2006) Differences in prevalence of urinary incontinence by race/ethnicity. J Urol 175:259–264
Waetjen LE, Liao S, Johnson WO, Sampselle CM, Sternfield B, Harlow SD, Gold EB (2007) Factors associated with prevalent and incident urinary incontinence in a cohort of midlife women. Am J Epidemiol 165:309–318
Walker GJ, Gunasekera P (2011) Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in developing countries: review of prevalence and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J 22:127–135
Rodriguez-Colorado S, Alvarez-Mercado RL, Escobar-del Barco L, Castillo-Ramirez M, Kunhardt-Rasch J (1996) Clinical characteristics of women with genital prolapse. Ginecol Obstet Mex 64:356–358
Velázquez Magaña M, Bustos López HH, Rojas Poceros G, Oviedo Ortega G, Neri Ruz E, Sánchez Castillo C (2007) Prevalence and quality of life in women with urinary incontinence. Study in open population. Ginecol Obstet Mex 75:347–356
Gorbea-Chavez V, Navarro-Salomón K, Escobar del Barco L, Rodríguez Colorado S (2011) Prevalence of urinary incontinence in pregnant women with prenatal care at the National Institute of Perinatology Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes. Ginecol Obstet Mex 79:527–532
Martinez Espinoza CJ, Flores Carreras O, de Alba G, Garcia JE, Velazquez Castellanos PI, Gonzalez Ruiz MI, Marquez Allegre R (2006) Prevalence of urinary and anal incontinence in women from metropolitan area of Guadalajara. Ginecol Obstet Mex 74:300–305
INEGI (2005) Second population count 2005. Basic tabulation. National Institute of Statistics and Geography, Aguascalientes, México
Secretaría de Salud (2007) National Program of Health 2007–2012. Secretaría de Salud, México, p 74
INSP (2007) National Survey of Health and Nutrition 2006 -Sonora Results. Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, INSP, Mexico, 113
García-Pérez H, Harlow SD, Erdman CA, Denman C (2010) Pelvic pain and associated characteristics among women in northern Mexico. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Heal 36:90–98
Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Seim A, Hermstad R, Vanvik A, Bratt H (1993) Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey. J Epidemiol Community Health 47:497–499
Haylen B, de Ridder D, Freeman R, Swift S, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk D, Sand P, Shaer G (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21:2–26
Sandvik H, Seim A, Vanvik A, Hunskaar S (2000) A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence: comparison with 48-hour pad-weighing tests. Neurourol Urodyn 19:137–145
Comisión Nacional de los Salarios Mínimos (2004) Salarios Mínimos 2005. Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público, Mexico, p 15
Samuelsson E, Victor A, Tibblin G (1997) A population study of urinary incontinence and nocturia among women aged 20–59 years. Prevalence, well-being and wish for treatment. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76:74–80
Longworth J, Davila Y, Sampselle CM (2003) “La Pérdida de Orina”: Hispanic women’s experience of urinary incontinence. Hisp Health Care Int 2:13–21
Voelker R (1998) International group seeks to dispel incontinence “taboo”. JAMA 280:951–953
Denman CA (2008) Mujeres, maquila y embarazo. Prácticas de atención de madres-trabajadoras en Nogales, Sonora, México. El Colegio de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico
INEGI (2010) Women and men in Mexico 2010. National Institute of Statistics and Geography, Aguascalientes, Mexico, p 133
Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S (2003) Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med 348:900–907
INMUJER (2009) Fecundidad y preferencias reproductivas en las mujeres indígenas mexicanas. Instituto Nacional de la Mujer, Gobierno Federal, Mexico. D.F, p 24
INSP (2007) National Survey of Health and Nutrition 2006. National Institute of Public Health, Mexico, p 128
Harrison GL, Memel DS (1994) Urinary incontinence in women: its prevalence and its management in a health promotion clinic. Br J Gen Pract 44:149–152
Brown JS, Sawaya G, Thom DH, Grady D (2000) Hysterectomy and urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Lancet 356:535–539
Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hunskaar S (2003) Are smoking and other lifestyle factors associated with female urinary incontinence? The Norwegian EPINCONT Study. BJOG 110:247–254
Mommsen S, Foldspang A (1994) Body mass index and adult female urinary incontinence. World J Urol 12:319–322
Rekers H, Drogendijk AC, Valkenburg HA, Riphagen F (1992) The menopause, urinary incontinence and other symptoms of the genito-urinary tract. Maturitas 15:101–111
Secretaria de Salud (2008) Detección, diagnóstico y tratamiento inicial de incontinencia urinaria en la mujer Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud, p 44
Funding
This article is based on research supported by grant D43 TW01276 from the National Institutes of Health/Fogarty International Center and grant 1000–1241 from the Ford Foundation.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Drs Hilda García-Pérez and Siobán D. Harlow are responsible for the design and data analysis reported in this article, as well as most of the writing. Drs Sampselle and Denman reviewed and provided feedback during the preparation of the final paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
García-Pérez, H., Harlow, S.D., Sampselle, C.M. et al. Measuring urinary incontinence in a population of women in northern Mexico: prevalence and severity. Int Urogynecol J 24, 847–854 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1949-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1949-y