Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The relationship between anthropometric measurements and the bony pelvis in African American and European American women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The bony pelvis anatomy is highly variable. This study aims to examine the relationship between anthropometric measurements and the size of the adult female bony pelvis.

Methods

Three-dimensional points of all pertinent landmarks of 96 adult female bony pelvises were obtained and the true conjugate, interspinous distance, intertuberous distance, and pelvic inlet and outlet areas were calculated. The relationship between these measurements and height and multiple anthropometric measurements were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r).

Results

Multiple anthropometric measurements were significantly correlated with the true conjugate and pelvic inlet and outlet areas, but not with the interspinous or intertuberous widths. Height had a greater correlation with pelvic areas than any other anthropometric measure considered, even after controlling for race. There were no significant differences in pelvic areas between races.

Conclusions

Height and other anthropometric measurements were significantly correlated with the true conjugate and pelvic inlet and outlet areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caldwell WE, Moloy HC (1933) Anatomical variations in the female pelvis and their effect in labor with a suggested classification. 58th Annual Meeting of the American Gynecological Society, pp 479–505

  2. Mahmood TA, Campbell DM, Wilson AW (1988) Maternal height, shoe size, and outcome of labour in white primigravidas: a prospective anthropometric study. BMJ 297:515–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rozenholc AT, Ako SN, Leke RJ, Boulvain M (2007) The diagnostic accuracy of external pelvimetry and maternal height to predict dystocia in nulliparous women: a study in Cameroon. BJOG 114:630–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Bogaert LJ (1999) The relation between height, foot length, pelvic adequacy and mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 82:195–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sze EH, Kohli N, Miklos JR, Roat T, Karram MM (1999) Computed tomography comparison of bony pelvis dimensions between women with and without genital prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 93:229–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Handa VL, Pannu HK, Siddique S, Gutman R, VanRooyen J, Cundiff G (2003) Architectural differences in the bony pelvis of women with and without pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol 102:1283–1290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mattox TF, Lucente V, McIntyre P, Miklos JR, Tomezsko J (2000) Abnormal spinal curvature and its relationship to pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1381–1384, discussion 1384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen JK, Lind LR, Choe JY, McKindsey F, Sinow R, Bhatia NN (2000) Lumbosacral spine and pelvic inlet changes associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 95:332–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baragi RV, Delancey JO, Caspari R, Howard DH, Ashton-Miller JA (2002) Differences in pelvic floor area between African American and European American women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:111–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wurdinger S, Humbsch K, Reichenbach JR, Peiker G, Seewald HJ, Kaiser WA (2002) MRI of the pelvic ring joints postpartum: normal and pathological findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:324–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH (1994) Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History (Arkansas Archeological Report Research Series), Arkansas Archeological Survey

  12. Cupples LA, Heeren T, Schatzkin A, Colton T (1984) Multiple testing of hypotheses in comparing two groups. Ann Intern Med 100:122–129

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Awonuga AO, Merhi Z, Awonuga MT, Samuels TA, Waller J, Pring D (2007) Anthropometric measurements in the diagnosis of pelvic size: an analysis of maternal height and shoe size and computed tomography pelvimetric data. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:523–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rizk DE, Czechowski J, Ekelund L (2004) Dynamic assessment of pelvic floor and bony pelvis morphologic condition with the use of magnetic resonance imaging in a multiethnic, nulliparous, and healthy female population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:83–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are extremely appreciative of Lyman A. Jellema, MA, Bruce Latimer, Ph.D., and the Cleveland Museum of Natural History for their unwavering assistance and support of this investigation.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk A81, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA

    Beri Ridgeway, Beatriz E. Arias & Matthew D. Barber

Authors
  1. Beri Ridgeway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beatriz E. Arias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew D. Barber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beri Ridgeway.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ridgeway, B., Arias, B.E. & Barber, M.D. The relationship between anthropometric measurements and the bony pelvis in African American and European American women. Int Urogynecol J 22, 1019–1024 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1416-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1416-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation