Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term follow-up after vaginal sacrospinous fixation: patient satisfaction, anatomical results and quality of life

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate long-term anatomical results, symptoms of descent, and quality of life after vaginal sacrospinous fixation (SSF) through postoperative follow up study from one institution. Ninety nine women (mean 66 years) underwent vaginal SSF for vault prolapse at our institution. We contacted all patients 2–15 years after surgery for examination (POP-Q, survey). Sixteen out of 55 (29%) patients, who completed follow-up, presented with cystocele, three patients with rectocele, and four patients had a recurrent vault prolapse. As for quality of life, 42/55 (76%) patients reported lower urinary tract symptoms, but only 9/55 (16%) felt a sensation of prolapse. Ten out of 24 patients, who were still sexually active, reported symptoms of sexual dysfunction. There was no correlation between length of follow-up and anatomical or functional results. Vaginal sacrospinous fixation resulted in excellent vault suspension but 29% of the patients developed cystocele formation. Only 16% of patients reported symptoms of descent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrington JW, Edwards G (2000) Posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 11:241–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cruikshank SH, Cox DW (1990) Sacrospinous fixation at the time of transvaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:1611–1615

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scotti RJ (1992) Prophylactic sacrospinous fixation discouraged. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:1022–1023

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardiman PJ, Drutz HP (1996) Sacrospinous vault suspension and abdominal colposacropexy: success rates and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:612–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meschia M, Bruschi F, Amicarelli F, Pifarotti P, Marchini M, Crosignani PG (1999) The sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: critical analysis of outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10:155–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Richter K, Albrigh W (1981) Long term results following fixation of the vagina on the sacrospinous ligament by the vaginal route. Am J Obstet Gynecol 141:811–816

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sze EH, Karram MM (1997) Transvaginal repair of vault prolapse: a review. Obstet Gynecol 89:466–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baessler K, O, Neill S, Maher C, Battistutta D (2004) A validated female pelvic floor questionnaire for clinicians and researchers. Neurourology & Urodynamics 23:398–399

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:98–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brubaker L, Shull B (2005) EGGS for patient centered-outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:171–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan JS, Lukacz ES, Manefee SA, Powell CR, Nager CW (2005) Predictive value of prolapse symptoms: a large database study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:203–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lovatsis D, Drutz HP (2002) Safety and efficacy of sacrospinous vault suspension. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:308–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carey MP, Slack MC (1994) Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vault and marked uterovaginal prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynecol 101:536–540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen J (2004) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(4):CD004014

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Th. Aigmueller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aigmueller, T., Riss, P., Dungl, A. et al. Long-term follow-up after vaginal sacrospinous fixation: patient satisfaction, anatomical results and quality of life. Int Urogynecol J 19, 965–969 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0563-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0563-5

Keywords

Navigation