Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Obstruction after Burch colposuspension: a return to retropubic urethrolysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compare our postoperative outcomes of a vaginal vs abdominal urethrolysis after an obstructed Burch colposuspension. We performed a retrospective review of all women who had undergone a Burch urethrolysis from 1997 through 2003. Data collected included pelvic examination, cystoscopic and urodynamic findings, surgical morbidity, and pre- and postoperative urogynecologic symptomatology. Sixteen women underwent Burch urethrolysis. Preoperative symptoms were obstructive in 6, overactive in 2, and both (obstructive/overactive) in 8. All had an acute retropubic angulation of the urethral axis as well as a retropexed urethra that prohibited sagittal rotation of a rigid cystoscope. Seventy-eight percent of the women with urodynamic information met urodynamic criteria for urethral obstruction. Average follow-up was 7 months, and of those undergoing a vaginal urethrolysis, three out of seven (43%) had resolution of their obstructive or overactive symptoms postoperatively. In contrast, seven out of nine women (78%) who underwent a retropubic urethrolysis had relief of their obstructive or overactive bladder symptoms. In our cohort study, an abdominal retropubic urethrolysis was more successful in relieving urethral obstruction than a vaginal urethrolysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carr LK, Webster GD (1996) Bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urol Clin North Am 23(3):385–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scarpero HM, Dmochowski RR, Nitti VW (2003) Repeat urethrolysis after failed urethrolysis for iatrogenic obstruction. J Urol 169(3):1013–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amundsen CL, Guralnick ML, Webster GD (2000) Variations in strategy for the treatment of urethral obstruction after a pubovaginal sling procedure. J Urol 164:434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sweat SD, Itano NB, Clemens JQ, Bushman W, Gruenenfelder J, McGuire EJ, Lightner DJ (2002) Polypropylene mesh tape for stress urinary incontinence: complications of urethral erosion and outlet obstruction. J Urol 168(1):144–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maher C, Dwyer P, Carey M, Gilmour D (1999) The Burch colposuspension for recurrent urinary stress incontinence following retropubic continence surgery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:719–724

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alcalay M, Monga A, Stanton SL (1995) Burch colposuspension: a 10–20 year follow-up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102:740–745

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunn JS Jr, Bent AE, Ellerkman M, Nihira MA, Melick CF (2004) Voiding dysfunction after surgery for stress incontinence: literature review and survey results. Int Urogynecol J 15:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eriksen BC, Hagen B, Eik-Nes SH, Molne K, Mjolnerod OK, Romslo I (1990) Long-term effectiveness of the Burch colposuspension in female urinary stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 69(1):45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Raz S, Sussman AEM, Erickson DB, Bregg KJ, Nitti VW (1992) The Raz bladder neck suspension: results in 206 patients. J Urol 148(3):845–850

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Spencer JR, O'Conor VJ Jr, Schaeffer AJ (1987) A comparison of endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck with suprapubic vesicourethropexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 137(3):411–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cross CA, Cespedes DR, McGuire EJ (1998) Our experience with pubovaginal slings in patients with stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 159:1195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rackley RR, Abdelmalak JB, Tchetgen MB, Madjar S, Jones S, Noble N (2001) Tension-free vaginal tape and percutaneous vaginal tape procedures. Tech Urol 7:90–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nitti VW, Carlson KV, Blaivas JG, Dmochowski RR (2002) Early results of pubovaginal sling lysis by midline sling incision. Urology 59(1):47–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cross CA, Cespedes RD, English SF, McGuire EJ (1998) Transvaginal urethrolysis for urethral obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery. J Urol 159(4):1199–1201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Petrou SP, Brown JA, Blaivas JG (1999) Suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis. J Urol 161(4):1268–1271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zimmern PE, Hadley HR, Leach GE, Raz S (1987) Female urethral obstruction after Marshall–Marchett–Krantz operation. J Urol 138:517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Webster GD, Kreder KJ (1990) Voiding dysfunction following cystourethropexy: its evaluation and management. J Urol 144:670

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carr LK, Webster GD (1997) Voiding dysfunction following incontinence surgery: diagnosis and treatment with retropubic or vaginal urethrolysis. J Urol 157:821

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Blaivas JG, Groutz A (2000) Bladder outlet obstruction nomogram for women with lower urinary tract symptomatology. Neurourol Urodyn 19:553–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nitti VW, Tu LM, Gitlin J (1999) Diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women. J Urol 161(5):1535–4150, May

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nitti VW, Raz S (1994) Obstruction following anti-incontinence procedures: diagnosis and treatment with transvaginal urethrolysis. J Urol 152(1):93–98

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Foster HE, McGuire EJ (1993) Management of urethral obstruction with transvaginal urethrolysis. J Urol 150:1448–1451

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Goldman HB, Rackley RR, Appell RA (1999) The efficacy of urethrolysis without resuspension for iatrogenic urethral obstruction. J Urol 161:196–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Frederick J. and Theresa Dow Wallace Fund of the New York Community Trust and in part by the Kidney and Urology Foundation of America, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George D. Webster.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anger, J.T., Amundsen, C.L. & Webster, G.D. Obstruction after Burch colposuspension: a return to retropubic urethrolysis. Int Urogynecol J 17, 455–459 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-0037-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-0037-y

Keywords

Navigation