Skip to main content
Log in

Refining ionospheric delay modeling for undifferenced and uncombined GNSS data processing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To access the full capabilities of multi-frequency signals from the modernized GPS, GLONASS and newly deployed BDS, Galileo, the undifferenced and uncombined observable model in which the individual signal of each frequency is treated as independent observable has drawn increasing interest in GNSS community. The ionosphere delay is the major issue in the undifferenced and uncombined observable model. Though several ionosphere delay parameterization approaches have been promoted, we argue that the functional model with only deterministic characteristic may not follow the irregular spatial and temporal variations. On the contrary, when the ionosphere delay is estimated as random walk or even white noise with only stochastic characteristic, the ionosphere terms turn out to be non-estimable or not sensitive to their absolute value. In the authors’ previous study, we have developed the deterministic plus stochastic ionosphere model, denoted as DESIGN, in which the deterministic part expressed with second-order polynomial is estimated as piece-wise constant over 5 min and the stochastic part is estimated as random walk with constrains derived based on statistics of 4 weeks data in 2010. In this contribution, we further model the deterministic part with Fourier series and update the variogram of the stochastic part accordingly based on two-year data collected by about 150 stations. From the statistic studies, it is concluded that the main frequency components are identical for different coefficients, different stations, as well as different ionosphere activity status, but with varying amplitude. Thus, in the Fourier series expression of the deterministic part, we fix the frequency and estimate the amplitude as daily constant unknowns. Concerning the stochastic component, the variation of variogram is both, geomagnetic latitude and ionosphere activity status dependent. Thus, we use the Gaussian function and Epstein function to model the variation of geomagnetic latitude and ionosphere activity status, respectively. Based on the undifferenced and uncombined observable model with ionosphere constrained with DESIGN, both dual-frequency and single-frequency PPP are carried out to demonstrate its efficiency with three-month data collected in 2010, 2014, and 2017 with different ionosphere activity status. The experimental results suggest that compared with ionosphere-free model and our previous method, the averaged 3D improvement of our new method is 17.8 and 7.6% for dual-frequency PPP, respectively. While for single-frequency PPP, the averaged 3D improvement is 37.0 and 14%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baarda W (1981) S-transformations and criterion matrices. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaha G (1982) Free networks: minimum norm solution as obtained by the inner adjustment constraint method. J Geod 56(3):209–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilitza D (1992) International reference ionosphere (1990). Planet Space Sci 40(4):544. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(92)90174-M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanch J (2003) Using Kriging to bound satellite ranging errors due to the ionosphere. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford

  • Bock H, Jäggi A, Dach R, Schaer S, Beutler G (2009) GPS single-frequency orbit determination for low earth orbiting satellites. Adv Space Res 43(5):783–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2008.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, Gao Y (2005) Real-time precise point positioning using single frequency data. In: Proceedings of the 18th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation. The Institute of Navigation, Inc., Fairfax, USA, pp 1514–1523

  • Cressie N, Hawkins DM (1980) Robust estimation of the variogram: I. Math Geol 12(2):115–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01035243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feltens J, Schaer S (1998) IGS products for the ionosphere. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IGS analysis centers workshop, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany

  • Gu S (2013) Research on the zero-difference un-combined data processing model for multi-frequency GNSS and its applications. Ph.D., Wuhan University (in Chinese)

  • Gu S, Shi C, Lou Y, Feng Y, Ge M (2013) Generalized-positioning for mixed-frequency of mixed-GNSS and its preliminary applications. In: Proceedings of China satellite navigation conference (CSNC), pp 399–428

  • Hernández-Pajares M, Juan JM, Sanz J, Orus R, Garcia-Rigo A, Feltens J, Komjathy A, Schaer S, Krankowski A (2009) The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998. J Geod 83(3):263–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J, Héroux P (2001) Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products. GPS Solut 5(2):12–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Yuan Y, Li H, Ou J, Huo X (2012) Two-step method for the determination of the differential code biases of COMPASS satellites. J Geod 86(11):1059–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0565-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou Y, Zheng F, Gu S, Wang C, Guo H, Feng Y (2015) Multi-GNSS precise point positioning with raw single-frequency and dual-frequency measurement models. GPS Solut 20(4):849–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0495-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR, Mitra SK (1971) Generalized inverse of a matrix and its applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaer S (1999) Mapping and predicting the Earth’s ionosphere using the global positioning system. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bern, Switzerland

  • Schönemann E, Becker M, Springer T (2011) A new approach for GNSS analysis in a multi-GNSS and multi-signal environment. J Geod Sci 1(3):204–214. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-010-0023-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi C, Fan L, Li M, Liu Z, Gu S, Zhong S, Song W (2016) An enhanced algorithm to estimate BDS satellite’s differential code biases. J Geod 90(2):161–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0863-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi C, Gu S, Lou Y, Ge M (2012a) An improved approach to model ionospheric delays for single-frequency precise point positioning. Adv Space Res 49(12):1698–1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi C, Zhao Q, Li M, Tang W, Hu Z, Lou Y, Zhang H, Niu X, Liu J (2012b) Precise orbit determination of Beidou satellites with precise positioning. Sci China Earth Sci 55(7):1079–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-012-4446-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch W (1979) A review of the adjustment of free networks. Surv Rev 25(194):167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YiChung C (1997) Real time implementation of the wide area augmentation system for the global positioning system with an emphasis on ionospheric modeling. Ph.D., Stanford University, Stanford

  • Yuan Y, Ou J (2004) A generalized trigonometric series function model for determining ionospheric delay. Prog Nat Sci 14(11):1010–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferso DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005–5017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is partially sponsored by the National Key Research and Development Plan (No. 2016YFB0501802) and partially sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41504028, 41774035, 41574030, 41231174). The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. Thanks also go to IGS for data provision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengfeng Gu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Q., Wang, Y., Gu, S. et al. Refining ionospheric delay modeling for undifferenced and uncombined GNSS data processing. J Geod 93, 545–560 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1180-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1180-9

Keywords

Navigation