Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid PPP ambiguity resolution using GPS+GLONASS observations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integer ambiguity resolution (IAR) in precise point positioning (PPP) using GPS observations has been well studied. The main challenge remaining is that the first ambiguity fixing takes about 30 min. This paper presents improvements made using GPS+GLONASS observations, especially improvements in the initial fixing time and correct fixing rate compared with GPS-only solutions. As a result of the frequency division multiple access strategy of GLONASS, there are two obstacles to GLONASS PPP-IAR: first and most importantly, there is distinct code inter-frequency bias (IFB) between satellites, and second, simultaneously observed satellites have different wavelengths. To overcome the problem resulting from GLONASS code IFB, we used a network of homogeneous receivers for GLONASS wide-lane fractional cycle bias (FCB) estimation and wide-lane ambiguity resolution. The integer satellite clock of the GPS and GLONASS was then estimated with the wide-lane FCB products. The effect of the different wavelengths on FCB estimation and PPP-IAR is discussed in detail. We used a 21-day data set of 67 stations, where data from 26 stations were processed to generate satellite wide-lane FCBs and integer clocks and the other 41 stations were selected as users to perform PPP-IAR. We found that GLONASS FCB estimates are qualitatively similar to GPS FCB estimates. Generally, 98.8% of a posteriori residuals of wide-lane ambiguities are within \(\pm 0.25\) cycles for GPS, and 96.6% for GLONASS. Meanwhile, 94.5 and 94.4% of narrow-lane residuals are within 0.1 cycles for GPS and GLONASS, respectively. For a critical value of 2.0, the correct fixing rate for kinematic PPP is only 75.2% for GPS alone and as large as 98.8% for GPS+GLONASS. The fixing percentage for GPS alone is only 11.70 and 46.80% within 5 and 10 min, respectively, and improves to 73.71 and 95.83% when adding GLONASS. Adding GLONASS thus improves the fixing percentage significantly for a short time span. We also used global ionosphere maps (GIMs) to assist the wide-lane carrier-phase combination to directly fix the wide-lane ambiguity. Employing this method, the effect of the code IFB is eliminated and numerical results show that GLONASS FCB estimation can be performed across heterogeneous receivers. However, because of the relatively low accuracy of GIMs, the fixing percentage of GIM-aided GPS+GLONASS PPP ambiguity resolution is very low. We expect better GIM accuracy to enable rapid GPS+GLONASS PPP-IAR with heterogeneous receivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Shaery A, Zhang S, Rizos C (2013) An enhanced calibration method of GLONASS inter-channel bias for GNSS RTK. GPS Solut 17(2):165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banville S, Collins P, Lahaye F (2013) Concepts for undifferenced GLONASS ambiguity resolution. In: Proceedings of the 26th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation (ION GNSS+ 2013), Nashville, pp 1186–1197

  • Banville S (2016) GLONASS ionosphere-free ambiguity resolution for precise point positioning[J]. J Geod 90(5):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertiger W, Desai SD, Haines B, Harvey N, Moore AW, Owen S, Weiss JP (2010) Single receiver phase ambiguity resolution with GPS data. J Geod 84(5):327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisnath S, Gao, Y (2007) Current state of precise point positioning and future prospects and limitations. In: Proceedings of observing our changing earth. IAG symposium series, vol 133, pp 615–624

  • Blewitt G (1989) Carrier phase ambiguity resolution for the global positioning system applied to geodetic baselines up to 2000 km. J Geophys Res 94(B8):10187–10203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai C, Gao Y (2013) Modeling and assessment of combined GPS/ GLONASS precise point positioning. GPS Solut 17(2):223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang S, Wenting Y, Weiwei S, Yidong L, Rui Z (2013) GLONASS pseudorange inter-channel biases and their effects on combined GPS/GLONASS precise point positioning. GPS Solut 17(4):439–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins P, Lahaye F, Héroux P, Bisnath S (2008) Precise point positioning with AR using the decoupled clock model. In: Proc. ION GNSS 2008, September 16–19, Savannah, pp 1315–1322

  • Dong D, Bock Y (1989) Global positioning system network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California. J Geophys Res 94(B4):3949–3966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83(3):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabor MJ, Nerem RS, (1999) GPS carrier phase AR using satellite-satellite single difference. In: Proc. ION GNSS, (1999) Institute of Navigation, 14–17 September, Nashville, pp 1569–1578

  • Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier phase ambiguities in precise point positioning(PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82(7):389–399. doi:10.1007/s00190-007-0187-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Bock Y (2015) GLONASS fractional-cycle bias estimation across inhomogeneous receivers for PPP ambiguity resolution. J Geod. doi:10.1007/s00190-015-0879-0

  • Geng J, Teferle FN, Meng X, Dodson AH (2011) Towards PPP-RTK: ambiguity resolution in real-time precise point positioning. Adv Space Res 47(10):1664–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu S, Shi C, Lou Y, Liu J (2015) Ionospheric effects in uncalibrated phase delay estimation and ambiguity-fixed PPP based on raw observable model. J Geod 89(5):447–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habrich H, Beutler G, Gurtner W, Rothacher M (1999) Double difference ambiguity resolution for GLONASS/GPS carrier phase. In: Proceedings of the 12th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation (ION GPS 1999), Nashville, September 1999, pp 1609–1618

  • Han S, Rizos C (1996a) Validation and rejection criteria for integer least-squares estimation. Surv Rev 33(260):375–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han S, Rizos C (1996b) Integrated methods for instantaneous ambiguity resolution using new-generation GPS receivers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE PLANS’96, Atlanta, pp 245–261

  • Hatch R (1982) The synergism of GPS code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on satellite Doppler positioning at Physical Sciences Laboratory of New Mexico State University, Feb 8–12, vol 2, pp 1213–1231

  • Hernández-Pajares M, Juan JM, Sanz J, Orús R, Garcia-Rigo A, Feltens J, Komjathy A, Schaer SC, Krankowski A (2009) The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998. J Geod 83(3–4):263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokinen A, Feng S, Schuster W, Ochieng W, Hide C, Moore T, Hill C (2013) GLONASS aided GPS ambiguity fixed precise point positioning. J Navig 66(3):399–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J, Héroux P (2001) Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products. GPS Solut 5(2):12–28. doi:10.1007/PL00012883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlov D, Tkachenko M, Tochilin A, (2000) Statistical characterization of hardware biases in GPS+GLONASS receivers. In: Proc. ION GNSS, (2000) Institute of Navigation, September 19–22, Salt Lake City, pp 817–826

  • Landau H, Brandl M, Chen X, Drescher R, Glocker M, Nardo A, Nitschke M, Salazar D, Weinbach U, Zhang F (2013) Towards the inclusion of Galileo and BeiDou/compass satellites in trimble centerpoint RTX. In: Proceedings of the 26th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation (ION GNSS+ 2013), Nashville, pp 1215–1223

  • Lannes A, Prieur JL (2013) Calibration of the clock-phase biases of GNSS networks: the closure-ambiguity approach. J Geod 87(8):709–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. Navig J Inst Navig 56(2):135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leick A, Rapoport L, Tatarnikov D (2015) GPS satellite surveying, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Zhang X (2014) Integrating GPS and GLONASS to accelerate convergence and initialization times of precise point positioning. GPS Solut 18(3):461–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhang X, Ge M (2011) Regional reference network augmented precise point positioning for instantaneous ambiguity resolution. J Geod 85(3):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ge M, Zhang H, Wickert J (2013) A method for improving uncalibrated phase delay estimation and ambiguity-fixing in real-time precise point positioning. J Geod 87(5):405–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Ye S, Song W, Lou Y, Chen D (2016a) Integrating GPS and BDS to shorten the initialization time for ambiguity-fixed PPP. GPS Solut. doi:10.1007/s10291-016-0525-1

  • Liu Y, Song W, Lou Y, Ye S, Zhang R (2016b) Glonass phase bias estimation and its ppp ambiguity resolution using homogeneous receivers. GPS Solut, pp 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10291-016-0529-x

  • McCarthy DD, Petit G (2003) IERS Conventions (2003). IERS Technical Note No. 32, Bundesamt fuer Kartographie und Geodaesie, Frankfurt

  • Melbourne WG (1985) The case for ranging in GPS-based geodetic systems. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville, 15–19 April

  • Mervart L, Lukes Z, Rocken C, Iwabuchi T (2008) Precise Point Positioning with ambiguity resolution in real-time. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS, pp 397–405

  • Odijk D, Zhang B, Khodabandeh A, Odolinski R, Teunissen PJG (2015) On the estimability of parameters in undifferenced, uncombined GNSS network and PPP-RTK user models by means of S-system theory. J Geod. doi:10.1007/s00190-015-0854-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebischung P, Griffiths J, Ray J, Schmid R, Collilieux X, Garayt B (2012) IGS08: the IGS realization of ITRF2008. GPS Solut 16(4):483–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reussner N, Wanninger L, (2011) GLONASS Inter-frequency Biases and Their Effects on RTK and PPP Carrier phase Ambiguity Resolution. In: Proc. ION GNSS (2011) Institute of Navigation, September 19–23, Portland, pp 712–716

  • Shi C, Zhao Q, Geng J, Lou Y, Ge M, Liu J (2008) Recent development of PANDA software in GNSS data processing. In: Proceeding of the society of photographic instrumentation engineers, vol 7285, p 72851S. doi:10.1117/12.816261

  • Sleewaegen JM, Simsky A, de Wilde W, Boon F, Willems T (2012) Demystifying GLONASS inter-frequency carrier phase biases. InsideGNSS 7(3):57–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geod 70(1–2):65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen PJG, Khodabandeh A (2015) Review and principles of PPP-RTK methods. J Geod 89(3):217–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman B.W., Kerkhoff A., Rainwater D., Munton D., Banks J (2010). Absolute precise kinematic positioning with GPS and GLONASS. In: Proceedings ION-GNSS-2010, Institute of Navigation, Portland, September 21–24, pp 2565–2576

  • Wanninger L (2012) Carrier phase inter-frequency biases of GLONASS receivers. J Geod 86(2):139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanninger L, Wallstab-Freitag S (2007) Combined processing of GPS, GLONASS, and SBAS code phase and carrier phase measurements. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2007, pp 866–875

  • Wei M, Schwarz KP (1995) Fast ambiguity resolution using an integer nonlinear programming method. In: Proc. ION GPS 1995, Institute of Navigation, Palm Springs, 12–15 September, pp 1101–1110

  • Wu JT, Wu SC, Hajj GA, Bertiger WI, Lichten SM (1993) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase. Manuscripta Geodaetica 18(2):91–98

  • Wübbena G (1985) Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI-4100 code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville

  • Yamada H, Takasu T, Kubo N, Yasuda A, (2010) Evaluation and calibration of receiver inter-channel biases for RTK-GPS/GLONASS. Proc. ION GNSS (2010), Institute of Navigation, September 21–24, Portland, pp 1580–1587

  • Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophy Res 102(B3):5005–5017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the reviewers and the editor for their helpful and constructive suggestions. This work has been partially supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 41525014), National Key Research Development Program of China (2016YFB0502203), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41074008, 41404010, 41301511, 41604017, 41401444), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No. 20120141110025), Shenzhen Scientific Research and Development Funding Program (JCYJ20140418095735587).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanyan Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Ye, S., Song, W. et al. Rapid PPP ambiguity resolution using GPS+GLONASS observations. J Geod 91, 441–455 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0975-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0975-9

Keywords

Navigation