Skip to main content
Log in

Quality inspection of clinched joints of steel and aluminum

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To develop a reliable monitor method for inspecting the quality and strength of the clinched steel and pre-strained aluminum joints, the electrical resistance method was introduced. A 0.7-mm thick galvanized SAE1004 steel and 1.0-mm thick pre-strained aluminum AA6111-T4 were clinched, and the section parameters, the electric resistance, and strength of the clinched joints were measured. The strengths of the clinched joints were evaluated and correlated with the bottom thickness and electrical resistance of the joints. The results showed that the pre-strained aluminum from pre-stamping significantly increased the electrical resistance (R) and decreased the variation of electrical resistance (ΔR) and strength of the clinched joint. Both the ΔR and bottom thickness can detect the strength variation for the clinched as-received and pre-strained aluminum-steel joints, but the ΔR was more sensitive than the bottom thickness to reflect the effect of aluminum pre-straining on the joint strength. Therefore, it may be more appropriate to use the variation of electrical resistance to inspect the strength of the clinched steel and aluminum joints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller WS, Zhuang L, Bottema J, Wittebrood AJ, De Smet P, Haszler A, Vieregge A (2000) Recent development in aluminum alloys for the automotive industry. Mater Sci Eng A280:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abe Y, Mori K, Kato T (2012) Joining of high strength steel and aluminum alloy sheets by mechanical clinching with dies for control of metal flow. J Mater Process Technol 212:884–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Michalos G, Makris S, Papakostas N, Mourtzis D, Chryssolouris G (2010) Automotive assembly technologies review: challenges and outlook for a flexible and adaptive approach. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Briskham P, Blundell N, Han L, Hewitt R, Young K, Boomer D (2006) Comparison of self-pierce riveting, resistance spot welding and spot friction joining for aluminum automotive sheet. http://www.sae.org/SAE 2006 World Congress & Exhibition Technical Papers, SAE paper 2006-01-0774.

  5. Varis J (2006) Economics of clinching joint compared to riveted joint and example of applying calculations to a volume product. J Mater Process Technol 172:130–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mechanical joining, http://aluminum.matter.org.uk

  7. Varis J (2006) Ensuring the integrity in clinching process. J Mater Process Technol 174:277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oudjene M, Ben-Ayed L (2008) On the parametrical study of clinch joining of metallic sheets using the Taguchi method. Eng Struct 30:1782–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coppieters S, Cooreman S, Sol PLH, Van Houtte P, Debruyne D (2011) Reproducing the experimental pull-out and shear strength of clinched sheet metal connections using FEA. Int J Mater Form 4:429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mucha J (2011) The analysis of lock forming mechanism in the clinching joint. Mater Des 32:4943–4954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Varis JP, Lepisto J (2003) A simple testing-based procedure and simulation of the clinching process using finite element analysis for establishing clinching parameters. Thin-Walled Struct 41:691–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nong N, Keju O, Zhang Y, Zhiyuan Q, Changcheng T, Feipeng L (2003) Research on press joining technology for automotive metallic sheets. J Mater Process Technol 137:159–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiaocong H (2010) Recent development in finite element analysis of clinching joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48:607–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vishara J, Ho MK, Hoon NJ, Tae KM, Min SJ, Yong LH, Bok HB (2010) Rigid-plastic and elastic-plastic finite element analysis on the clinching joint process of thin metal sheets. Met Mater Int 16:339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan-Joo L, Kim J-Y, Sang-Kon L, Dae-Cheol K, Byung-Min K (2010) Parametric study on mechanical clinching process for joining aluminum alloy and high-strength steel sheets. J Mech Sci Technol 24:123–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Paula AA, Aguilar MTP, Pertence AEM, Cetlin PR (2007) Finite element simulations of the clinch joining of metallic sheets. J Mater Process Technol 182:352–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamel V, Roelandt JM, Gacel JN, Schmit F (2000) Finite element modeling of clinch forming with automatic remeshing. Comput Struct 77:185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oudjene M, Ben-Ayed L, Delameziere A, Batoz JL (2009) Shape optimization of clinching tools using the response surface methodology with moving least-square approximation. J Mater Process Technol 209:289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Abe Y, Kishimoto M, Kato T, Mori K (2009) Joining of hot-dip coated steel sheets by mechanical clinching. Int J Mater Form 2(suppl 1):291–294

  20. Francesco L (2013) Influence of process parameters in mechanical clinching with extensible dies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:2123–2131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiaocong H, Fulong L, Baoying X, Huiyan Y, Wang Yuqi G, Fengshou BA (2014) Numerical and experimental investigations of extensible die clinching. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6078-y

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roux E, Bouchard PO (2013) Kriging metamodel global optimization of clinching joining processes accounting for ductile damage. J Mater Process Technol 213:1038–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Coppieters S, Pascal L, Van Hecke R, Cooreman S, Sol H, Van Houtte P, Debruyne D (2013) Numerical and experimental study of the multi-axial quasi-static strength of clinched connections. Int J Mater Forming 6:437–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saberi S, Enzinger N, Vallant R, Cerjak H, Hinterdorfer J, Rauch R (2008) Influence of plastic anisotropy on the mechanical behavior of clinching joint of different coated thin steel sheets. Int J Mater Form 1(suppl 1):273–276

  25. Kato T, Abe Y, Mori K (2008) Plastic joining of dissimilar material of high tensile strength steel and aluminum alloy sheets. Weld Int 22:575–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Neugebauer R, Mauermann R, Dietrich S, Kraus C (2007) A new technology for the joining by forming of magnesium alloys. Prod Eng 1:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Neugebauer R, Kraus C, Dietrich S (2008) Advances in mechanical joining of magnesium. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57:283–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown RA (1977) Electrical resistivity of dislocations in metals. J Physics F: Metal Physics 7(7):1283–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Karolik AS, Luhvich AA (1994) Calculation of electrical resistivity produced by dislocations and grain boundaries in metals. J Phys Condens Matter 6:873–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Watts BR (1988) The contribution of the long-range strain field of dislocations in metals to their electrical resistivity. Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics 18:1183–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gibiansky LV, Torquato S (1995) Rigorous link between the conductivity and elastic moduli of fiber reinforced materials. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc (London) A353:243–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gibiansky LV, Torquato S (1993) Link between the conductivity and elastic moduli of composite materials. Phys Rev Lett 71:2927–2930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gibiansky LV, Torquato S (1996) Connection between the conductivity and bulk modulus of isotropic composite materials. Proc: Math, Phys Eng Sci 452(1945):253–283

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Adeosun SO, Sekunowo OI, Balogun SA, Osoba LO (2011) Effect of deformation on the mechanical and electrical properties of aluminum-magnesium alloy. J Miner Mat Charact Eng 10:553–560

    Google Scholar 

  35. Park D-Y, Niewczas M (2008) Plastic deformation of Al and AA5754 between 4.2 K and 295 K. Mater Sci Eng A491:88–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dominguez D, Sevostianov I (2011) Cross-property connection between work-hardening coefficient and electrical resistivity of stainless steel during plastic deformation. Int J Fract 167:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. de Silva Paulo Maria O, de Abreu Hamilton Ferreira G, de Albuquerque Victor Hugo C, de Lima NP, Tavares João Manuel RS (2011) Cold deformation effect on the microstructures and mechanical properties of AISI 301LN and 316 L stainless steels. Mater Des 32:605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong-Xia Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, T., Liu, ZX. & Wang, PC. Quality inspection of clinched joints of steel and aluminum. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76, 1393–1402 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6362-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6362-x

Keywords

Navigation