Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design configuration for a mixed-model assembly system in case of low product demand

  • Original article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to accompany the increasing variety of costumers’ demands, manufacturers tend to produce different models of the same product on an assembly line by introducing group assembly (GA) design concepts that improve the flexibility of assembly systems. Generally, when the demand for a set of similar products is relatively low and the set-up time is significant, the beneficial effects of the task repeatability of the straight line configuration are difficult to achieve. As a consequence, the fixed-point assembly philosophy is often preferred. This paper addresses the application of a mixed-model assembly balancing problem to an assembly-to-order environment in the case of low production rates and large number of tasks. The aim of this work is to propose an alternative design procedure for the balancing of semi-automated and mixed-model assembly systems under low product demand effects by the application of multi-turn circular transfers, such as a multi-stations rotating table. This layout configuration permits a job enlargement for human operators and, at the same time, provides an increment in task repeatability through the work-pieces assembling by increasing the number of the turns of the transfer. Finally, the developed heuristic procedure is tested on a simple rotating table assembly cell, a partial representation of a complete assembly system of domestic air compressors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang HP, Li JK (1991) Computer-aided process planning. Elsevier, North Holland, pp 291–296

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bukchin J et al (2002) Mixed model assembly line design in a make-to-order environment. Comput Ind Eng 41:405–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta P, Somers T (1992) The measurement of manufacturing flexibility. Eur J Oper Res 60(3):160–182

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lederer PJ, Singhal VR (1988) Effect of cost structure and demand risk in the justification of new technologies. J Manuf Oper Manage 1(4):339–371

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jordan W, Graves C (1995) Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Manage Sci 41(4):577–594

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Beker C, Scholl A (2005) A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing. Eur J Oper Res 168:694–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aase GR et al (2004) U-shaped assembly line layouts and their impact on labor productivity: an experimental study. Eur J Oper Res 156:698–711

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Engstrom T et al (1996) Alternatives to line assembly: some Swedish examples. Ind Ergon 17:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heike G et al (2001) Mixed model assembly alternatives for low-volume manufacturing: the case of the aerospace industry. Int J Prod Econ 72:103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McMullen PR (1998) JIT sequencing for mixed-model assembly lines with setups using Tabu Search. Prod Plan Control 9(5):504–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen Y, Dar-el E (1998) Optimizing the number of stations in assembly lines under learning for limited production. Prod Plan Control 9(3):230–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdullah TA, Popplewell K, Page CJ (2003) A review of the support tools for the process of assembly method selection and assembly planning. Int J Prod Res 41(11):2391–2410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bard JF (1989) Assembly line balancing with parallel workstations and dead time. Int J Prod Res 27:1005–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buzacott JA (1990) Abandoning the moving assembly line: models of human operators and job sequencing. Int J Prod Res 28(5):821–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bartholdi JJ (1993) Balancing two-sided assembly lines: a case study. Int J Prod Res 31:2447–2461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Inman RR, Leon M (1994) Scheduling duplicate serial stations in transfer lines. Int J Prod Res 32(11):2631–2644

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kadefors R et al (1996) Ergonomics in parallelized car assembly: a case study, with reference also to productivity aspects. Appl Ergon 27(2):101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Zante-de Fokkert JI, De Kok TG (1997) The mixed and multi model line balancing problem: a comparison. Eur J Oper Res 100:399–412

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. McMullen PR (1997) A heuristic for solving mixed-model line balancing problem with stochastic task durations and parallel stations. Int J Prod Econ 51(1):77–190

    Google Scholar 

  20. Askin RG, Zhou M (1997) A parallel station heuristic for the mixed-model production line balancing problem. Int J Prod Res 35(11):3095–3105

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Gokçen H, Erel E (1997) A goal programming approach to mixed model assembly line balancing problem. Int J Prod Economics 48:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Suer GA (1998) Designing parallel assembly lines. Comput Ind Eng 35(3–4):467–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Urban TL (1998) Note: optimal balancing of U-shaped assembly line. Manage Sci 44:738–774

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarker BR, Pan H (1998) Designing a mixed-model assembly line to minimize the cost of idle and utility times. Comput Ind Eng 34(3):609–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Scholl A, Klein R (1999) ULINO: optimally balancing U-shaped JIT assembly lines. Int J Prod Res 37(4):721–736

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim YK, Kim K, Lee TO (1999) Two-sided assembly line balancing models. Technical report. Chonnam National University, Kwangju

    Google Scholar 

  27. Erel E, Gokcen H (1999) Shortest route formulation of mixed model assembly line balancing problem. Eur J Oper Res 116:194–204

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim YK, Kim Y, Kim JY (2000)Two-sided assembly line balancing: a genetic algorithm approach. Prod Plan Control 11:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Miltenburg J (2001) U-shaped production lines: A review of theory and practice. Int J Prod Econ 70:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee TO et al (2001) Two-sided assembly line balancing to maximize work relatedness and slackness. Comput Ind Eng 40:273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rekiek B et al (2001) A multiple objective grouping, genetic algorithm for assembly line design. J Intell Manuf 12:467–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sarker BR, Pan H (2001) Design a mixed-model, open-station assembly line using mixed-integer programming. J Oper Res Soc 52:545–558

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Sarker BR, Pan H (2001) Design configuration for a closed-station, mixed-model assembly line: a filing cabinet manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 39(10):2251–2270

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Vilarinho PM, Simaria AS (2002) A two stage heuristic method for balancing mixed model assembly lines with parallel workstations. Int J Prod Res 40(6):1405–1420

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Kurashige K et al (2002) Time-based goal chasing method for mixed-model assembly line problem with multiple work stations. Prod Plan Control 13(8):735–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jin M, Wu SD (2002) A new heuristic method for mixed model assembly line balancing problem. Comput Ind Eng 44:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Munoz LF, Villalobos JR (2002) Work allocation strategies for serial assembly lines under high labor turnover. Int J Prod Res 40(8):1835–1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Karabat S, Sayin S (2003) Assembly line balancing in a mixed-model sequencing environment with synchronous transfers. Eur J Oper Res 149:417–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Hop N (2004) A heuristic solution for fuzzy mixed-model line balancing problem. Eur J Oper Res 168(3):798–810

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Gokçen H, Agpak K (2004) A goal programming approach to simple U-line balancing problem. Eur J Oper Res 171(2):577–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Urban TL, Chiang WC (2004) An optimal piecewise-linear optimization of the U-line balancing problem with stochastic task time. Eur J Oper Res 168(3):771–782

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim YK et al (2004) An endosymbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the integration of balancing and sequencing in mixed model U-lines. Eur J Oper Res 168(3):838–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Simaria AS, Vilarinho PM (2004) A genetic algorithm based approach to the mixed model assembly line balancing problem of type II. Comput Ind Eng 47:391–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bukchin Y, Rabinowitch I (in press) A branch-and-bound based solution approach for the mixed model assembly line balancing problem for minimizing stations and tasks duplication costs. Eur J Oper Res

  45. Scholl A (1995) Balancing and sequencing of assembly lines. Physica, Munich

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and Engineering, University of Padova Stradella San Nicola, 3 36100, Vicenza, Italy

    D. Battini, M. Faccio, A. Persona & F. Sgarbossa

  2. Department of Industrial and Mechanical Plants, University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento, 2 40136, Bologna, Italy

    E. Ferrari

Authors
  1. D. Battini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Faccio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Ferrari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Persona
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Sgarbossa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Battini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Battini, D., Faccio, M., Ferrari, E. et al. Design configuration for a mixed-model assembly system in case of low product demand. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34, 188–200 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0576-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0576-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation